Thesis
My thesis is that God uses single predestination to choose certain elect individuals from before birth. This is equivalent to the special grace shown to those like Isaac and Jacob. God may also be using double predestination concerning certain individuals who seem destined to perdition from before birth such as Pharaoh, Judas, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet. However, God has made it so that most of His creatures are saved through a resistible Call to faith, a Call to faith that always requires mercy and compassion on God’s part. A Call that originates from God through Nature, Law, or Gospel and must find its resolution in Jesus Christ and the Cross. A Call the vast majority of humanity has rejected. God also hardens people, potentially to damnation, for His own purposes, as in the case of Pharaoh. A hardening that may be removed at a later time in a person or group’s lifetimes, as I will argue happened to the Jews of the apostolic era.
To start presenting this thesis I will reference Romans 9-11, which gave me the idea.
This thread is an invitation to check my bible study. In another thread, in the next few days, I will post a more philosophical critique of both current Calvinist and Arminian doctrine with the intention of finding a third way.
I will establish what is on topic for this thread and ask the moderators to enforce it if need be. This debate is whether my thesis is biblical. Of special importance to this is whether I interpret the text of Romans 9-11 correctly.
Romans 9-11 Bible Study
Romans 9:1-5
9 I am telling the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience testifies with me in the Holy Spirit, 2 that I have great sorrow and unceasing grief in my heart. 3 For I could [a]wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, 5 whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed [c]forever. Amen.
*God through Paul communicates Paul’s grief and sorrow. He could wish to be cut off and sent to hell if it was for the sake of his fellow Israelites.
*Paul explains the many blessings God has given the Israelites, a chosen nation in which Christ was incarnated as one of their own.
*Note how the end of verse 5 exalts Christ amidst such grief and sorrow.
*Before continuing, it is important to state that the rest of Romans 9 is the most offensive section of scripture to modern mankind.
Romans 9:6-16
6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7 nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s [d]descendants, but: “[e]through Isaac your [f]descendants will be named.” 8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as [g]descendants. 9 For this is the word of promise: “At this time I will come, and Sarah shall have a son.” 10 And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; 11 for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would [h]stand, not because of works but [j]because of Him who calls, 12 it was said to her, “The older will serve the younger.” 13 Just as it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”
14 What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? May it never be! 15 For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” 16 So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy.
*God has sovereign choice to choose whom He wants for blessing. He can have compassion and mercy on whom He wants from before birth, as shown in Jacob and Esau with God’s choice of Jacob over Esau, the older brother. This was to show that God’s choice of people to blessing is irrespective of their deeds. The goodness of this reality for a God of innocent character is independent of the constructs for good and evil found among mankind. This is not capricious but an aspect of God's character.
*Notice how the true Israel are children of the promise like Isaac as opposed to Abraham’s other son, Ishmael. Being born a descendant of Abraham by flesh does not make one a child of promise, but instead the true Israel is made up of children of promise Called by God irrespective of deeds.
*Thus the mercy of God does not depend on an act of the will or any strength in individuals.
Romans 9:17-21
17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I raised you up, to demonstrate My power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed [k]throughout the whole earth.” 18 So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires.
19 You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20 On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21 Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel [l]for honorable use and another [m]for common use?
*This section reveals that God has sovereign choice to choose whom He wants for wrath. When mankind retorts that is unfair, God responds by saying does not a potter have a right to make the clay as he desires? That rankles our sense of justice. However, it is still within the character of an almighty and innocent God. Just as God chose Pharaoh for wrath in the Old Testament by hardening him and raising him up as Pharaoh, God has the ability to withhold compassion and mercy to whomever He wants from their creation.
Romans 9:22-29
22 [n]What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles. 25 As He says also in Hosea,
“I will call those who were not My people, ‘My people,’
And her who was not beloved, ‘beloved.’”
26 “And it shall be that in the place where it was said to them, ‘you are not My people,’
There they shall be called sons of the living God.”
27 Isaiah cries out concerning Israel, “Though the number of the sons of Israel be like the sand of the sea, it is the remnant that will be saved; 28 for the Lord will execute His word on the earth, [o]thoroughly and [p]quickly.” 29 And just as Isaiah foretold,
“Unless the Lord of [q]Sabaoth had left to us a [r]posterity,
We would have become like Sodom, and would have resembled Gomorrah.”
*This section is the fusion of the two previous concepts that God from creation can will that some be designated for mercy and compassion while others are designated for wrath. There is good in this that God can make His almighty power known by making some people to be objects of wrath from creation. People destined for hell. While others are to be made at their creation to be vessels of mercy to reveal the riches of His glory upon them. It is not beyond God's character or power to do these things, otherwise scripture would not say it is so with such frankness. Thus, God can make children of wrath and children of mercy, humans do not get a vote, no matter how “unfair” that seems.
*God through Paul compares the children of mercy to those Paul writes to both Jew and Gentile, including Paul himself. God foreknew this matter. Hosea shows that those who are not God’s people or beloved will be called His sons, His people, and His beloved. Isaiah shows that though Israel seem numerous, it was the remnant that would survive. That God, unless He had chosen a seed, then Israel would have been like Sodom and Gomorrah.
Romans 9:30-33
30 What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is [t]by faith; 31 but Israel, pursuing a law of righteousness, did not arrive at that law. 32 Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as though it were [v]by works. They stumbled over the stumbling stone, 33 just as it is written,
“Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense,
And he who believes in Him will not be [w]disappointed.”
*This section shows that the Gentiles have attained righteousness not by pursuing the Law but by faith. Meanwhile the Jews of Paul’s day pursued a law of righteousness through their works, and did not attain to that law of righteousness. The Jews of Paul’s day stumbled over the stumbling stone that is Jesus Christ.
My thesis is that God uses single predestination to choose certain elect individuals from before birth. This is equivalent to the special grace shown to those like Isaac and Jacob. God may also be using double predestination concerning certain individuals who seem destined to perdition from before birth such as Pharaoh, Judas, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet. However, God has made it so that most of His creatures are saved through a resistible Call to faith, a Call to faith that always requires mercy and compassion on God’s part. A Call that originates from God through Nature, Law, or Gospel and must find its resolution in Jesus Christ and the Cross. A Call the vast majority of humanity has rejected. God also hardens people, potentially to damnation, for His own purposes, as in the case of Pharaoh. A hardening that may be removed at a later time in a person or group’s lifetimes, as I will argue happened to the Jews of the apostolic era.
To start presenting this thesis I will reference Romans 9-11, which gave me the idea.
This thread is an invitation to check my bible study. In another thread, in the next few days, I will post a more philosophical critique of both current Calvinist and Arminian doctrine with the intention of finding a third way.
I will establish what is on topic for this thread and ask the moderators to enforce it if need be. This debate is whether my thesis is biblical. Of special importance to this is whether I interpret the text of Romans 9-11 correctly.
Romans 9-11 Bible Study
Romans 9:1-5
9 I am telling the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience testifies with me in the Holy Spirit, 2 that I have great sorrow and unceasing grief in my heart. 3 For I could [a]wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, 5 whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed [c]forever. Amen.
*God through Paul communicates Paul’s grief and sorrow. He could wish to be cut off and sent to hell if it was for the sake of his fellow Israelites.
*Paul explains the many blessings God has given the Israelites, a chosen nation in which Christ was incarnated as one of their own.
*Note how the end of verse 5 exalts Christ amidst such grief and sorrow.
*Before continuing, it is important to state that the rest of Romans 9 is the most offensive section of scripture to modern mankind.
Romans 9:6-16
6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7 nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s [d]descendants, but: “[e]through Isaac your [f]descendants will be named.” 8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as [g]descendants. 9 For this is the word of promise: “At this time I will come, and Sarah shall have a son.” 10 And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; 11 for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would [h]stand, not because of works but [j]because of Him who calls, 12 it was said to her, “The older will serve the younger.” 13 Just as it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”
14 What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? May it never be! 15 For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” 16 So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy.
*God has sovereign choice to choose whom He wants for blessing. He can have compassion and mercy on whom He wants from before birth, as shown in Jacob and Esau with God’s choice of Jacob over Esau, the older brother. This was to show that God’s choice of people to blessing is irrespective of their deeds. The goodness of this reality for a God of innocent character is independent of the constructs for good and evil found among mankind. This is not capricious but an aspect of God's character.
*Notice how the true Israel are children of the promise like Isaac as opposed to Abraham’s other son, Ishmael. Being born a descendant of Abraham by flesh does not make one a child of promise, but instead the true Israel is made up of children of promise Called by God irrespective of deeds.
*Thus the mercy of God does not depend on an act of the will or any strength in individuals.
Romans 9:17-21
17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I raised you up, to demonstrate My power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed [k]throughout the whole earth.” 18 So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires.
19 You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20 On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21 Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel [l]for honorable use and another [m]for common use?
*This section reveals that God has sovereign choice to choose whom He wants for wrath. When mankind retorts that is unfair, God responds by saying does not a potter have a right to make the clay as he desires? That rankles our sense of justice. However, it is still within the character of an almighty and innocent God. Just as God chose Pharaoh for wrath in the Old Testament by hardening him and raising him up as Pharaoh, God has the ability to withhold compassion and mercy to whomever He wants from their creation.
Romans 9:22-29
22 [n]What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles. 25 As He says also in Hosea,
“I will call those who were not My people, ‘My people,’
And her who was not beloved, ‘beloved.’”
26 “And it shall be that in the place where it was said to them, ‘you are not My people,’
There they shall be called sons of the living God.”
27 Isaiah cries out concerning Israel, “Though the number of the sons of Israel be like the sand of the sea, it is the remnant that will be saved; 28 for the Lord will execute His word on the earth, [o]thoroughly and [p]quickly.” 29 And just as Isaiah foretold,
“Unless the Lord of [q]Sabaoth had left to us a [r]posterity,
We would have become like Sodom, and would have resembled Gomorrah.”
*This section is the fusion of the two previous concepts that God from creation can will that some be designated for mercy and compassion while others are designated for wrath. There is good in this that God can make His almighty power known by making some people to be objects of wrath from creation. People destined for hell. While others are to be made at their creation to be vessels of mercy to reveal the riches of His glory upon them. It is not beyond God's character or power to do these things, otherwise scripture would not say it is so with such frankness. Thus, God can make children of wrath and children of mercy, humans do not get a vote, no matter how “unfair” that seems.
*God through Paul compares the children of mercy to those Paul writes to both Jew and Gentile, including Paul himself. God foreknew this matter. Hosea shows that those who are not God’s people or beloved will be called His sons, His people, and His beloved. Isaiah shows that though Israel seem numerous, it was the remnant that would survive. That God, unless He had chosen a seed, then Israel would have been like Sodom and Gomorrah.
Romans 9:30-33
30 What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is [t]by faith; 31 but Israel, pursuing a law of righteousness, did not arrive at that law. 32 Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as though it were [v]by works. They stumbled over the stumbling stone, 33 just as it is written,
“Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense,
And he who believes in Him will not be [w]disappointed.”
*This section shows that the Gentiles have attained righteousness not by pursuing the Law but by faith. Meanwhile the Jews of Paul’s day pursued a law of righteousness through their works, and did not attain to that law of righteousness. The Jews of Paul’s day stumbled over the stumbling stone that is Jesus Christ.
Last edited: