Yea well the Democrats need a new voting base.And they are willing to bring people in illegally to get it. They are traitors.
Traitors? Really?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yea well the Democrats need a new voting base.And they are willing to bring people in illegally to get it. They are traitors.
Traitors? Really?
Seems a bit of an over statement to me, but ok.
...In spite of my anti-amnesty stance, I can accept a pathway to citizenship as a compromise if it also entails truly securing the border and a more restrictive legal immigration policy. However, the current Senate proposal falls short.
That's right, and to gain a base large enough to prevail, it must be composed of those who come to simply kill, steal or destroy.Liberals do not care anything about illegal immigrants. They are just trying to obtain a larger voter base. They are nothing but a political tool.
Down here in So Fla they don't call them 'illegal' anymore. They are "undocumented". Aside from a fresh batch of people who want to come here and don't want to assimilate, but transfer their own language and culture to our geographical area, they take the jobs that used to be available for those who were born and raised in this country, whatever their ethnicity.
Regan tried that back in 1986, some 3 million were granted legal status......
I know, but the border wasn't really secured. I would prefer to not do amnesty, but if it's part of a package that really secures the border, I could live with it.
They could, but it is the long waiting period....... If they can pay a coyote to get here they can pay to go through the regular LEGAL process as well.
They could, but it is the long waiting period....
If something is worth having, it is worth waiting for, just like heaven!
I agree
but we are off the OP - Crabby was telling us about famous people who at one point were illegal.
Since they became famous - should we look the other way?
I refer you to post #7 of this thread that Crabby has not answered; making me assume that, for him anyway, any "greats" lost by abortion are ok, just not those potential losses by enforcing immigration laws!?:sleep:
After all, the cure for cancer just may have gone down a PP waste disposal???