This stuff goes way back. No less than the London Baptist Assembly of 1689 issued this ruling:
Proceedings of the London Baptist Assembly of 1689
"Questions Proposed from the Several Churches, Debated, and Resolved
. . . . .
Q. Whether it be not necessary for the elders, ministering-brethren, and messengers of the churches to take into their serious consideration those excesses that are found among their members, men and women, with respect to their apparel ?
A. In the affirmative. That it is a shame for men to wear long hair, or long periwigs, and especially ministers..."
Proceedings of the London Baptist Assembly of 1689
"Questions Proposed from the Several Churches, Debated, and Resolved
. . . . .
Q. Whether it be not necessary for the elders, ministering-brethren, and messengers of the churches to take into their serious consideration those excesses that are found among their members, men and women, with respect to their apparel ?
A. In the affirmative. That it is a shame for men to wear long hair, or long periwigs, and especially ministers..."