• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

God's Covenant with Abraham

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When man is commanded to seek, God has already made them spiritually alive. That command isnt to the natural man
Mark 1:15. "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the gospel." To whom is our Lord speaking here? Presumably to everyone within earshot. Suppose a 'natural man' should hear Him. What a terrible thing that would be!
 

Brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Mark 1:15. "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the gospel." To whom is our Lord speaking here? Presumably to everyone within earshot. Suppose a 'natural man' should hear Him. What a terrible thing that would be!
The same,people who are already spiritually prepared. The natural man may here the Gospel,but its foolishness to him,he doesnt have the capacity to understand it spiritually 1 Cor 2:14

14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Mark 1:15 is specifically for a prepared people Lk 1 17

And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
1 Cor. 2:14 is a given, and if you will kindly arrange for all 'natural men' to have a yellow stripe painted on their backs, I won't preach to them. But until you do, I will preach and witness to all and sundry and plead with them, exhort them, implore them and command them to repent and trust in Christ, for so my God has commanded me. Mark 1:15; Luke 14:23; Acts 17:30; 2 Corinthians 5:20-6:2; 2 Timothy 4:1-2. In that way I will play my small part in turning the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, and in making ready a people prepared for the Lord, for 'How shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the gospel of peace, who bring glad tidings of good things!"' (Romans 9:14-15).
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
@Martin Marprelate



Which gives evidence he was already regenerated, it was an effectual call , and that Faith is the fruit of the Spirit. Gal 5:22
Just so, but obedience is the evidence of regeneration. Just about all the heroes of faith in Hebrews 11 were people who went and did something. 'By faith Abraham obeyed....' "Therefore, King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision, but declared first to those in Damascus and in Jerusalem, and throughout the region of Judea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent, turn to God, and do works befitting repentance" (Acts 26:19-20; cf. James 3: 20ff).
 

Brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Just so, but obedience is the evidence of regeneration. Just about all the heroes of faith in Hebrews 11 were people who went and did something. 'By faith Abraham obeyed....' "Therefore, King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision, but declared first to those in Damascus and in Jerusalem, and throughout the region of Judea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent, turn to God, and do works befitting repentance" (Acts 26:19-20; cf. James 3: 20ff).
Yes obedience is an evidence of a new nature from regeneration.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It does not matter how one squeezes the words of the scriptures, the land of Canaan and the perpetual ownership and their physical occupation in it forever is a vital promise of the Abrahamic Covenant and if this cannot be believed, neither can anything else in the covenant.
I'm sorry not to have dealt with your post #12 before, but I've been struggling to get on the website at all recently.
Our differences are over hermeneutics. I believe that the O.T. must be understood though the lens of the N.T., specifically the words of the Lord Jesus Christ when He rebukes the Jewish leaders in John 5:38-40, and says, "These are the Scriptures that testify of Me."
In John 8:, our Lord says that He must bring other sheep into His fold and that there will only be one flock. This is amplified by Paul in Ephesians 2:11-22. There is only one people of God, believing Jew and believing Gentile together - 'one new man from the two'. This is not 'replacement theology' but Inclusion Theology: 'That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the Gospel.'

The 'Old' Covenant was always conditional (Exodus 19:5-6 etc.), and in Jeremiah 31:31, God proclaims a new covenant in which, instead of writing His laws on tablets of stone, He will write them on the hearts of His people. In Hebrews 8:13, we are told, 'In that He says, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.'

Psalm 105 cannot contradict the rest of the Bible. Jacob's version of the Abrahamic Covenant is not a different version to that given to Isaac and Abraham (Genesis 28:13-15). The land of Canaan stands for the whole earth (Romans 4:13), Zion is the Jerusalem above (Galatians 4:25-26) and the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is the Lord Jesus Christ and those that are in Him by faith. That there may yet be a great revival among the Jews I do not for a moment deny (Romans 11:23), but I pray not only for that, but for revival among the Moslem people, and at present there seems to be more evidence of the latter than the former.
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry not to have dealt with your post #12 before, but I've been struggling to get on the website at all recently.
Our differences are over hermeneutics.
Actually, Martin, our differences are not over hermeneutics so much as they are over our acceptance of the words we are given from God. God and Christians think with the same words but our thought patterns are much different. This is described in Isa 55 as God's thoughts being higher than our thoughts. The indwelling Spirit that is given to us when we are saved will teach us the spiritual value of those words. Therefore it is counter productive for us to seek different words in order to understand God. We must learn to think like God in the same words he thinks in. We actually have passages in the scriptures that tells us these things. 1 Cor chapter 2 is one example.
I believe that the O.T. must be understood though the lens of the N.T., specifically the words of the Lord Jesus Christ when He rebukes the Jewish leaders in John 5:38-40, and says, "These are the Scriptures that testify of Me."
The one thing you must learn about Jesus Christ is that he did not speak his own words. This fact is one reason that he is called the Word of God. Now I am not making that up because Jesus actually said it himself in John 12.
Joh 12:48 He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. 49 For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.
I hope you will read the context of those words and believe them. If there are any Reformed people that will believe them I have not met them yet.
In John 8:, our Lord says that He must bring other sheep into His fold and that there will only be one flock. This is amplified by Paul in Ephesians 2:11-22. There is only one people of God, believing Jew and believing Gentile together - 'one new man from the two'. This is not 'replacement theology' but Inclusion Theology: 'That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the Gospel.'
The church of Jesus Christ is an eternal body from it's beginning in Acts (AD 30). We have two (2) passages of scripture that says definitively when that beginning was. It was when Jesus came up from the dead. He is head of the body, and the firstborn son of God "from the dead"Col 1:18 and the body itself began to be formed in Acts 2 at the preaching of Peter according to Acts 11:15. Because a great number of people who post on this board are trained by religion to not believe the words in the scriptures, I don't expect many here to believe it.
Now, the church began with Jews only and later gentiles were added 10 years later in Acts 10. The Jewish apostles and prophets were the first members of the church and we are told that they were the foundation of the church
The 'Old' Covenant was always conditional (Exodus 19:5-6 etc.), and in Jeremiah 31:31, God proclaims a new covenant in which, instead of writing His laws on tablets of stone, He will write them on the hearts of His people. In Hebrews 8:13, we are told, 'In that He says, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.'
One reading your comments would believe the world began with Abraham. That is not the case. Two thousand years had passed before Abraham came along and God began to birth his own nation and make promises to them that did not apply to any other nation or people who existed previously or contemporaneous with them. The calling of Abraham represented a dispensational change in how God dealt with humanity, proving himself to the world through this family. This dispensation will last another two thousand years to the coming of Jesus Christ when once again a dispensational change will take place that will totally change this family and the rest of the world. Two thousand more years brings us to the final dispensational change when Jesus Christ returns to the earth for the second time and for the sabbath rest for the world and humanity.
During all this time God has not made a single covenant promise to gentiles concerning salvation. He has made a promise to Abraham that he will save gentiles through him and his seed. He even raised up a Jewish apostle to tell the gentiles this good news that he has included them in the promise of salvation.
Psalm 105 cannot contradict the rest of the Bible. Jacob's version of the Abrahamic Covenant is not a different version to that given to Isaac and Abraham (Genesis 28:13-15). The land of Canaan stands for the whole earth (Romans 4:13), Zion is the Jerusalem above (Galatians 4:25-26) and the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is the Lord Jesus Christ and those that are in Him by faith.
This is fanciful speculation without any truth to it, Martin. The problem with the Reformed is their tendency to spiritualize the scriptures. Nothing is true unless it props up your theology system. This causes sliding hermeneutics in the same contexts.
That there may yet be a great revival among the Jews I do not for a moment deny (Romans 11:23), but I pray not only for that, but for revival among the Moslem people, and at present there seems to be more evidence of the latter than the former.\
There is no revival. When Jesus comes again there will be few Jews left to deliver and Jesus will destroy all sinners from this earth, leaving few among the nations, but all of them saved.

Isa24:4 The earth mourneth and fadeth away, the world languisheth and fadeth away, the haughty people of the earth do languish.
5 The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.
6 Therefore hath the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate: therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left.
Read the context.

The Abrahamic Covenant is an everlasting covenant with Israel and is literal language.
 
Last edited:

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
JD731 said:
Actually, Martin, our differences are not over hermeneutics so much as they are over our acceptance of the words we are given from God.
Well, well. You think I do not accept the words we are given from God. I think you do not understand them.
The one thing you must learn about Jesus Christ is that he did not speak his own words.
John 6:63. 'The words I speak to you are spirit and they are life.' You may seek to drive a wedge between the Father and the Son; I do not.
The church of Jesus Christ is an eternal body from it's beginning in Acts (AD 30). We have two (2) passages of scripture that says definitively when that beginning was. It was when Jesus came up from the dead. He is head of the body, and the firstborn son of God "from the dead"Col 1:18 and the body itself began to be formed in Acts 2 at the preaching of Peter according to Acts 11:15. Because a great number of people who post on this board are trained by religion to not believe the words in the scriptures, I don't expect many here to believe it. [/QUOTE}
??? Why on earth would you suppose that I would not believe that?
Now, the church began with Jews only and later gentiles were added 10 years later in Acts 10. The Jewish apostles and prophets were the first members of the church and we are told that they were the foundation of the church
And.....? The Lord Jesus Christ says, "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself' (John 12:32). To be sure the first members of the Church were Jewish, but within not so many years (cf. Colossians 4:11) ,and ever since, the majority have been Gentile. Within just a few years of AD 70, according to F.F. Bruce, Curses against the Christians were made a part of Jewish Liturgy.
One reading your comments would believe the world began with Abraham
:Rolleyes Well, the title of this thread is 'God's covenant with Abraham.' If you want to make a point about the Tower of Babel, start another thread. Genesis 3:15, however, is not about Abraham or the Jews.
This is fanciful speculation without any truth to it, Martin.
I quoted three portions of Scripture, with none of which you saw fit to take issue. Maybe it is you who is given to fanciful speculation.
There is no revival. When Jesus comes again there will be few Jews left to deliver and Jesus will destroy all sinners from this earth, leaving few among the nations, but all of them saved.
Revelation 7:9-10. 'After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could number, of all nations, tribes, peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, "Salvation belongs to our God who sits upon the throne, and to the Lamb."'
The two things about this crowd are that it is great, and that no one can number it. So where do you get off numbering it and finding it "few"?
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)


Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Acts 4:10,11

The beginning of; The Church. ------ Another thought

Acts 2:32,33 “This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses. “Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear.
 

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
Well, well. You think I do not accept the words we are given from God. I think you do not understand them.

"The New Testament Scriptures state, in most unambiguous language, that ‘the seed of Abraham’, to whom ‘all the promises of God’ belong, are those who believe the gospel of Jesus Christ (Gal. 3:7, 29; 2 Cor. 1:20).

"For God’s invariable order of procedure, in the working out of His eternal purposes, is “first – that which is natural, and afterward that which is spiritual” (1 Cor. 15:46).

"If, therefore, an Old Testament prophecy of blessing, intended for the true Israel (that ‘holy nation’ spoken of in 1 Pet. 2:9), be interpreted as applying to ‘Israel after the flesh,’ the interpretation is not ‘literal’ (i.e., according to the letter) except in the sense in which ‘the letter kills, but the spirit gives life’ (2 Cor. 3:6);

"for obviously in this case, interpreting the prophecy in relation to that typified by ‘Ishmael’ destroys it completely. And it is specially to be noted that, in the passage from which this Scripture is quoted, Paul is explaining the great differences between the Old Covenant (which was of the letter) and the New Covenant (of the Spirit);

"and, moreover, he is comparing the ministry of Moses, which had to do with things that are seen (an earthly sanctuary and its vessels of service, animal sacrifices, etc.), with the ministry of himself and others whom God had made ‘able ministers of the New Covenant; not of the letter, but of the spirit.’

"Also it should be noted that the apostle there speaks of the Old Covenant (under which promises were made to the natural Israel) as ‘that which is done away’; whereas the New Covenant is ‘that which remains,’ that is, abides eternally (2 Cor 3:11).

"From this Scripture alone it is evident (and the same truth is set forth at greater length in Gal. 4:21-31 and Hebrews chapters 8 – 10), that all future promises of glory and blessing for Israel and Zion must belong to the true Israel and the heavenly Zion.

"And, in this very passage, we are admonished to ‘look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen’ (2Cor 4:18); which admonition, however, is habitually disregarded in the interpretation of prophecies relating to these very subjects.

"Evidently then our difficulty in understanding certain prophecies is due to our lack of faith and our spiritual dullness. For, in respect to the things which are not seen, faith takes the place of sight; for faith has to do solely with things not visible to the natural eye; and the same is true for hope, for ‘hope that is seen is not hope’ (Rom. 8:24).

"Thus it is written that, ‘faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen’; and ‘through faith we understand’ (Hebrews 11:1,3).

"Hence, to understand the prophecies it is necessary, and vitally necessary,

1.) that we believe the revelations of the New Testament;

2.) that we accept as ‘literally’ true that there is now, at this present time, a realm of spiritual realities, into which our risen Lord is actually entered, and we also, in Him;

3.) that ‘the substance of things hoped for’ is there, not here;

and specially that God’s purposes concerning

4.) His Eternal City,

5.) Temple

6.) and People are being fulfilled at this very time, in that spiritual realm, though the natural eye cannot see what is going on there.

"I can testify from experience that, by the simple process of believing what is written in the New Testament concerning the actual present existence, among the things not seen,

"of the true Zion,

"of the city of the living God the heavenly Jerusalem,

"of the holy nation which is a royal priesthood,

"and of other spiritual realities,

"the main difficulty in the understanding of the Old Testament prophecies which speak of a glorified state of the things named above, vanishes away."

On the Literal Interpretation

of Prophecy – Part 2

of ‘The Hope of Israel’.

 
Top