1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Forgotten principles in divorcing someone...

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Daniel David, Jan 23, 2003.

  1. Daniel David

    Daniel David New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no legalism involved. I posted 9 points that must be considered. If a divorce must occur, it cannot violate any of the 9 principles I mentioned. Remember that Scripture does not contradict itself.

    Regarding the 2 reasons why divorce might take place, I challenge the given reasons.

    1. According to Jesus in Matthew 19, divorce was a concession for those under the Law of Moses. Further, to divorce meant you had a hard heart. There is never an excuse for a believer to have a hard heart.

    2. I assume that 1 Cor. 7:15 is what is meant here. It says that if the UNBELIEVING spouse leaves, let him go. Paul was careful to point out who must do the divorcing.

    Separation yes. Divorce no. Divorce violates so many principles.
     
  2. SAVED4LIFE

    SAVED4LIFE New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, what would you all suggest for a Christian woman married to a non-beleiver that goes out and gets drunk/does drugs, stays gone all night, sometimes til the next day and swears he'll never do it again, but does over and over and over again? This person has 2 kids who are perfectly aware of their father's sinful behavior. Stay forever and hope and pray her don't follow in daddy's footsteps? Stay forever and hope and pray he changes because it's soooo lonely and hurtful to be married to such a person?
     
  3. Lorelei

    Lorelei <img src ="http://www.amacominc.com/~lorelei/mgsm.

    Joined:
    May 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,045
    Likes Received:
    0


    Had you stuck to only these two points I might be able to agree. Unfortunately you found a bunch of unrelated verses and told us that to be a good christian you should even go so far as to remain married to an abuser rather than divorce. That is legalstic. My God desires mercy, not sacrifice.



    You picked 9 points that you think should be considered. Most of those did not have anything to do with divorce. This is an attempt at phariseeism to add rule upon rule to make sure you don't break the real ones.



    This list contradicts Paul's words that all things are permissable, just not beneficial.

    We have a freedom in Christ now. Yes, God wants all marriages to last, but in Christ I am not rotting in hell, or out of fellowship with God for having left my abusive husband.

    It's amazing the grace and love God bestows upon me each and every day.

    ~Lorelei
     
  4. Daniel David

    Daniel David New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, the principles I listed are for the character of all believers at all times. They don't just relate to divorce. It seems to me that you understood my post to relate only to divorce. I did point it out that in divorce they must be considered. They are universal truths though. Btw, I can create a situation for every principle in the Bible. Is that the point or is obedience the point?
     
  5. Daniel David

    Daniel David New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. They are universal principles true for the entire life of a believer. I suspect that you don't want them to apply to the divorce issue.

    Answer this, is it ever right to have a hard heart? If you think so, answer the verse I listed. Then answer where Jesus says that the ones seeking divorce are hardhearted.

    2. Again, they are universal. Therefore, they do apply.

    3. :rolleyes: I didn't see this one coming. :rolleyes:

    Tell me what rule I did break. Why is obedience equal to Phariseeism in your mind?

    Pharisees were lost people who tried to establish their own righteousness. I am not doing that at all. My righteousness is the imputed righteousness of Christ. What I have laid out is my theology of attitudes that relate to divorce. If that is what you disagree with, pick out a point a debate/discuss it. :rolleyes:
     
  6. Daniel David

    Daniel David New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. The "all things" are those things that people are uncertain of. They are "liberty" issues. Clearly, premarital sex is not permissable is it? Of course not. Paul had a particular issue in mind. Context is everything.

    2. Praise God.

    3. I don't believe a Christian is ever out of fellowship with God.

    4. Praise God. My hope is in his goodness, not mine, for I don't have any of my own.
     
  7. C.R. Gordon

    C.R. Gordon New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is a good book on this topic it's call "Different By Design" by John MacArthur
    you should check it out
    www.gty.org

    Our Sunday School class is going through this study right now (GOOD STUFF)
     
  8. Lorelei

    Lorelei <img src ="http://www.amacominc.com/~lorelei/mgsm.

    Joined:
    May 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,045
    Likes Received:
    0


    Indeed and each of the authors of these verses had a particular issue in mind and divorce was not necessarily one of them. Context is everything.



    It is not casting judgement on someone to recognize the fact they have chosen to ignore the word and continue to live in a sinful and dangerous environment. I chose to leave for my own safety and I chose to divorce to cleanse my life from the hurt that he willingly refused to repent of.

    If he were a member of your church, Paul would tell you to expel him from among you, not to keep from passing judgement.



    For better or for worse, means what the person taking the vow wants it to mean. The words are not scriptural. I would have honored our marriage no matter what we as a couple faced, "for better or for worse". What I would not do is allow for my husband to continue to abuse that vow by proclaiming to mean that I had to stay "for better or for worse" while he intentionaly made it worse for me with each and every punch.

    His vows to "love and cherish" were long gone way before I divorced him.



    Moses didn't permit me to divorce because of the hardness of my heart, I had nothing to do with the law.

    I divorced because of his hardness of heart and unwillingness to stop the abusive behavior. If he had stopped, I would have stayed.

    I have forgiven him, I just won't live with him any longer.



    Talking about how the author had another concept in mind. This was an illustration to show us that we are now dead to the law. He used a law to show us this example, but the point is, we are free from the old way of the law now and live in the new way of the spirit.

    The spirit will lead us to do the right thing, but this isn't speaking to divorce, merely giving an example from the law to show how the law is no longer valid.



    What is this even doing here? Are you assuming that everyone who divorces is trying to get "revenge" on the spouse?? Well, that is usually not the case. Believe me, if I wanted revenge, I would have done something worse than divorce the man.

    I have already stated how living in an abusive environment by choice is not suffering for righteousness sake.

    The whole court issue is irrelevant for if you beleive that to be so, you shouldn't be in a court of law getting a marriage license either. The state is only involved because they require it to be so, not because i chose to take thim to court.

    This list just isn't fruitful. It's based upon your interpretion of the scriptures and your assumption of what each and every divorce is about. I think the focus is all wrong. Instead of focusing on the divorce rate, change people's hearts and mind towards Christ, then they will do what is right before the marriage even begins.

    ~Lorelei
     
  9. Daniel David

    Daniel David New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Originally posted by Lorelei:

    1. Indeed and each of the authors of these verses had a particular issue in mind and divorce was not necessarily one of them. Context is everything.

    2. It is not casting judgement on someone to recognize the fact they have chosen to ignore the word and continue to live in a sinful and dangerous environment. I chose to leave for my own safety and I chose to divorce to cleanse my life from the hurt that he willingly refused to repent of.

    If he were a member of your church, Paul would tell you to expel him from among you, not to keep from passing judgement.

    3. For better or for worse, means what the person taking the vow wants it to mean.

    4. Moses didn't permit me to divorce because of the hardness of my heart, I had nothing to do with the law.

    5. This was an illustration to show us that we are now dead to the law. He used a law to show us this example, but the point is, we are free from the old way of the law now and live in the new way of the spirit.

    6.What is this even doing here?

    7. The whole court issue is irrelevant for if you beleive that to be so, you shouldn't be in a court of law getting a marriage license either.

    8. This list just isn't fruitful.

    9. Instead of focusing on the divorce rate, change people's hearts and mind towards Christ, then they will do what is right before the marriage even begins.

    ___

    1. The principles are for all Christians and deal with attitudes, which are universal.

    2. Two problems here. If you are talking about a lost person, he cannot obey God's word.

    3. For better or for worse might not be found in the Bible, but you still promised it. It is also unconditional. If each person had their own interpretation, it would be meaningless.

    I suppose I could also include where Jesus said not to take an oath. The reason he addressed this issue is because people would determine their own sincerity to actually keeping their word based on what they swore by. Therefore, let your yes be yes and your no be no.

    If you are talking about a saved person, you are forbidden to take him to court. Period.

    Church discipline is done with meekness always seeking to restore.

    4. I think you are missing the point. Jesus said that divorce was allowed under the Law. If you live under grace and not the law, divorce is forbidden. Jesus said, "...from the beginning it was not so..."

    5. The illustration would not hold up to scrutiny if it were not true. You are not merely divorced from the law. The only way you can be joined to Christ is to be dead to the law. The same is true for remarriage. That is exactly why Paul used this illustration.

    6. As I have said I don't know how many times, these are attitudes that all Christians at all times must avoid. Many do divorce with vengeance in mind. Some people think to themselves that since the other party cheated, I will divorce to get even. I have never said that all divorces are about revenge. :rolleyes:

    7. This is false because what is forbidden is not the legal system itself, but taking a fellow believer to court. Read 1 Cor. 6. Paul was embarrassed at their lack of knowledge in this area.

    8. Really? Which of these attitudes are ever right for a believer to have? No, it is not unfruitful. It is just very direct. It isn't the read your Bible and pray every day stuff we always hear. Such studies on attitudes pierce through all people (Heb. 4:12).

    9. That has been my goal. People act according to how they believe. Therefore, I have sought to point out only Scripture and not judge Scripture by my own experience.

    Just so you know, this study was never pointed at anyone. I posted it for the person who might be thinking of a divorce. It is still true for people who have, but it was directed toward those who were considering it.

    Also, as I have said before, any man that does not protect a woman but instead uses his strength to harm her, is no man at all. Such a person can use the full force of the law upon him. I have NEVER condoned spousal abuse of any kind.
     
  10. Walls

    Walls New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Messages:
    802
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was married to that type of person and after 14 years of putting up with it and praying, he got saved and he has surrendered to preach. It was a very rough road. But because of the experience, we are able to witness and testify of how God can work.

    Just wanted to add:

    I had every reason to divorce and go on with my life, but if I had done that, sin would have literal killed my husband. Because I endured the hard ship [​IMG] God gets the victory! Not only does God get the glory but we get a saved husband and daddy. That is worth the tribulation we had to endure. Also, my children got to see what kind of life sin produces and how God can work mightly in a persons life. More importantly, my children know that God is real, because they have seen God answer our prayers! [​IMG]

    [ January 30, 2003, 08:10 AM: Message edited by: Walls ]
     
  11. Lorelei

    Lorelei <img src ="http://www.amacominc.com/~lorelei/mgsm.

    Joined:
    May 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,045
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kal-el,

    I still think it is the wrong angle from which to handle the situation. If a person is considering a divorce, making them stay because they "have" to is not helping the situation. (though I continue to disagree that many of the reasons stated were even relevant)

    If a christian is truly considering divorce then there is something seriously wrong. Maybe what they need is a better understanding of God's grace and forgiveness. Once a person truly understands the love that God has for them, then and only then can they be able to share that kind of love with someone else, including their spouse.

    Many marital problems come from people feeling that their spouse is not fulfilling their needs. Well, no spouse can or ever will! Only Christ can fulfill those needs, and only when people realize that, will they be able to stop expecting the impossible from their spouse.

    People need to walk in the Spirit in order to keep from fulfilling the lusts of the flesh. To offer a lists of dos and don'ts to a person walking in the flesh encourages them to continue to try to please God through their own worthless efforts.

    I do realize that you do not condone spousal abuse, I just don't think you realize the impact such blanket statements could have on a person who is suffering from abuse. They could interpret it differently and that is where the danger lies. If you had explained exactly what kind of suffering you were referring to, it could have helped to clarify it.

    But I have made my point and this is your thread so I will back out now.

    ~Lorelei
     
  12. SAVED4LIFE

    SAVED4LIFE New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was married to that type of person and after 14 years of putting up with it and praying, he got saved and he has surrendered to preach. It was a very rough road. But because of the experience, we are able to witness and testify of how God can work.

    Just wanted to add:

    I had every reason to divorce and go on with my life, but if I had done that, sin would have literal killed my husband. Because I endured the hard ship [​IMG] God gets the victory! Not only does God get the glory but we get a saved husband and daddy. That is worth the tribulation we had to endure. Also, my children got to see what kind of life sin produces and how God can work mightly in a persons life. More importantly, my children know that God is real, because they have seen God answer our prayers! [​IMG]
    </font>[/QUOTE]WOW! Thanks! Your testimony really has helped me......thank you! Please pray for my situation as one who's "been there done that" and came out victorious! [​IMG] :cool:
     
Loading...