• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

From ‘Manholes’ to ‘Maintenance holes’

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When I first noticed the link to this on Facebook, I thought it was a Babylon Bee satire. But, no...
‘Manholes’ to ‘Maintenance holes’: California city bans gender-specific words in code
Berkeley, California, has adopted an ordinance to replace some terms with gender-neutral words in the city code.

The San Francisco Chronicle reports Wednesday that “she” and “he” will be replaced by “they.” The words “manpower” and “manhole” will become “workforce” and “maintenance hole.”

The City Council on Tuesday unanimously passed the measure to replace more than two dozen commonly used terms. There will be no more “craftsmen” in city code, only “craftspeople” or “artisans.”
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually, Berkeley held off for more than forty years. It was Florida and other 'non-California' towns that started all this, but that doesn't fit the narrative of the OP's Fox New story.

1974 - Satellite Beach, Florida mayor signs requisition for 'personhole covers'

1976 - Woonsocket, Rhode Island city council deems manhole cover term sexist
I don't know how progressive Berkeley is compared to some other towns that might have already made the step they have, but the two linked incidents from over 40 years ago only relate to one word, and in the Florida report it is not even an official change. In that case a female clerk for the city requisitioned a personhole cover and the mayor approved the requisition.

As far as the narrative of Fox's story, the San Francisco Chronicle article linked shows a page of the words that are being changed. Some not too progressive -- fireman to firefighter, which is probably already pretty commonly used -- but on the other hand all gender pronouns are being rooted out. The significance seems to be more in the thoroughgoing nature of the changes than about "manhole" specifically. Other cities may have beat them to the punch in that regard, but the two examples from the 70s fall far short.
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
Actually, Berkeley held off for more than forty years. It was Florida and other 'non-California' towns that started all this, but that doesn't fit the narrative of the OP's Fox New story.

1974 - Satellite Beach, Florida mayor signs requisition for 'personhole covers'

1976 - Woonsocket, Rhode Island city council deems manhole cover term sexist
This may be taking it to the next level. They are omitting a host of pronoun occurrences as well, instead requiring some noun descriptors be repeatedly exclusively used. They give a two-page list, including ‘felon,’ ‘individual,’ ‘person,’ ‘prisoner,’ ‘trespasser,’ ‘The Public Records Officer,’ and even ‘The Secondhand Dealer,’ all requiring their pronounless approach.

Berkeley gender neutral language ordinance
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
When I first noticed the link to this on Facebook, I thought it was a Babylon Bee satire. But, no...
‘Manholes’ to ‘Maintenance holes’: California city bans gender-specific words in code
By the way, I liked the apropos sewer cover pic. But there are other, more worrisome points in the original article.


The measure follows a move in February that allowed city employees to opt for preferred pronouns on their name badges.

And then there's this:

Critics have suggested the council should spend time on other things, Robinson said, but he pointed to the other items he considered important on Tuesday’s agenda, which included an ordinance to make Berkeley the first city in the country to prohibit natural gas infrastructure in new buildings.​

Makes one wonder how they expect sane people to handle what they put out. :Wink
 

Wingman68

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I’m pretty offended by the word hole being uttered with any of these prefixes, or being uttered at all!
 

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Get in line. You're on the lower end of the totem pole of who gets to be perpetually offended. :eek:
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There is absolutely no reason for gender elimination.

Except that Progressive globalist, marxists and socialists have so little else other than the platform of death (Abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, eugenics) they have to manufacture issues (oh ya - climate change - duh, sunny today, rainy tomorrow).
 
Top