I am under the impression that there are some on this BB who do not believe that two people can be friends if they disagree with each other.
From personal experience I know this is not true.
I just finished reading Paul Tillich's "My Travel Diary: 1936 Between Two Worlds".
Paul Tillich and Karl Barth did not agree with each other's man's theology and yet they were friends. Here is a quote from pp 117-118 of the book.
From personal experience I know this is not true.
I just finished reading Paul Tillich's "My Travel Diary: 1936 Between Two Worlds".
Paul Tillich and Karl Barth did not agree with each other's man's theology and yet they were friends. Here is a quote from pp 117-118 of the book.
At 11:30 AT Karl Barth's. Extremely animated friend-to-friend conversation in which we traded insults. I tell him about Barth in America whereupon he declares that under the circumstances he won't have to go there. I say that, that unlike him, I feel closer to the early Christians than to the Reformation; that, for me, the criterion is all-important; that I feel his letter contradicted his theology. ........... We part as great friends.
I think it becomes obvious that two mature people can disagree, even on theology, and yet be good friends.