Gail Riplinger video

Does sound familiar.

 

</font>[/QUOTE]Yes it is. It is in the book New Age Bible Versions - which I do have.

 

Haven't you guys about killed this horse yet?
It appears that it is the SAME guys beating this horse as they who did in the LAST Riplinger thread.

I Don't like her "logic". So I move on without her. No prob.!

In HIS service;
Jim

 

^^^

That's probably the BEST post av1611jim has made that I've seen in a while!

 

No more that you and other KJVO's have killed others.

Moving on.

 

C4K;
Stunned is probably an understatement. Yes?
Frankly her "acronyms" remind me of the Anti-christ junk I heard in the early 80's. VICAR = 666! And so on and so on...
Speaking of which; IF some clown is able to identify the A/C, just what EXACTLY will he be able to do about it? That is a puzzler.
Anyway...off topic. Sorry.
Perhaps she has good intentions ??? but alas, she did nothing more than heap contempt on a position held by many good godly folks. Folks who are every bit as educated as they who hold opposite positions. The ONLY difference is in point of view concerning the body of evidence available.
She and her theories will fade, as has many other "fads" in christendom. That is, unless of course, folks WON'T just let it die a natural death.
JMO

In HIS service;
Jim

 

So then we should place our trust in the hands of men like you when it comes to the Word of God? Which men like you are not really certain what is the Word and what is NOT? Methinkest NOT!! But then there is this "hierarchy" that DEMANDS they be the authority when it comes to the Word of God, and not God.

 

I think it is a good idea to talk about all of her beliefs. If you don't know what a heretic actually believes and teaches, it is difficult to set people straight when they are exposed to it.

That is why we study Mormonism and other cults.

Riplinger is even worse because she is going right into Baptist Churches and preaching this nonsense. If you don't believe that, go look at the tapes on the website shown above. In one the pastor welcomes her back to his church where she continues to spout her blatant lies. While the good Baptist gentlemen in the audience supply her with plenty of "Amens".

In my opinion it is an EXCELLENT idea to discuss all of her false doctrines. Especially since she mixes in just enough truth to confuse people.

You would think she would have all of her of stuff memorized. In every film she has to go page by page from a notebook. If I were preaching something that contriversial, I would certainly be able to rattle it off without having to look at notes. She appears lost without them.

 

So then we should place our trust in the hands of men like you when it comes to the Word of God?</font>[/QUOTE] Nope. Nor should you place your trust in the men who made up KJVOnlyism. In fact that may be a key difference between me and them. They would demand that you trust them. I tell you to only trust the Bible and honest arguments from the evidence. If someone has to speak where the Bible is silent or make-up/deny evidence then they aren't trustworthy.

Riplinger, Gipp, Marres, Cloud, et al. are not trustworthy. They aren't honest with the evidence nor with the implications of what the Bible says about itself.

You should place your trust in what the Bible actually says about itself along with an interpretation of the evidence that is intellectually honest and consistent with biblical principles.

I am certain what is the Word and what isn't. I am not certain nor is anyone honest about the providentially preserved evidence about what the words of the originals were verbatim. Thank God that we can know what He said without knowing precisely every word He used to say it.

Quite possibly one of the great understatements I have seen since joining here.

That would be on your side, not mine.

Please show me where God said what you dogmatically assert as truth. I can show you a clear biblical case for what I will not compromise on and will be honest enough to admit when something is just my opinion.

In my opinion, if you made a scale with the Byzantine on one end and the Alexandrian on the other... the originals would lie between but skewed toward the Byzantine. This is an opinion.

I know that God preserved His Word. I know He did not see fit to preserve a particular "perfect" set of words in the original languages much less another language. The evidence clearly demonstrates this. I know that He inspired the originals and that inspiration was directly tied to very special qualifications held by a select group of men who God chose to pen scripture.

I know that what God chose to reveal of Himself and His plan is faithfully represented in several English translations that includes but is not limited to the KJV.

 

She goes on like
this for 1200 pages
in IN AWE OF THY WORD (AV Publications group, 2003).

 

And rhymes with "moo".

Hebrews 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.

Got milk?

 

Does anybody know where the post was that had the links to the debates with Riplinger in audio format? I was listening to those, but didn't get to finish and now I have lost the link.

Any help would be appreciated.

Phillip

 

Never mind. I found it. KJVO exposes Ruckman, top of second page. I must have overlooked it.

Thanks anyway!

 

Obviously, that's not it either. ...still need help.