Case closed.
Well, that is that then.
Moderator please close this thread. :smilewinkgrin:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Case closed.
The propsed Arizona law specifically tells Hawaii what must be on their birth certificates. This is clearly being done specifically on the basis of one case.
I would not have an issue if the state simply required a prospective candidate to prove his national born citizenship. If President Obama's passport list his place of birth as USA both his home state and the federal government recognise that he was born in the US.
Case closed.
If this law passes I could not get on the ballot in Arizona. According to the link in the OP it requires the doctor's signature plus two witnesses. My Alaska birth certificate only has the doctor and one attending nurse.
So can Arizona dictate that I don't meet the requirement to be a natural born citizen in their state?
If so, where is this going to lead with state after state adding new proof requirements?
And if a candidate fails to prove eligibility - why would you want to allow them to be on the ballot?
Why would any state refuse to place him on the ballot?
Apparently Alaska did not require it. No room for their signatures. Besides, dads were not normally in the room hack then.
If a candidate fails to meet a state's requirements then the state should not place that candidate on its ballot.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court might weigh in on the whether or not a particular state's requirements pass constitutional muster and force a particular state to change its requirements.
Also, if I was under oath and was asked if I believe that Barack Obama meets the constitutional citizenship requirement to be president I would have to say that I do not know. A lot of legitimate questions have been raised on this board and elsewhere that need to cleared up by President Obama.
Unless I'm mistaken, I had to provide a copy of my birth certificate to attend grade school, attend college, serve in the military, get a security clearance, get my occupational licenses, get married, get at least one driver license, etc. and every time it had to be a certified copy of the original ...
Dragon, you are missing the point - all the things you listed are very important activities - for which a certified copy would be required.
With Obama, we are only talking about being President of the United States - you know - no big deal. Now do you understand?
If Barack Obama does not meet a state's ballot eligibility requirements in 2012 then he should not be on that state's ballot.
Also, if I was under oath and was asked if I believe that Barack Obama meets the constitutional citizenship requirement to be president I would have to say that I do not know. A lot of legitimate questions have been raised on this board and elsewhere that need to cleared up by President Obama.
Now, does that satisfy you, carpro?
...The law could be as simple as this - 'Any candidate desiring to be listed on the state's ballot for president must provide evidence of his status as a natural born citizen.'
That could be left up to interpretation as to what would be accepted as evidence. Suppose the mother said, "Well, its right here in our family Bible"... How about a newspaper article - actually, there was one for BO- would that be sufficient?