RayMarshall19
New Member
1) For those who aren't familiar with the expression, I found a legal definition of "arbitrary and capricious" that fits this discussion: ABSENCE OF A RATIONAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE FACTS FOUND AND THE CHOICE MADE.Originally posted by UTEOTW:
"THIS STATEMENT IS JUST PLAIN STUPID. EVOLUTION REQUIRES THAT SOMETHING NEW BE CREATED AND PASSED ON TO THE NEXT GENERATION. YOU CAN SAVE ALL THE "CENTS" YOU WANT FOR AS LONG AS YOU WANT. IN THE END THEY WILL STILL BE JUST A BUNCH OF CENTS."
It is not a stupid statement. He is pointing out that if you accept small changes as fact, there is no reason to draw a line which limits how much accumulated small changes are possible. It is an arbitrary and capricious distinction to separate the two.
So your analogy of "THEY WILL STILL BE JUST A BUNCH OF CENTS" is flawed.
The ASSUMPTION that "small changes" (whatever that means) will eventually produce a new species from an existing one clearly meets this definition of "arbitrary and capricious". There is no connection betwen the facts and this assumption (choice). I am not the one guilty of this mistake.
2) "there is no reason to draw a line"? Yes, there is a good reason to draw a line where the facts end and supposition based upon assumption begins.
3) The "CENTS" example was his, not mine, and I stand by my original evaluation. Science does not supply a "species store" in which to spend your "small changes" to "buy" a species.