• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

has the SBC Decided if they Are officially Cal/Arm yet in beliefs?

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Know there were "papers" going around on both side regarding this, was there ever an official decision made by the SBC at leadership levels?
 

12strings

Active Member
Know there were "papers" going around on both side regarding this, was there ever an official decision made by the SBC at leadership levels?

No. Not even close. There were no papers that would do anything official. BF&M still allows for a variety of views.

(I am a member of a local, autonomous, Baptist Church that gives some money to the Cooperative Program, The IMB, and Namb.)
 

Greektim

Well-Known Member
Know there were "papers" going around on both side regarding this, was there ever an official decision made by the SBC at leadership levels?
"leaders" so called would have no power to make such a decision in the SBC. Your question misunderstands the "power structure" of the SBC entirely.

The influence of these doctrines throughout the SBC will come down from the seminaries teaching of these doctrines. It seems at a stalemate to this point. But if more calvies are put in faculty positions throughout, then the more influence they have on the future pastors and so on and so forth.
 

12strings

Active Member
"leaders" so called would have no power to make such a decision in the SBC. Your question misunderstands the "power structure" of the SBC entirely.

The influence of these doctrines throughout the SBC will come down from the seminaries teaching of these doctrines. It seems at a stalemate to this point. But if more calvies are put in faculty positions throughout, then the more influence they have on the future pastors and so on and so forth.

Stalemate between Seminaries, I might add. SBTS being the most calvinistic, SWBTS being the most anti-calvinistic, with New Orleans probalby similar. SouthEastern you might call "Sympathetic" to calvinists...The others, I don't know.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"leaders" so called would have no power to make such a decision in the SBC. Your question misunderstands the "power structure" of the SBC entirely.

The influence of these doctrines throughout the SBC will come down from the seminaries teaching of these doctrines. It seems at a stalemate to this point. But if more calvies are put in faculty positions throughout, then the more influence they have on the future pastors and so on and so forth.

Isn't their current president a staunch calvinist?

And think sthta the Seminaries at least should get back to teaching such?
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Stalemate between Seminaries, I might add. SBTS being the most calvinistic, SWBTS being the most anti-calvinistic, with New Orleans probalby similar. SouthEastern you might call "Sympathetic" to calvinists...The others, I don't know.

Hmmm, does that man that the SBTS was predestined to be wrong? :laugh:
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Stalemate between Seminaries, I might add. SBTS being the most calvinistic, SWBTS being the most anti-calvinistic, with New Orleans probalby similar. SouthEastern you might call "Sympathetic" to calvinists...The others, I don't know.

Ahhhhh....:BangHead:....I still cant get a darn one of you to plant a church in North West NJ. WTHeck
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"leaders" so called would have no power to make such a decision in the SBC. Your question misunderstands the "power structure" of the SBC entirely.

This is exactly what I was going to say.

Yeshua1/DaChaser1/JesusFan...please stop asking these kinds of questions.
 

12strings

Active Member
Isn't their current president a staunch calvinist?

And think sthta the Seminaries at least should get back to teaching such?

1. President of what, the SBC? Fred Luter? Not sure...I don't think he is.

2. No one can make the seminaries do that with the power structure as it exists right now...
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
1. President of what, the SBC? Fred Luter? Not sure...I don't think he is.

2. No one can make the seminaries do that with the power structure as it exists right now...

My mistake! I was referring to Dr Mohler in the SBC, as one of the chief spokesman and proponent for getting calvinism back among the SBC church...
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
"leaders" so called would have no power to make such a decision in the SBC. Your question misunderstands the "power structure" of the SBC entirely.

The influence of these doctrines throughout the SBC will come down from the seminaries teaching of these doctrines. It seems at a stalemate to this point. But if more calvies are put in faculty positions throughout, then the more influence they have on the future pastors and so on and so forth.

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

Gregory Perry Sr.

Active Member
As to the Calvinist "Thingie"

IF the SBC were EVER to adopt 5-point Calvinism as their official doctrinal stance I know of at least (2) SBC Pastors (mine and his father-in-law) and at least (3) laymen (and women),myself,my wife and my best friend who would never give another dime to the Cooperative Program. As it is now I usually designate our offerings and use cash to make them for reasons that are between us and the Lord. I'm not "big" on the Cooperative program to begin with because there is no real control over who and how the money is utilized. You give in and they (whoever "they" are) dole it out. It's NOT "local" enough for me...but that is a topic for another thread. That ANY of that money would even go to an SBC school that supports Calvinism would be a no-no to me. Let them pay for their own fun and games.:tear: I just don't wish to "advance" their cause. I don't wish to sound mean...I know there are some dear and sincere brethren that believe that way. I'm just not one of them.

Bro.Greg:saint:
 

Herald

New Member
I am uncomfortable around any Baptist association that mimics a denomation. That includes the SBC and ARBCA.
 
Top