1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Foreknowledge or Foresight?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by J.D., Mar 20, 2006.

  1. Paul33

    Paul33 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sometimes people are sleeping and away from their computers!

    Surrender is not resisting God (or not persisting in rebellion against God) in the presence of his grace.

    It is not an active choice to choose God. It is a passive choice to not resist God.

    In surrender, God then continues his work of drawing you to himself by regenerating you through his Spirit, giving you the gift of faith to believe and repentance to turn from sin, so that you call out to the Lord and be saved.

    We can't choose God because we are dead in our sins and don't want to choose God. But in the encounter with his grace, we are able to stop resisting him. In other words, we can do nothing!

    This is looking at prevenient grace from the other side. Prevenient grace doesn't enable us to believe and repent and thus be regenerated. It enables us to become passive before God so that he can draw us to himself.

    BTW, these are my ideas only. I've never read them in a book or heard them from a professor. It is my attempt to bridge the gap between Calvinists and Arminians. I think I'm on the right track.

    What think ye?
     
  2. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    A few posts ago, I had my tongue in my cheek, at least part way, when I said that if I was elected because God foresaw my faith, then I elected myself, and deserved most, if not all the glory.

    But if foreseen faith is the correct view of election, how can that not be? God had no choice. He was forced to elect me. I had something the un-elect didn't have--faith. Why did I have it? Why, I was smarter and more enlightened. Why should I thank God? Shouldn't I thank myself?

    Obviously, I don't believe all that, so holster your weapons, please. Just trying to point out some inconsistencies in the foreseen faith view.

    Tom B.
     
  3. GLC

    GLC New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well stated Tom. This discussion is always brought into perspective by asking that question. What in one person causes them to accept Christ while another person rejects? Is there something slightly better in them? Are they smarter or more sensitive? Are they slightly less sinful and rebellious? No! Our salvation relies totally on God's grace & mercy. He chose us, we did not choose him.
     
  4. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    O.K. now this string has degraded, or elevated if you prefer, into a general debate over calvinism - which is to be expected.

    But have we answere the question - are we elected according to foreknowledge or foresight? Which is it? I might try a poll. Does anyone know how to put a poll in the middle of a string?
     
  5. Frenchy

    Frenchy New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tom quote
    EXACTLY man gets the glory and not God, very good.
     
  6. Frenchy

    Frenchy New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well J.D. the correct translation of Foreknowledge is ORDAINED
     
  7. Plain Old Bill

    Plain Old Bill New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    It might [rove interesting for some of you to go to: http://www.mrdsnotes.com
    Go to his book on theological notes pages 985-994 and see what that says.I did'nt want to cut and paste.By the way many other interesting things to see and read.
    Mr D is a seminary proffessor in a Baptist seminary in Oregon.
     
  8. philocharis

    philocharis New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    I obviously disagree, but the problem I have with your response is that you simply dodged the whole issue. </font>[/QUOTE]
     
  9. Humblesmith

    Humblesmith Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Peter's epistle says we are "elect according to foreknowledge." Note that it is "according to" not "based on." It is in accordance with: e.g., agrees with, is parallel to, does not conflict with, etc. This is different than saying God makes decisions "based on" foreknowledge, which He does not do.
     
  10. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    Well it took me a while but I finally found what Mr. "D" actually believes about the issue at hand.

    "2. Conditional election: God chose and elected based on His foreknowledge of what a person would do if placed in a certain set of circumstances leading up to the point of a decision about Christ."

    Found it in his notes on Arminius.

    So then I take it, PlainOld Bill, that your vote is that election is according to foresight?
     
  11. rjprince

    rjprince Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Frenchy,

    No. Foreknowledge is not foreordained -- foreknow is proginwskw, foreordain is prohoridzw -- two very different words, but they are connected in idea as far as election is concerned...

    Ray
     
  12. Plain Old Bill

    Plain Old Bill New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not quite. God is not restricted by time.Time is a dimension for man not God.Words like foreknowledge and forsight are useful to man,God just knows since He is omniscient.
     
  13. Plain Old Bill

    Plain Old Bill New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dr. Dericksons' notes on theology are worth taking the time to read.He takes a little different view and coins the term "Calminian",which is where I think most people actually fall theologically.That view seems to me to be a bit more biblical.We take the best of both which align closest to the Bible and throw out the rest.

    We learn from others but must not follow men blindly. Calvin was 29 when he wrote the institutes, less than half my age.I wonder how much his views had shanged that we don't know about between the years of 29 and his last breath.We will never know because he did'nt record all of his thoughts.
     
  14. Humblesmith

    Humblesmith Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree. This is a VERY important point. This, to me, is one of the keys to the whole thing. There is no "before and after" with a being who is not in time, who is in one everpresent eternity. So, God's actions are unified, and not done in sequence. Technically, He does not "fore-" anything. However, in order to communicate with us, who are stuck in time, he uses anthropomorphisms to make things a tad clearer.
     
  15. Timtoolman

    Timtoolman New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree. This is a VERY important point. This, to me, is one of the keys to the whole thing. There is no "before and after" with a being who is not in time, who is in one everpresent eternity. So, God's actions are unified, and not done in sequence. Technically, He does not "fore-" anything. However, in order to communicate with us, who are stuck in time, he uses anthropomorphisms to make things a tad clearer. </font>[/QUOTE]I am with you there Humblesmith. I tried to convey the same thing quite a while back. It is perplexing. I think those terms are used to help us understand.
     
  16. Plain Old Bill

    Plain Old Bill New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    They can be useful terms until people get to hung up on them.I think we often tend to overwork theological words(foreknowledge,predestination,peccable,impeccability,ect.).
     
Loading...