I would recommend that anyone wondering about AIDs as being a man made designer infection, get hold of Dr. Stan Montieth's works..... google him, listen to his programs: You may get a different VP. He's a medical doctor, now in his eighties... but did research on the AIDS virus, wrote on the subject, and was active in trying to get the public health department to put protective protocols in place to prevent and stop the spread. He reasons that initiatially it was introduced to the homosexual community through a trial vaccine program intended to protect against the hepatitis virus which was commonly spread because of their promiscous behavior and multiple partners. Also, he discovered in his research, a surge among blacks.... when the virus hit the heterosexual community, which he thinks may be a predisposition in susceptibility. Initiatially he found much support in the medical and the public health community..... but there was a subset of homosexual activist within these areas....particularly in public health, but more important.... the homosexual community, at large, was determined not to have this labeled as it first started out 'as a gay disease' and so to be pc...... their activism prevented the restraints on disclosure and prevention which had been exercised against some previously identified sexual transmitted diseases. Still, we know, the stigma of 'gay disease' took hold during the early recognition of this disease, took place in spite of the lack of reporting and early testing.... and many who were innocents who acquired this immuno deficiency throught transplants, transfusions, needle sticks or similar accidents, or parterners with mates who were unfaithful, were also the recipients of suspicion and social avoidance ......until more became known about this disease and its spread.
Regarding the tax question..... KH isn't the only one who has questioned....... but he not only questioned but did brag about his defiance in some of the meetings which I attended at a local church. One can google Bill Benson on the internet and get the pros and cons regarding another man involved in a lengthy prosecution, who bases his claim regarding taxes on his research that the 16th ammendment was 'declared' as properly ratified, when, in actually it wasn't..... but everyone bought into what the government said.
If one thinks a church is safe...... they can check out and google the exile church at Salem and see one church which was seized by the Feds. There have been others..... but I don't remember their names or locations. I believe this one was in NJ or MD.
Once again, I stand by that when a government makes law to serve its convenience, and that law isn't based upon some foundation or veres from its foundation.... it can make criminals of whomever it will, and will if its leadership is evil...... and take what it wants from whom ever it will for whatever purpose it desires.
:smilewinkgrin: :laugh: