Flat-Earth Christians

[Ascetic X]

1 John 2:9,10,11 — He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now. He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him. But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.

 

[Oseas3]

1 John 2:9,10,11 — He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now. He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him. But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.

Yes, perfect. John 3:35-36

35 The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into His hand.-> John 17:10
36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of GOD abideth on him. ->Revelation 11:18, take a look.

 

[Van]

But it could be wrong in science?)

I understand your change of subject question to be "but the bible could be scientifically wrong?"

And your unstated implication is, do you Van believe the original autographs could be wrong?

And of course my answer is NO, the original autographs were the very words of God.

Folks, these Calvinists simply post diversionary questions to disrupt discussion of scripture, because their doctrines do not stand up to study.

the people who have copied the original autographs may have introduced errors, and more likely our understanding may be in error

 

[Marooncat79]

It the Bible is wrong at any point, even science, it is untrustworthy on any subject

 

[Van]

It the Bible is wrong at any point, even science, it is untrustworthy on any subject

Note the implication someone questioned whether God made an error. The false insinuations are for the purpose of diversion.

Returning to topic:

When we look back to our history, we find professing Christians who did not have our current understanding of our physical universe. Trolls try to use those inferences to mistaken views as a shibboleth to attack the trustworthiness and reliability of scripture.

They say, see the bible teaches a flat earth, rather than some thought the bible taught a flat earth.

But the humble do not close their minds to the possibility we may not understand minutiae. After all, the people who have copied the original autographs may have introduced errors, and more likely our understanding may be in error. But we can take this to the bank, our bible is trustworthy and reliable to provide us sufficient guidance to Christ.​

​