Why do you prefer these books? Please tell us something about them.I prefer the books "Tell the truth" by Will Metzger or "Today's evangelism" by Ernest Reisinger.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why do you prefer these books? Please tell us something about them.I prefer the books "Tell the truth" by Will Metzger or "Today's evangelism" by Ernest Reisinger.
Why do you prefer these books? Please tell us something about them.
Now here's an interesting one for you. I have the 1975 Basic Training Manual for Campus Crusade for Christ, by Bill Bright (I assume; doesn't say for sure). I won't try to do more than describe the contents, but it's quite interesting.
It's all about winning folks to Christ, and has detailed instructions for using the "Four Spiritual Laws" and Bright's children's tract, "Good News Glove." (I assume there's a "Wordless Book" type of glove that goes with the tract.) An interesting thing about the children's tract is that it does delineate sin somewhat in the line of Ray Comfort's method, though it doesn't say that these sins break the Ten Commandments.
There are instructions for training someone to win souls, do a religious survey, etc. There is also a fairly good follow-up program in the book.
There is a good article specifically by Bill Bright on the fullness of the Spirit for evangelism. He says, "I am now convinced that the luke-warm, carnal Christian can be changed into a dynamic, witnessing Christian if he will surrender his will to Christ and be filled with the Spirit" (p. 158).
Now, this method is what Ray Comfort rails most at. He is right in one criticism, that Hell is not mentioned in Bright's tract. On the other hand, Comfort's books leave out teaching on the power of the fullness of the Holy Spirit and the Gospel itself.
Actually, I'm on p. 187 of TWOTM, so I think I know what it's about. Furthermore, you have misunderstood what I wrote. Please read more carefully. I did not write that the Christian life is all about winning souls to Christ, but that the book I was reviewing was. I agree that the primary duty of a Christian is to bring glory to God.How do you know that since you have not read the book The Way of the Master but only read Hells Best Kept Secret? And no it is not all about winning folks to Christ as that is a SECONDARY focus in evangelism. The primary focus is to bring glory to God. Read the book "Todays Evangelism" by Ernest Reisinger to get a clear focus on the task of evangelism. I ordered the book you mentioned which I should get today (not available electronically) and will give it a read so I suggest you give the book I have mentioned "Todays Evangelism" a read.
Actually, I'm on p. 187 of TWOTM, so I think I know what it's about. Furthermore, you have misunderstood what I wrote. Please read more carefully. I did not write that the Christian life is all about winning souls to Christ, but that the book I was reviewing was. I agree that the primary duty of a Christian is to bring glory to God.
And as for your thought that I need to "get a clear focus on the task of evangelism," I've been evangelizing for 59 years, so I hope I understand it by now.
As far as you ordering the book I mentioned, that's great. I think you will be blessed. However, I'm on the 2nd of Ray Comfort's books recommended by you, so I'm ahead in that game.
Yeah, well, if you want to go that route, I may have read more books on evangelism by Calvinists than you. I've mentioned on this thread three you apparently haven't read: Spurgeon, Kennedy, and Packer.But Comforts books are not Calvinist in nature. They are good books but I never said they were the best.
Yeah, well, if you want to go that route, I may have read more books on evangelism by Calvinists than you. I've mentioned on this thread three you apparently haven't read: Spurgeon, Kennedy, and Packer.
But that is actually irrelevant to the thread, which is simply about good books on evangelism, not those from any particular theological perspective.
He teaches that Sinners have to repent and put faith in Jesus, but need to use the Law to have that happen, correct?But Comforts books are not Calvinist in nature. They are good books but I never said they were the best.
It is very interesting though that some of the best books on this subject wer done by calvinists, so much about us not into missions/evangelism!Yeah, well, if you want to go that route, I may have read more books on evangelism by Calvinists than you. I've mentioned on this thread three you apparently haven't read: Spurgeon, Kennedy, and Packer.
But that is actually irrelevant to the thread, which is simply about good books on evangelism, not those from any particular theological perspective.
I can't listen to them myself. I have to read the book.I listened to the audiobook of Packers book. It was kinda dry. But maybe if I had read it I would have gotten more out of it I don't know. Audio books are kinda dry any ways.
Spurgeon's is one of the best ever. Other than that I have to go with John R. Rice--who was actually strongly influenced by Spurgeon.It is very interesting though that some of the best books on this subject wer done by calvinists, so much about us not into missions/evangelism!
It is very interesting though that some of the best books on this subject wer done by calvinists, so much about us not into missions/evangelism!
Spurgeon's is one of the best ever. Other than that I have to go with John R. Rice--who was actually strongly influenced by Spurgeon.
Was he a calvinist then? Think that he would be shocked at the Sword of the Lord newspaper that now wentinto really bein "Fundamenatlist"Spurgeon's is one of the best ever. Other than that I have to go with John R. Rice--who was actually strongly influenced by Spurgeon.
Yes, he was.He was your Grandfather, correct?
No, he was not a Calvinist--even wrote against the five points. But he appreciated godly men empowered by the Holy Spirit, no matter what their theology.Was he a calvinist then? Think that he would be shocked at the Sword of the Lord newspaper that now wentinto really bein "Fundamenatlist"
No, he was not a Calvinist--even wrote against the five points. But he appreciated godly men empowered by the Holy Spirit, no matter what their theology.
.
That is very cool. Would it be possible for you to get a scan of that to me? (I have to head out now--I'll come back here tomorrow.)I have a letter from John R. Rice about a (now defunct) Bible college that was hyper calvinist.
It is in one of my boxes in storage.That is very cool. Would it be possible for you to get a scan of that to me? (I have to head out now--I'll come back here tomorrow.)