Hear that @Squire Robertsson?
Last edited:
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Georgia secretary of state says Lindsey Graham implied he should try to throw away ballots
- Thread starter robustheologian
- Start date
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
You didn't finish my quote....
That would be "hear" that. As in "hear" the premise to the argument before you start crying those Liberal tears
Here's some more liberal tears.That would be "hear" that. As in "hear" the premise to the argument before you start crying those Liberal tears:
Georgia's Recount Confirms Biden's Lead; AP Declares Him State's Winner
And I got some numbers for ya...306-232.
Oh...I forgot counting is a tough thing for you guys.
Oh...I forgot counting is a tough thing for you guys.
#1 Only legal votes count.
#2 The process of establishing "legal votes" is not completed yet.
#3 AP doesn't declare the winner, never did, never will.
#4 You are really having trouble paying attention to the premises. Please take a class in Basic Logic and Critical Thinking Skills or something.
1. Legal votes were counted. Is that poisoned well thinking that's getting you guys kicked out the White House.#1 Only legal votes count.
#2 The process of establishing "legal votes" is not completed yet.
#3 AP doesn't declare the winner, never did, never will.
#4 You are really having trouble paying attention to the premises. Please take a class in Basic Logic and Critical Thinking Skills or something.
2. The process of establishing legal votes?!? You're begging the question.
3. Semantics I'm sure will elude you but the media doesn't declare as in make the winner, they look at the numbers and read (or declare) what they say.
4. It's hilarious seeing the words class, logic, and critical thinking used by a Trump supporter....though the basic part definitely fits.
#1 There you go missing the premise (“legality not established yet”) again. You follow by fallaciously begging the question that the votes are legal in neglect of the premise that law suits have been filed which demonstrates this fallacy of you begging the question. P.S. you obviously don't know the philosophical meaning of "poisoned well" - pretender.1. Legal votes were counted. Is that poisoned well thinking that's getting you guys kicked out the White House.
#2 It is a factual truth that this process to establish the legality is in motion, therefore my saying it is yet to be established, is true, and your begging the question that it has been established, which you think it is "poisoning the well" to rebut your conclusion2. The process of establishing legal votes?!? You're begging the question.
3# You might want to look up, Appeal to Authority Fallacy. And... There you go forgetting the premise and begging the question again, those numbers mean no such thing (BTQ) and AP’s opinion means squat (ATA).3. Semantics I'm sure will elude you but the media doesn't declare as in make the winner, they look at the numbers and read (or declare) what they say.
#4 If you can’t recognize that entire argument as a fallacy and its rhetorical worthlessness, there is little hope for you improving your Basic Logic and Critical thinking Skills.4. It's hilarious seeing the words class, logic, and critical thinking used by a Trump supporter....though the basic part definitely fits.
Your horse-laugh finish back @ you:
1. Wait!!#1 There you go missing the premise (“legality not established yet”) again. You follow by fallaciously begging the question that the votes are legal in neglect of the premise that law suits have been filed which demonstrates this fallacy of you begging the question. P.S. you obviously don't know the philosophical meaning of "poisoned well" - pretender.
#2 It is a factual truth that this process to establish the legality is in motion, therefore my saying it is yet to be established, is true, and your begging the question that it has been established, which you think it is "poisoning the well" to rebut your conclusion, is false.
3# You might want to look up, Appeal to Authority Fallacy. And... There you go forgetting the premise and begging the question again, those numbers mean no such thing (BTQ) and AP’s opinion means squat (ATA).
#4 If you can’t recognize that entire argument as a fallacy and its rhetorical worthlessness, there is little hope for you improving your Basic Logic and Critical thinking Skills.
Your horse-laugh finish back @ you:
You're accusing me of begging the question the whole time you're doing it?!? You're basically making the assumption that because a frivolous lawsuit was filed that votes are questionably illegal. You clearly don't know what "poisoning the well" or "begging the question" means. 2. The process to establish the legality?!? There goes the whole "begging the question" thing you have no idea about.
And facts?!? Says who??3. Ah ah ah...your lack of comprehension skills are showing.
You just missed the part where I said the AP doesn't have the authority to make a winner but are instead reading the count from the election authorities.4. I do agree that your entire argument is fallacious
...as far as rhetorical worthlessness, judging by the spacing, you're just copying and pasting a bunch of malarkey. I'm glad you used the word "basic" again, though. That seems to be the one that suits you best.
I agree, as the only words I copied and pasted were yours.
Educate yourself about what happening in the process and why, I'd hate see you not prepared for your bubble bursts.
Biden has been the leading gun salesman this year and try to find ammo in stock. People are also stockpiling groceries in anticipation of bad times caused by massive fraud by Biden. And California is just one example of what Biden has in mind for us by forcing strict Chinese virus laws on the common man while rich Democrats wallow in luxury oblivious to their lies about lockdowns being good. No one respects Biden.
Why? It's time to call out the wolves for what they are.
Please do...go ahead.