Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, when it costs them nothing, it is little valued. I know of students who dumped their “free” lunches in the trash. But not without cause. The fare was far from appetizing.IMHO Everyone should pay at least something- even if it is 25 cents!
This business of everything is free - is for the birds!
We need to teach responsibility.
And it is NOT free - someone is paying - and that someone is taxpayers
Sounds like a good plan. A healthy diet is essential to mental and physical growth. It is part of the mission of the public school system to educate children, and providing food helps them fulfill that mission. As a person who pays school taxes, I would gladly pay a little extra to ensure that all children have access to food so they can study.
It's quite similar to providing "free" textbooks, teachers, libraries, bus transportation, desks, etc. Most people don't get worked up about those things because many perceive "free lunches" as a giveaway to poor people. However, as a disciple of Christ (and someone who recognizes that God judges the nations by the way they treat the poor, the stranger, and the marginalized), I can't imagine being against someone else receiving good things..
And it is NOT free - someone is paying - and that someone is taxpayers
No, that doesn't make sense at all. That's a particularly bad example of the "slippery slope" logical fallacy.Apparently, very few Republicans or Democrats care about restricting the size, reach, and scope of government power as long as it is doing something that they regard as "good", while they fail to realize that giving government power to do things that they regard as "good" also means giving government power to do things they regard as "bad".
While Mr. Meyer may have had some good things to say, I place his thinking and opinions much lower than the teaching of Jesus and the biblical witness.As Frank S. Meyer put it...
The extreme individualism pushed by libertarian thinking is contrary to the message of Jesus
Government has been ordained by God to act for human flourishing
Since God judges the nations
we can know that God approves of both the church and state to serve the needs of the needy
Moreover, in the United States, the government is controlled by the people. In this specific case, the local school district is controlled by the local community. The local community has a high level of control over the policies and actions of the school district.
can not afford ??? I contend that many of these families can afford it - as they waste their money on unneeded things.I don't have a problem with feeding the children who cannot afford (or their parents cannot afford) to eat a healthy meal.
You contradict yourself. You quoted the part of the passage about paying taxes (wealth redistribution) and ignored the historical context of the passage in Romans.False.
Romans 13:6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
What is "this very thing" described before this verse? Maintaining law and order. It is not referring to redistributing wealth.
You are letting your neat and tidy theology restrict the plain teaching of the scriptures. I already quoted several relevant passages regarding how God judges the nations. We see that all the time in the Old Testament prophets. The “reprobate” nations are also judged according to their actions. Did you not read them and consider what they clearly said? Perhaps I gave you too many… Here is a shorter list:False. Every individual is judged based on Christ and His perfect righteousness. God's elect are in Christ and have already been judged in Him, their sins having been imputed to Christ and His perfect righteousness having been imputed to them. The reprobate are not in Christ and do not have Christ's perfect righteousness imputed to them.
Of course, but apparently the “gospel” you believe in is a “gospel” stripped of all of its social and moral implications. One cannot actually love one’s neighbor unless you love them in word and deed. Christian love demands being an advocate for the poor, disenfranchised, the stranger (including immigrants), and those who are oppressed. The Old and New Testament teaching demands it.False. The church that Christ established has as its mission the proclamation of the gospel of Christ.
You’ve just shown me you know nothing of church history, nor have seriously considered who loving one’s neighbors (and enemies) requires.The only benevolence we see the church, as a body, engaging in is among their own members, such as widows.
Sure, but that doesn’t mean that the church is not called to serve corporately.Now, individual members can do benevolence elsewhere.
Honestly, I don’t care about your political philosophy, what you call yourself, your political party, or whether or not you “fit in.” I care whether or not you are aligned with the teachings of Jesus and are following Him in discipleship. He is a wise and faithful teacher and will transform any failings you have into glory.Obviously, @Baptist Believer, we have different views on the proper size, reach, and scope of government. And that is fine. I quite realize that minarchism is out of favor and that, politically, I am out of place in 21st century America. Politically, I would be much more at home in the 1890s.
Many can afford it. Many others can send some kind of lunch, albeit not a healthy one.can not afford ??? I contend that many of these families can afford it - as they waste their money on unneeded things.
And yes, @KenH , it is federal dollars. And it is the federal government that decides what can be served.
NEGATIVE - NOT according to the Tenth amendment!
Now....should the entire school system get free lunches? I don't believe so.
At one time the churches and the community would step in and help. But those days are gone.