HP: Matthew once. Myself? Several times before I followed. How about you? Did you follow the first time the Spirit spoke to your heart of your need?
Once. Yes
HP: Now we stand by faith in possession of the earnest or sure hope of eternal life, IF we hold fast our profession without wavering until the end. Heb 3:6 “But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, IF WE HOLD FAST the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.”
Remember who Hebrews is written to.
HP: Agreed, but our decision must be proved to be our final decision as our faith is tested as we walk daily. We must continue steadfast until the end to make it in. One act of faith without a continuance of that faith as shown forth by works consistent with that faith, is mere dead faith and dead faith will save no one.
Was Peter saved even though he denied Jesus three times?
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
A perfect participle puts the emphasis on the existing result. In the nature of the case the act described by a perfect participle will be antecedent to the time of the leading verb, but the state that has resulted from the past action will be contemporaneous with the leading verb. The inheritance was reserved in past tense and continues in the present tense.
We move from a lively hope “to an inheritance..” which again is 'reserved' for us. Nothing necessitates that we claim that what is reserved for us.
Not really. One who does not have salvation has no hope. Once he has received Christ he has hope and salvation at the same time.
HP: It begins with one act of faith but is not completed in totality until we stand before the Judge of All Ages and give an account for every word, deed and thought.
I do not agree with your understanding of salvation. If you believe that then how would you interpret 1 Cor 3:15, "If any man's work is burned up, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire."
HP: Certainly 1Cor. 3:15 speaks of rewards, but that does not take away anything from the truth that one may start right yet forsake the faith making shipwreck of ones faith and be lost in the end.
I agree but would contend that he never had salvation because one who claims to know God and then turns around and says he never knew God is a liar. The problem you present is the problem we have in America of poorly presenting what Christ commands before people make their decision when all they got was a fraudulent message and swindled into something they knew nothing about. Often those people leave because they realize they were defrauded into believing a lie.
There will be some that are found in Christ yet whose works suffer loss. No one denies that. What that verse does not do is usher into the kingdom those that have started well but have not kept the faith.
We cannot judge those people because God's timetable is not ours. If you study history you realize that there were those in the early church who left the faith and then repented and followed Christ.
HP: In this world we entertain a hope of eternal life, holding salvation by faith not absolute knowledge.
I would disagree simply because of the basic definition of faith and the assurance we have of salvation. Salvation is secured by Christ and reserved in heaven for those who are His.
Heb. 11:1, "Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen."
1 John 5:11-13, "And the testimony is this, that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life. These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life."
The word for know is the same way in which a husband would know his wife. It is much more than just having a head knowledge as we often think about doctrine, etc.
HP: There is a gulf fixed between having an assurance, which by the way Paul refers to it as a ‘hope’ of salvation on more than one occasion, and having absolute knowledge. One is simply deceived if they believe they have absolute knowledge of their final standing before God until they stand in judgment before Him.
I would question your view of the Holy Spirit then.
Faith and absolute knowledge are at antipodes and cannot coexist.
To have absolute knowledge would be to suggest that one can understand beyond comprehension. Man's knowledge is finite and limited to what God wants him to know.
HP: A ‘creedal faith?’ Show us where that is used or defined in Scripture. You either have faith or your faith is dead is the teaching of the Word of God.
James talks about a genuine saving faith and a faith from dead works which is a creedal faith that the Jews held onto.
HP: Where is the proof that although they once had saving faith that they could not have, as Scripture clearly states is possible, turned from that faith and made shipwreck of their faith?
I would contend that they may have had a faith that was dead and appeared as thought they knew God but did not and were found shipwrecked. If one confessed Christ as Lord he had to have realized that he could have been executed. Just as there are today in countries where the Christians are under persecution there were also imposters then. I would ask the question how could one who claims to know God turn around and claim to not know God and that He never existed.
In 2004 I had a dialog with one of those like you suggest. He is on a website promoting atheism and various other anti-Christian materials. When I asked him about his life's story I quickly found out that he had been an elder in a large evangelical church. When I got right down to showing him where he was wrong he wanted no further dialog. He had been on a journey of philosophical arguments but never finding the truth. When I steered him onto the truth and where he had gone wrong he got quite hard against the truth. He did not want to know the truth and how he had gone wrong. Instead he was more interested in misleading people. If he had followed through on the dialog I had with him it meant that he would have had to be humble and admit he was wrong after he already had a following.