Republican Senator wants O’Connor promoted; not retired:
A liberal Republican who owes his re-election victory last year to the President may be emerging as the greatest threat to the chief executive’s ability to name conservative justices to the Supreme Court. Speaking to a nationally-televised audience on July 10, Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) helped to fuel a Democrat plan aimed at retaining Sandra Day O’Connor to replace soon-to-retire William Rehnquist as the Court’s Chief Justice.
Speaking to the CBS news program ‘Face the Nation,’ Specter promoted the idea of an O’Connor promotion by saying:
Sandra Day O’Connor is anything but a strict constitutionalist. Her deviation from the Constitution is well-documented, including her support for decisions guaranteeing the legal “right” to same-sex sodomy and abortion. According to a WorldNetDaily report in October of 2003, O’Connor’s reliance on foreign law over the U.S. Constitution helped her win the “World Justice Award” from the Southern Center for International Studies.
According to the transcript of Specter’s comments found on the CBS News website, Senator Specter said Justice O’Connor was approached about the idea by Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL). He added that her response to the idea, as he was told, was “she was flattered [and] that she didn’t say no.”
Family Policy Network (FPN) President Joe Glover criticized Specter for trying to help fuel a promotion for O’Connor, saying the Senator should support the conservative nominees that the President has always promised he would appoint to the Supreme Court, saying:
Source: Family Policy Network
A liberal Republican who owes his re-election victory last year to the President may be emerging as the greatest threat to the chief executive’s ability to name conservative justices to the Supreme Court. Speaking to a nationally-televised audience on July 10, Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) helped to fuel a Democrat plan aimed at retaining Sandra Day O’Connor to replace soon-to-retire William Rehnquist as the Court’s Chief Justice.
Speaking to the CBS news program ‘Face the Nation,’ Specter promoted the idea of an O’Connor promotion by saying:
Specter’s statements are clearly out of step with the often-repeated promise by President Bush to place conservative justices like Clarence Thomas and William Rehnquist on the Supreme Court. For example, in an October 2000 television debate with Al Gore, Bush said, “I’ll put competent judges on the bench, people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and will not use the bench to write social policy. I don’t believe in liberal, activist judges. I believe in strict constructionists.”“I think it would be very tempting if the president said to Justice O’Connor, ‘You could help the country now.’ .. She has received so much adulation that a confirmation proceeding would be more like a coronation, and she might be willing to stay on for a year or so.”
Sandra Day O’Connor is anything but a strict constitutionalist. Her deviation from the Constitution is well-documented, including her support for decisions guaranteeing the legal “right” to same-sex sodomy and abortion. According to a WorldNetDaily report in October of 2003, O’Connor’s reliance on foreign law over the U.S. Constitution helped her win the “World Justice Award” from the Southern Center for International Studies.
According to the transcript of Specter’s comments found on the CBS News website, Senator Specter said Justice O’Connor was approached about the idea by Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL). He added that her response to the idea, as he was told, was “she was flattered [and] that she didn’t say no.”
Family Policy Network (FPN) President Joe Glover criticized Specter for trying to help fuel a promotion for O’Connor, saying the Senator should support the conservative nominees that the President has always promised he would appoint to the Supreme Court, saying:
Despite major ideological differences between them, President Bush endorsed Specter in 2004 over a conservative primary challenger who nearly beat him. Bush’s support for Specter rankled many conservative Republicans, and may have been the reason the President lost Pennsylvania in his own re-election bid that same year.“Arlen Specter is biting the very hand that fed him. His presumptuous statements are diametrically opposed to the President’s plan to nominate ’strict constitutionalists.’ His actions are a complete betrayal of the same President that saved Specter’s career in 2004.”
Source: Family Policy Network