Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The volcanic contributions to atmospheric interuptions is understood by every genuine scientist.
The ones blaming "global warming" on mankind
are disingenuous and are probably being compensated by entities who will benefit the fostering of this false notion.
Jim1999 said:If the globe isn't going through a warming cycle, why is the frozen north seeing their water thawing earlier and earlier each year?
I am no scientist, but I can see what is happening. England is getting weather I never saw before; Canada is seeing milder winters and dry summers.
There is a lot of pollution and we are cutting down more forests...We need to cut back on the pollution and cut back on destroying the forests.
Cheers,
Jim
carpro said:And there is plenty of scientific evidence that it's not.
Therein lies the problem. Nothing even remotely resembling a concensus amongst those scientists qualified in the field of climatology.
Such statements suggest that there might be substantive disagreement in the scientific community about the reality of anthropogenic climate change. This is not the case.
In the last two years, a remarkable amount of disturbing news has been published concerning global warming, largely concentrating on melting of polar ice, tropical storms and hurricanes, and mass extinctions. The sheer volume of these stories appears to be moving the American political process toward some type of policy restricting emissions of carbon dioxide.
It is highly improbable, in a statistical sense, that new information added to any existing forecast is almost always “bad” or “good”; rather, each new finding has an equal probability of making a forecast worse or better. Consequently, the preponderance of bad news almost certainly means that something is missing, both in the process of science itself and in the reporting of science.
Needless to say, the unreported information is usually counter to the bad news. Reports of rapid disintegration of Greenland’s ice ignore the fact that the region was warmer than it is now for several decades in the early 20th century, before humans could have had much influence on climate.
Similar stories concerning Antarctica neglect the fact that the net temperature trend in recent decades is negative, or that warming the surrounding ocean can serve only to enhance snowfall,
Global warming affects hurricanes in both positive and negative fashions, and there is no relationship between the severity of storms and ocean-surface temperature, once a commonly exceeded threshold temperature is reached.
Reports of massive species extinction also turn out to be impressively flawed.[/qutoe]
There are massive exitinctions going on, but most of them are due to loss of habitat, mostly by other human activities.
The Galatian said:I'm kinda surprised that this "global warming expert" isn't aware that local cooling and increased snowfall at the poles is part of the global warming model.
Apparently, according to the "humans are causing global warming" crackpots, everything is the result of human-caused global warming - hotter weather, colder weather, more snow, less snow, more ice, less ice, more rain, less rain, etc., etc., etc.
The Galatian said:Barbarian is amused by the self styled "climate expert" who doesn't know that local cooling and increased precipitation at the poles is part of the model for global warming
almost any fool can "debunk" the truth for you.
El_Guero said:Why agree to disagree . . .
Can't we all just get along and agree for once?