Alan Gross
Well-Known Member
The WORST, MOST DEMONS INSPIRED HERMENEUTIC, for SEEING The Book of Revelation, is to attempt to find WHAT GOD SAYS, by using a, "let's take the verse literally unless we have to think it should be taken symbolically."
THAT is EVIL, Anti-Christ, and OPPOSITE of WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS.
"The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:" Revelation 1:1.
THAT ATTEMPT, of "let's take the verse literally unless we have to think it should be taken symbolically" IS CARNAL & INCONSISTENT in attempted practice.
from:
9.0.18a:> NT: REVELATION 21:9; SATAN SOLD: “The Pre-Mil/ Rapture” Trap to The Candlestick’s Angles in Jesus’ Right Hand and SOME of HIS BRIDE BOUGHT IT.
The “Connotation” of a Reality, stated IN FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE
is OFTEN MORE EXPRESSIVE of THE TRUTH and FACTS of REALITY
then when a Fact is simply “Denoted”.
…
BOTH ARE LITERAL, LITERARY, LITERATURE.
…
The confusion is created when, “Literal” Interpretation
is CONFUSED with “LETTER-ISM”, or a “Letter-for-Letter”,
PHOTOGRAPHIC, Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”.
…
The result of this confusion created, BY ASSUMING
“Literal” Interpretation TO MEAN: “LETTER-ISM”,
is in an Inconsistent Hermeneutic.
…
For example, pressured by the obvious, the falsely presumed to be:
prophetic “literalist”, WHO IS ACTUALLY MISHANDLING
THE LITERATURE of THEIR NATIVE TONGUE,
BY INJECTING “LETTER-ISM”,
or a “Letter-for-Letter”, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”,
AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR BASIC STRAIGHTFORWARD
READING the INTERPRETATION of LITERATURE,
will readily concede that the sword coming from Christ’s mouth
is a symbol for the word of God (1:16);
or
that the Spirit symbolizes the exalted Christ as a Lamb
with seven horns and seven eyes in order to remind us that our Sacrifice for sin
is now the Omnipotent and Omniscient High King and High Priest of Heaven (5:6).
…
When, however, the PRESUMED “literalist” INJECTS “LETTER-ISM”
or a “Letter-for-Letter”, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”
and comes to the 144,000 of all the tribes
of the children of Israel (7:4);
or
to the two witnesses who prophesy
and (briefly) perish on the streets
of the Great City (11:8);
or
to Christ’s admonition to the saints
against taking the mark of the Beast (13:16-18);
or
to the gathering of the kings of the whole world
at the Mountain of Megiddo (16:14);
. . .
Then:
the PRESUMED “literalist” that has INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
suddenly abandons the symbolic hermeneutic,
AFTER THEY HAD conceded, for example,
that the sword coming from Christ’s mouth
is a symbol for the word of God (1:16), etc., etc.
while using the symbolic hermeneutic,
THEY SWITCH OFF FROM the symbolic hermeneutic
IN MID-STREAM
TO:
a Presumed “literal” hermeneutic,
in which they have INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
or a “Letter-for-Letter”, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
and they look at “the 144,000 of all the tribes
of the children of Israel (7:4)” and say,
LET’S COUNT ‘EM”,
rather than maintaining the symbolic hermeneutic,
at which time they may come to understand
that the 12 Apostles
represent The New Testament SAINTS
Faithful to God in Service and Worship
and
The 12 Tribes of Israel
represent The Old Testament SAINTS
Faithful to God in Service and Worship.
…
12 x 12 = 144.
…
Then,
MULTIPLY 144 TIMES The Number for The COMPLETENESS
of ALMIGHTY GOD ( 10 ) in MAGNITUDE, or “1,000”
or
144 X 1,000 & we get: 144,000.
…
That’s what “we get”.
…
Do you get it ?
…
BY ENGAGING IN THIS PROCESS of RANDOMLY SWITCHING OFF FROM
the symbolic hermeneutic IN MID-STREAM
TO:
a Presumed “literal” hermeneutic,
in which they have INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
THE “LITERALIST / LETTER-ISM-ISTS” or trying to force a “Letter-for-Letter”,
PHOTOGRAPHIC, Carbon Copy, “Interpretation”,
taken at “Face Value” ONLY,
ARE
thereby abandoning:
a Consistent Method of Interpretation
for an Inconsistent Method of Interpretation.
…
More than once I have heard literalists
that has INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
complain that a symbolic, typological hermeneutic
will leave the prophetic interpreter “at sea,”
bobbing up and down on the swells of mere subjectivity.
…
But perhaps it is really the literalist that has INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”, (Reading Literature......)
who is “at sea”, or bobbing back and forth at his own good pleasure,
RANDOMLY SWITCHING OFF FROM
the symbolic hermeneutic IN MID-STREAM
TO attempt to follow:
a Presumed “literal” hermeneutic,
in which they have INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
WHICH IS, AT BEST,
“HALTING”,
between two diametrically opposed approaches
in their "interpretation" of apocalyptic literature in general,
and
The Book of Revelation in particular,
AND RESULTS in FOOLISH GARBAGE & not WHAT GOD REVEALED.
THAT is EVIL, Anti-Christ, and OPPOSITE of WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS.
"The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:" Revelation 1:1.
THAT ATTEMPT, of "let's take the verse literally unless we have to think it should be taken symbolically" IS CARNAL & INCONSISTENT in attempted practice.
from:
9.0.18a:> NT: REVELATION 21:9; SATAN SOLD: “The Pre-Mil/ Rapture” Trap to The Candlestick’s Angles in Jesus’ Right Hand and SOME of HIS BRIDE BOUGHT IT.
The “Connotation” of a Reality, stated IN FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE
is OFTEN MORE EXPRESSIVE of THE TRUTH and FACTS of REALITY
then when a Fact is simply “Denoted”.
…
BOTH ARE LITERAL, LITERARY, LITERATURE.
…
The confusion is created when, “Literal” Interpretation
is CONFUSED with “LETTER-ISM”, or a “Letter-for-Letter”,
PHOTOGRAPHIC, Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”.
…
The result of this confusion created, BY ASSUMING
“Literal” Interpretation TO MEAN: “LETTER-ISM”,
is in an Inconsistent Hermeneutic.
…
For example, pressured by the obvious, the falsely presumed to be:
prophetic “literalist”, WHO IS ACTUALLY MISHANDLING
THE LITERATURE of THEIR NATIVE TONGUE,
BY INJECTING “LETTER-ISM”,
or a “Letter-for-Letter”, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”,
AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR BASIC STRAIGHTFORWARD
READING the INTERPRETATION of LITERATURE,
will readily concede that the sword coming from Christ’s mouth
is a symbol for the word of God (1:16);
or
that the Spirit symbolizes the exalted Christ as a Lamb
with seven horns and seven eyes in order to remind us that our Sacrifice for sin
is now the Omnipotent and Omniscient High King and High Priest of Heaven (5:6).
…
When, however, the PRESUMED “literalist” INJECTS “LETTER-ISM”
or a “Letter-for-Letter”, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”
and comes to the 144,000 of all the tribes
of the children of Israel (7:4);
or
to the two witnesses who prophesy
and (briefly) perish on the streets
of the Great City (11:8);
or
to Christ’s admonition to the saints
against taking the mark of the Beast (13:16-18);
or
to the gathering of the kings of the whole world
at the Mountain of Megiddo (16:14);
. . .
Then:
the PRESUMED “literalist” that has INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
suddenly abandons the symbolic hermeneutic,
AFTER THEY HAD conceded, for example,
that the sword coming from Christ’s mouth
is a symbol for the word of God (1:16), etc., etc.
while using the symbolic hermeneutic,
THEY SWITCH OFF FROM the symbolic hermeneutic
IN MID-STREAM
TO:
a Presumed “literal” hermeneutic,
in which they have INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
or a “Letter-for-Letter”, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
Carbon Copy, taken Only at “Face Value”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
and they look at “the 144,000 of all the tribes
of the children of Israel (7:4)” and say,
LET’S COUNT ‘EM”,
rather than maintaining the symbolic hermeneutic,
at which time they may come to understand
that the 12 Apostles
represent The New Testament SAINTS
Faithful to God in Service and Worship
and
The 12 Tribes of Israel
represent The Old Testament SAINTS
Faithful to God in Service and Worship.
…
12 x 12 = 144.
…
Then,
MULTIPLY 144 TIMES The Number for The COMPLETENESS
of ALMIGHTY GOD ( 10 ) in MAGNITUDE, or “1,000”
or
144 X 1,000 & we get: 144,000.
…
That’s what “we get”.
…
Do you get it ?
…
BY ENGAGING IN THIS PROCESS of RANDOMLY SWITCHING OFF FROM
the symbolic hermeneutic IN MID-STREAM
TO:
a Presumed “literal” hermeneutic,
in which they have INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
THE “LITERALIST / LETTER-ISM-ISTS” or trying to force a “Letter-for-Letter”,
PHOTOGRAPHIC, Carbon Copy, “Interpretation”,
taken at “Face Value” ONLY,
ARE
thereby abandoning:
a Consistent Method of Interpretation
for an Inconsistent Method of Interpretation.
…
More than once I have heard literalists
that has INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
complain that a symbolic, typological hermeneutic
will leave the prophetic interpreter “at sea,”
bobbing up and down on the swells of mere subjectivity.
…
But perhaps it is really the literalist that has INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”, (Reading Literature......)
who is “at sea”, or bobbing back and forth at his own good pleasure,
RANDOMLY SWITCHING OFF FROM
the symbolic hermeneutic IN MID-STREAM
TO attempt to follow:
a Presumed “literal” hermeneutic,
in which they have INJECTED “LETTER-ISM”,
INTO THEIR UNDERSTANDING of “READING”,
WHICH IS, AT BEST,
“HALTING”,
between two diametrically opposed approaches
in their "interpretation" of apocalyptic literature in general,
and
The Book of Revelation in particular,
AND RESULTS in FOOLISH GARBAGE & not WHAT GOD REVEALED.