Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Actually, she could be - but would not have been able to take the oath of office until she turned 35She was not a candidate for President. She did not meet the Constitutional requirement of being 35 years of age.
Actually, she could be - but would not have been able to take the oath of office until she turned 35
Now some other things -
She ran on the Equal Rights Party - not a major party. The Hillary campaign has made it clear that Hillary is the first woman candidate of a major party - besides - much ado about nothing.
Woodhull was a Spiritualist
Evidently saw no problem with divorce (she was married 3 times)
Do you think God is a hypocrite in the Old Testament for commanding Capital punishment for murder after the Genesis flood, and then in the Mosaic law for murder and adultery but also for condemning the Canaanites for offering their babies to Moloch? Does that make God a hypocrite too?Seems Victoria was against the hypocrisy of saying she was pro-life while advocating for capital punishment at the same time.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Do you think God is a hypocrite in the Old Testament for commanding Capital punishment for murder after the Genesis flood, and then in the Mosaic law for murder and adultery but also for condemning the Canaanites for offering their babies to Moloch? Does that make God a hypocrite too?
Do you think God is a hypocrite in the Old Testament for commanding Capital punishment for murder after the Genesis flood, and then in the Mosaic law for murder and adultery but also for condemning the Canaanites for offering their babies to Moloch? Does that make God a hypocrite too?
So the death penalty is allowed.HE ALLOWS the government to do so just as He ALLOWS the government to sanction divorce.
So now the burden of proof is showing which "Christians" advocate for the taking of anyone's life.He has NOT advocated that Christians advocate for the taking of anybody's life after the Cross. It would be a foolish thing to do and God is no fool.
Now that y'all have allowed a couple of extreme far left wingers to derail this thread like they like to do when the op does not suit their liking it is time to close it down.