• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Everything We Have Been Taught About Our Origins Is A Lie

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is currently accepted by science and geology that coal is a by-product of decaying vegetation. The vegetation becomes buried over time and is covered with sediment. That sediment eventually fossilises and becomes rock. This natural process of coal formation takes up to 400 million years to accomplish.

Anything that is found in lumps of coal or in coal seams during mining, had to have been placed or dropped into the vegetation before it was buried in sediment.

....In 1944, as a ten year old boy, Newton Anderson, dropped a lump of coal in his basement and it broke in half as it hit the floor. What he discovered inside defies explanation based upon current scientific orthodoxy.

Inside the coal was a hand crafted brass alloy bell with an iron clapper and sculptured handle.

When an analysis was carried out it was discovered that the bell was made from anunusual mix of metals, different from any known modern alloy production (including copper, zinc, tin, arsenic, iodine, and selenium).

The seam from whence this lump of coal was mined is estimated to be 300,000,000 years old!

- See more at: http://www.maltanow.com.mt/?p=2927#sthash.RyArPy2K.dpuf
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But Rev, the "bell" just as the coal had no doubt come together by chance after a very long series of circumstances (we would probably be told).


HankD
 

SolaSaint

Well-Known Member
I took a class on oil and coal formation and it was a great study. They could get good results with the right conditions of heat and pressure in a very short time to produce coal. They also did a study that shows most of the great oil deposits world wide were proof of a world wide flood and quick burial that is also a requirement for this formation. Good stuff.

Here's a good link" http://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=51
 

HAMel

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You should check out the Forbidden Archeology websites. A lot of strange stuff indeed.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Aside from the host of assumptions and manipulation in many dating methods, one doesn't need millions of years to make coal, rock, or diamonds. All one needs are the right conditions.
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
Aside from the host of assumptions and manipulation in many dating methods, one doesn't need millions of years to make coal, rock, or diamonds. All one needs are the right conditions.

Even mathematics, the Queen of the sciences has foundations of assumptions. Does theology?
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Even mathematics, the Queen of the sciences has foundations of assumptions. Does theology?
o
Proper theology has facts, not assumptions, as we take all theology frm the Bible, what gets assumed though is that we can rightly divide those facts!
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
Yes, even theology has assumptions. The bible never tries to prove the existence of God. It merely assumes it.

"In the beginning God . . . " :)
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
Name one. I'll bet it's not like the un substantiated assumptions in dating methods. Fossils date the rocks.

Definition of a point.....a mathematical assumption. I think you read and accept too many opposing views on the science of various dating techniques. Like it or not...the math (and science) is solid.

http://debunkingdenialism.com/2011/...org/article/mark-226-and-problem-abiatharons/

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/101_evidences_for_a_young_age_of_the_Earth_and_the_universe
 
Last edited by a moderator:

quantumfaith

Active Member
And even the Queen of Science, mathematics, has assumptions, and sometimes those assumptions turn out to be wrong. :)

http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2013/08/long-held-foundational-math-assumption-wrong

Thank you tcassidy.....that is the very nature and posture of science....and mathematics. When new math (or science) is discovered it goes through rigorous professional review. Case in point, Dr. Andrew Wiles proof of Fermats Last Theorem.....His first proposal (after 10 years of work) was shown to contain some minor errors, and then they were corrected. Science ALWAYS leaves itself open to further investigation and refinement, without that intellectual posture it would be quite difficult to make advancements.
 
Top