But you reject Paul. As long as you do Romans 9 will not justify your position.
I do not reject Paul.
I do reject your false ideas that you attempt to inject into passages by way of eisegesis.
I reject your use of 1689 in your name when you deny what the 1689 teaches.
I do not think you understand Rom9, or Titus2.
Reading reformed theology in the flesh, and twisting it, causes the way of truth to be evil spoken of.
Your professed beliefs are not really found anywhere in any confession of faith, or in any reformed teaching that I am aware of.
You can believe whatever you want, but such error I will oppose, more than I would the daily error of the anti Cal posse who oppose themselves everyday.
They do not know what they do not know.
You have posted that you do know, when it looks like you do not see what you post that you do profess.
You are coming after any Cal.who are with one voice offering you correction.
Even none Cals have noticed this, and say the same exact thing.