KenH continues to say that God's Word is wrong. He defines God's sovereignty unBiblically.
Van continues to say that God's Word is wrong. He defines God's sovereignty unBiblically.
Yet, KenH goes on to deny that God is always sovereign if as He says things happen by chance.
You say that things happen by chance, Van, not me. God's Word teaches that God is always, totally, absolutely sovereign. You deny this Biblical teaching.
God does "allow" something to happen. That is what being sovereign means.
God is always, totally, absolutely sovereign. That is what being sovereign means.
KenH denies that God is all powerful. He attributes no events to chance.
Van denies that God is all powerful. Van attributes events to chance.
KenH denies that God is the Potter and that all of His Creation, including KenH, is the clay.
Van denies that God is the Potter and that all of His creation, including Van, is the clay.
God's Word teaches that God is always, totally, absolutely sovereign.
On this we agree, yet you go on to deny this Biblical teaching.
The man-made dogma of KenH, very much Calvinistic, promotes the fallen, vile mankind, that says that humans have no opportunity to trust in Christ..
The man-made dogma of Van, very much Deistic, promotes the false teaching that man is the captain of his own fate. Van denies that God chose His elect before the world began. Van promotes the false teaching that man can elect himself to salvation, that God has no say in the matter. It is very much like the Pelagianism that I grew up with in the Church of Christ. Van is teaching that by fulfilling some condition, he can obligate God to save him. Van, in essence, teaches that man is sovereign and God is subject to His creation.
Does believing upon Christ automatically mean the person is "captain of their fate?" Nope.
Yet, that is what you teach.
See
Matthew 7 and those who proclaimed, "Lord, Lord." Or the second and third soils of
Matthew 13.
People such as those were never granted the gifts of saving faith and repentance from dead works.