Pastor_Bob
Well-Known Member
I'll have to admit, this well-reasoned rebuttal just about stumped me. :applause:How do you know what he has seen?
Simply put, if he had seen it, he would have corrected it. It's what we do.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'll have to admit, this well-reasoned rebuttal just about stumped me. :applause:How do you know what he has seen?
Let's examine your position.
"he is dead to God."
What does that mean?
What does it mean to be dead to God?
What does the word "dead" mean, in a scriptural sense. Define it and then back it up with Scripture.
You have much truth in what you say but you are confused. Alienated is a good word. It simply means "separated" which is what the word "dead" means. It means that we are separated from God, or alienated from him by sin as you pointed out. It is NOT, as the Calvinist presupposes, lifelessness or in the likeness of a spiritual corpse. That is not what it means. You gave scripture where it simply means alienated; separated. When a person is separated by God from sin, they are still able to respond.dhk:
You have been reading my other thread, and I have already given you the definition of what being dead to God means, because its one of the many reasons man must be born again.
But I will accommodate the question this time. It means to be alienated from the Life of God. Eph 4:18
Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
Also it means to be dead in Trespasses and sins Eph 2:1
1And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;
The word dead nekros:
spiritually dead
1) destitute of a life that recognises and is devoted to God, because given up to trespasses and sins
Thats alienation from God and the Life of God in Eph 4:18
Now is that scripture enough for you ?
Apparently not...and no you don't. Calling free will being of lucifer is lacking in any kind of grace and is an attack no matter how politely and sugar coated you try to make it sound.I'll have to admit, this well-reasoned rebuttal just about stumped me. :applause:
Simply put, if he had seen it, he would have corrected it. It's what we do.
Yes.The word accept is a VERB and it means:
Eph.2:8. The gift of God. What is it? It is salvation.to take or receive (something offered); receive with approval or favor: to accept a present; to accept a proposal.
Receiving is a verb, but receiving is not a work. Work is doing; receiving is not doing; not working. Neither is faith. Faith is not a work. Go back to the drawing board.So if one denies that they did anything to become saved , but only accepted a gift, they have just lied to you.
If you are offered a glass of water, and refuse it, what work did you do?The difference between saved and lost for them was their performance, whereas another who had the same gift offered them but refused to accept it, then it was because they did not perform the action of accepting.
Apparently you don't know what salvation by grace is and how to obtain it.So they made themselves to differ, thats boasting, thats the religion of the man of sin, the freewill religion. Its a flat out repudiation of Salvation by Grace.
SBM here is what you did:In my opinion the freewill religion is of Lucifer Isa 14:12-14
12How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
This my friends epitomizes the concept of freewill, I WILL..
Yes.
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: (John 1:12)
Receive him; accept him; one is unsaved if they don't. Don't listen to Calvin; listen to the Bible.
Eph.2:8. The gift of God. What is it? It is salvation.
For by grace are you saved through faith, it is the gift of God (i.e., salvation). Salvation must be received. It must be accepted. You cannot be saved any other way.
Receiving is a verb, but receiving is not a work. Work is doing; receiving is not doing; not working. Neither is faith. Faith is not a work. Go back to the drawing board.
If you are offered a glass of water, and refuse it, what work did you do?
It is NOT, as the Calvinist presupposes, lifelessness or in the likeness of a spiritual corpse.
Thus the command: Seek ye the Lord while he yet may be found.
A command which commands us to seek him of our own will.
One is separated from God but has the ability to seek God.
Receiving is a verb, but receiving is not a work. Work is doing;
dhk:
Yes it is, its a performance of an action, I just showed proof of that. That defines a work perfectly. Receive is something man does. God does not receive for man !
as God gives him a "NEW HEART" t
God does not receive for man but God does provide man the ability to receive salvation as God gives him a "NEW HEART" that is receptive to the gospel, without which man WILL NOT receive it.
dw:
The giving of a New Heart is being saved. That is how man receives salvation experientially. See, the fallacy is thinking that to receive something from God means that it was offered to them. Thats not true, especially in the realm of Salvation and redemption. To receive means mostly that something has been given, communicated effectually to.
When Paul said that He received His Ministry from the Lord as here Acts 20:24
But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God.
That does not mean that Jesus Christ offered Him the Ministry as an option for Him to either accept or reject. He received it because God made Him a Minister by the effectual working of His Power and Grace Eph 3:7
7Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power.
You see that ? In Acts 20:24 He said he received the Ministry. The word received there is the greek word lambano :
to receive (what is given), to gain, get, obtain, to get back
Its in the indicative mood meaning it is a simple statement of Fact that He received the Ministry from the Lord, yet it does not mean at all that the ministry was an option for him to reject or accept.
Paul was made a Minister, Sovereignly by God's Power and Grace, that is how He received it.
God gives His elect a New Heart, Sovereignly, that in itself is subjective salvation, Paul says He saved us [ subjectively] How Paul ?
5Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
So you error in bringing in the element of God giving man the ability to receive salvation as you stated here:
Mans ability has absolutely nothing to do with him receiving Salvation. Thats like saying God gives man the ability to receive a New Heart ! A New Heart is Salvation experientially !It is a New Creation ! Ezk 11:
And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh:
Nothing about mans ability at all, its all God's doing.
When man receives the word, the Gospel of their salvation, they are being informed by God of their salvation, they are gaining a knowledge of it, it is being revealed to them. Rom 1:16-17
16For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
17For therein[The Gospel] is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
Please go back and read the OP, and be careful with what you are agreeing to. You are agreeing with someone who is stating that all who believe in such verses as John 3:16; 5:24; Rom.10:13; Acts 16:31; 10:43; etc. have the religion of the Antichrist. This is a serious charge against not only the Bible, but many of those here who believe the Bible. The Bible states very clearly:Well said, I agree!
Please go back and read the OP, and be careful with what you are agreeing to. You are agreeing with someone who is stating that all who believe in such verses as John 3:16; 5:24; Rom.10:13; Acts 16:31; 10:43; etc. have the religion of the Antichrist. This is a serious charge against not only the Bible, but many of those here who believe the Bible. The Bible states very clearly:
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.
There is a responsibility of the unsaved to believe. Even Calvin and Spurgeon taught this. So does MacArthur. To deny this belief is to deny basic soteriology. We have a responsibility, given to us by God, to believe the gospel. This poster, SBG, says that that responsibility is a religion connected with the Antichrist--Satan. This is blasphemy--a blasphemy that you are now agreeing to.
You are agreeing with someone who is stating that all who believe in such verses as John 3:16; 5:24; Rom.10:13; Acts 16:31; 10:43; etc. have the religion of the Antichrist.
There is a responsibility of the unsaved to believe. Even Calvin and Spurgeon taught this. So does MacArthur. To deny this belief is to deny basic soteriology. We have a responsibility, given to us by God, to believe the gospel. This poster, SBG, says that that responsibility is a religion connected with the Antichrist--Satan. This is blasphemy--a blasphemy that you are now agreeing to.
You really believe this trash??You are distorting this man! The truth is that he is stating that all who interpret such verses as John 3:16; 5:24; Rom. 10:13; Acts 16:31 ect. as YOU do embrace an aspect of the Antichrist religion.
So we see that the Man of Sin Religion That Man has a freewill in this Matter of Salvation has a Pretentious view of Man ! Man denies his total inability in Spiritual matters, denies that he is dead to God.
Next, this Freewill or Man of sin religion has a Degrading view of God !
As someone who has called calvinism a "damnable heresy" (something I would not say) I am surprised you are allowing this to occur.
Please demonstrate where one individual on this board takes credit for his own salvation or take back this baseless remark.The man of sin religion, the freewill religion takes credit to themselves for believing the word of Truth, and in doing so, takes credit for their trusting, resulting in their salvation..
You really believe this trash??
[/U][/B]