Yes and the Christophanies were "appearances" in a body not a product of human birth.It is definitive that all appearances of God in the OT are none other than the preincarnate Son of God (John 1:8).
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes and the Christophanies were "appearances" in a body not a product of human birth.It is definitive that all appearances of God in the OT are none other than the preincarnate Son of God (John 1:8).
Yes. His is explicitly referred to as the Son who revels God being the Son before His incarnation. John 1:18.Yes and the Christophanies were "appearances" in a body not a product of human birth.
Again IMO prophetic.Yes. His is explicitly referred to as the Son who revels God being the Son before His incarnation. John 1:18.
Unto us a son is given, a child is born!Was Jesus a son before being human?
The Son was/is eternally begotten of/from the Father, so both are equally God!Father -Son implies one exits before another and that God who became flesh is subordinate to God the Father.
He was God. He was flesh.
We too are spiritual beings(not God though) as while we are fleshly beings.
That is why I disagree with Dr Grudem on Eternal subordination, as do see them as equals, and see the eternal; relationship as the Father to Son, but was subordinate only during the Incarnation, during his time here on earth!Technically speaking the Father-Son relationship did not exist before the incarnation UNLESS the term begotten of the Father implies that relationship in eternity.
From my point of view "Begotten" does not imply subordination but is a descriptive word of a coequal relationship.
That is the Son (Logos) emanates from the "bosom" (innermost being) of the Father. An eternal relationship.
bosom kolpos Liddell Scott:23019 bosom, womb.
The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father (and the Son).
Both equally and fully God, as the Father eternal begotten the Son!nope, please explain their relationship before Jesus was human?
He was the Son prior to being sent. All appearances in the OT are explicitly said to be the Son and were temporal acts, as was the creation by the Son (Hebrews 1:2).Again IMO prophetic.
Of course from all eternity God's PLAN was the sonship of Jesus Christ (O LOGOS) but in actuality it happened in the time continuum at His conception in Mary's womb.
Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,
Our differences are semantics.
I have made my case - let the readers review my rebuttals and decide for themselves.He was the Son prior to being sent. All appearances in the OT are explicitly said to be the Son and were temporal acts, as was the creation by the Son (Hebrews 1:2).
Agreed, there is one throne in Rev,yet both are described on the throneThat is why I disagree with Dr Grudem on Eternal subordination, as do see them as equals, and see the eternal; relationship as the Father to Son, but was subordinate only during the Incarnation, during his time here on earth!
A Father suggest He existed before a sonBoth equally and fully God, as the Father eternal begotten the Son!
He was to be a son given when he was flesh . not a Son in Heaven before He was fleshUnto us a son is given, a child is born!
He was God before being being flesh.He was the Son prior to being sent. All appearances in the OT are explicitly said to be the Son and were temporal acts, as was the creation by the Son (Hebrews 1:2).
Was He human before He was a Son?Was He a son to the Father before being human?
no,Was He human before He was a Son?
I believe we both have.I have made my case - let the readers review my rebuttals and decide for themselves.
He was also "with God" being someone other than God (John 1:2). Being "made" flesh was change as to how He was with God, but not a change that He "was God."He was God before being being flesh.
Except that John states they forever existed together!A Father suggest He existed before a son
Jesus was fully God before the incarnation event... he was God, and yet was not the Father Himself...He was also "with God" being someone other than God (John 1:2). Being "made" flesh was change as to how He was with God, but not a change that He "was God."