Just trying to stay consistent with the view that some hold.
It never occurred to these same that this view of Calvin resulted in his belief that the church was inclusive of the social community and not viewed as the Scripture teaches as being a strict community of believers, which as you know membership particularly depends on voluntary submission to baptism, hence my belief that this is not a representation of the church.
It is the failure of correct teaching, or over emphasis on the part of all including Calvinists that result in the error in the actions of the saints, past and present.
I am sure you know church history sufficiently to know that Christian evangelization is not rejected in Asian countries because God does not have a people to call from those places, but rather because of the baggage our missionary brethren carried with them to those lands to impose western culture rather than the doctrines of God.
I am not sufficient to declare these things, but from time to time I wonder if anyone else is declaring them.
Oh well. We cannot save the world, so let's incorporate their pagan traditions and influence their culture and at the same time present Christ in such a way that acceptance does not mean only reconciliation with God, but also westernization.
How did this happen? Because the established church began to view itself as a protectorate of the society and thus engulfed all individuals in its geographic control and influence.
You know this so I will shut up now.
BTW, after midnight, Mumbo Jumbo becomes my middle name, can't help it, just seem to lose my composure, sorry. I guess you have noticed I enjoy a good laugh

at least I hope you noticed this.
Have you read the comment Spurgeon made concerning the sense of humor God possesses? In relation to his pug bull-dogs? Granted, I am no C.H. Spurgeon, but I agree with him.
God Bless
Bro. Dallas