Has the McCain - Palin Campaign Decided it can't Compete on the Issues?

[here now]

Anyone who claims that Senator Obama is a terrorist or has terrorist ties is not telling the truth. Period.

Prove it! Where is your proof?

 

[pocadots1990]

Forget the economy and the Iraq war for a minute. The main issue we need to concern ourselves with are moral issues. Granted I don't agree with Senator McCain on ALL of the moral issues and I DEFINITELY don't agree with Senator Obama on the moral issues.

Once the moral issues go, so does our country. Forget the smear campaign and base your decisions on the facts. We are going to give an account to Jesus Christ for how we vote.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Seems to me we should be fighting the ones who decided to give our money to wall st. They are wearing both colors, and both the pres candidates were all for it, while we were against it.

 

[KenH]

here now,

If you are claiming that Senator Obama, then you prove it or shut up about it!!!!

If you are claiming that Senator Obama has ties to people committing terrorism, then you prove it or shut up about it!!!!

If you are making the accusation, then you have to prove it or else shut up about it!!!!

If you can't prove it(and you can't) and keep making the claim then you will look very, very, very foolish.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

I have proved it. several have. His buddy Ayers.

 

[KenH]

We only have two choices who can be the next president. And I don't want John McCain in the White House. Period.

 

[KenH]

His buddy Ayers.

That's no proof. That's just plum silly. You're preaching to the right-wingers who won't vote for Senator Obama.

 

[here now]

Then so will we Obama supporters. So there. We'll match you negative post for negative post as far as possible considering that there are more right-wingers on this board than us sensible folks.

The McCain supporters would win the neg post for neg post simply because you Obama supporters don't have enough negative material on McCain. It has nothing to do with how many right-wingers are on here.

Not that I'm interested in this sort of thing.

 

[pocadots1990]

Seems to me we should be fighting the ones who decided to give our money to wall st. They are wearing both colors, and both the pres candidates were all for it, while we were against it.

I agree with you that the government should NOT have bailed out Wall Street. But that is NOT the main issue right now.

To Ken and everyone else, please pray before you vote to see how God would want you to vote.

 

[KenH]

The McCain supporters would win the neg post for neg post simply because you Obama supporters don't have enough negative material on McCain.

Do we have enough material? You betcha.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

That's no proof. That's just plum silly. You're preaching to the right-wingers who won't vote for Senator Obama.

What is silly is the denial. You should just admit this is a good issue, and encourage Obama to let us know why he was so close to this guy.

We aren't going away.

 

[KenH]

To Ken and everyone else, please pray before you vote to see how God would want you to vote.

I have been doing so and I will continue to do so. :thumbs:

Which is also why I really won't go as negative as the McCain supporters in this forum, even though I am sorely tempted to do so. My conscience won't allow me to stay that long in the gutter with them.

 

[KenH]

encourage Obama to let us know why he was so close to this guy.

He wasn't close to this guy.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Yes, he was, Ken. Even the NYTimes gets it.....

.....
That attitude is widely shared in Chicago, but it is not universal. Steve Chapman, a columnist for The Chicago Tribune, defended Mr. Obama’s relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., his longtime pastor, whose black liberation theology and “God d*&# America” sermon became notorious last spring. But he denounced Mr. Obama for associating with Mr. Ayers, whom he said the University of Illinois should never have hired.
“I don’t think there’s a statute of limitations on terrorist bombings,” Mr. Chapman said in an interview, speaking not of the law but of political and moral implications.
“If you’re in public life, you ought to say, ‘I don’t want to be associated with this guy,’ ” Mr. Chapman said. “If John McCain had a long association with a guy who’d bombed abortion clinics, I don’t think people would say, ‘That’s ancient history.’ ”


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

 

[KenH]

Because Steve Chapman says something doesn't make it so.

 

[here now]

here now,

If you are claiming that Senator Obama, then you prove it or shut up about it!!!!

If you are claiming that Senator Obama has ties to people committing terrorism, then you prove it or shut up about it!!!!

If you are making the accusation, then you have to prove it or else shut up about it!!!!

If you can't prove it(and you can't) and keep making the claim then you will look very, very, very foolish.

Here's your proof.
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=53708

I don't appreciate your mean spiritedness!

 

[poncho]

Seems to me we should be fighting the ones who decided to give our money to wall st. They are wearing both colors, and both the pres candidates were all for it, while we were against it.

I guess some folks just can't get enough of being lied too manipulated ripped off and sold out Bro.

 

[here now]

Do we have enough material? You betcha.

Hit us with your best shot.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Because Steve Chapman says something doesn't make it so.

Well a lot of others have said it too, like me, and I don't even know that dude.

But your denial does little to make the claim false.

 

[here now]

Hit us with your best shot.

Ken's best shot is, he has no best shot. This was posted right after he's challenged to go head to head on candidates.

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=53744