As for the consistency and logic of the theology - it's true that that has never been my primary interest. I am a Calvinist because I love the Puritans and their writings, not because the theological debate has won me over.
Yes, I can understand that. It is exactly what I expressed about MacArthur. I think it is the appeal of Calvinism. It is to be in the congregation of the elite. There is a huge price to pay for that I believe. I have heard him pretty much apologize for being a dispensationalist, such as he is.
But I have noticed that when it comes to theological debate, the staunch Calvinists completely mop up the floor with the non-Calvinists, both on this forum and in the books you read. But for me, I just noticed that the serious writings about sin and salvation were almost all being done by Calvinists.
If you identify non Calvinists as Russellites, Campbellites, Mormons, Pentecostals, Charismatics, Southern Baptists and even most fundamental Baptists I can see your point. As far as your point about sin and salvation, have you not followed what these Calvinists have argued on this very thread. The main posters and others on here cannot give a scriptural definition of sin or salvation. They do not know what faith is and they think to be dead spiritually is to be unable to think or reason and or process information to a desired end.