easternstar
Member
Jesus said His followers would do greater things than He did. Why don't we see healings and miracles inside and outside our churches like the first century Christians did? Shouldn't we be seeing this occur?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I think the lack of healings and miracles today is due, not to them passing away when the original apostles died, but due to the lack of faith in current church leadership. It makes no sense to say the “sign gifts” were given just to establish the first century church. There is absolutely no biblical justification for such an absurd idea either.Jesus said His followers would do greater things than He did. Why don't we see healings and miracles inside and outside our churches like the first century Christians did? Shouldn't we be seeing this occur?
Jesus was not speaking qualitatively - not more miraculously. He was speaking quantitatively - more leading people to Christ.Jesus said His followers would do greater things than He did. Why don't we see healings and miracles inside and outside our churches like the first century Christians did? Shouldn't we be seeing this occur?
Leading people to Christ is just a single type of work. But Jesus said the works (plural) that I do shall they do also. Jesus drew individuals to His Father, taught, healed, raised the dead, calmed the storm, fed thousands, cast out demons, etc.Jesus was not speaking qualitatively - not more miraculously. He was speaking quantitatively - more leading people to Christ.
For example, on the day of Pentecost, yes, they spoke different languages to Jews from around the known world so they would understand in their own language. But what was the end goal?
3,000 people were saved. That's the greater work.
I think the lack of healings and miracles today is due, not to them passing away when the original apostles died, but due to the lack of faith in current church leadership. It makes no sense to say the “sign gifts” were given just to establish the first century church. There is absolutely no biblical justification for such an absurd idea either.
And if “sign gifts” are for establishing the church, then we certainly need them desperately today, since church attendance and membership is declining rapidly, especially as many denominations have gone woke and broke.
Church leadership has transferred faith in Jesus the healer to modern medicine and big Pharma.
Divine Healing: Andrew Murray: 9780883681121: Amazon.com: Books
Divine Healing [Andrew Murray] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Divine Healingwww.amazon.com
I think you have a point about the leadership. But I don't think the lack of healings and miracles can be laid entirely on the leadership.I think the lack of healings and miracles today is due, not to them passing away when the original apostles died, but due to the lack of faith in current church leadership. It makes no sense to say the “sign gifts” were given just to establish the first century church. There is absolutely no biblical justification for such an absurd idea either.
And if “sign gifts” are for establishing the church, then we certainly need them desperately today, since church attendance and membership is declining rapidly, especially as many denominations have gone woke and broke.
Church leadership has transferred faith in Jesus the healer to modern medicine and big Pharma.
Divine Healing: Andrew Murray: 9780883681121: Amazon.com: Books
Divine Healing [Andrew Murray] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Divine Healingwww.amazon.com
True. But that still doesn't answer the question of why there is such a lack of healing and miracles in today's church and among Christians. Of course Charismatiics would say there are such healings and miracles in their circles. I've been in those circles, and I didn't see it there either.Jesus was not speaking qualitatively - not more miraculously. He was speaking quantitatively - more leading people to Christ.
For example, on the day of Pentecost, yes, they spoke different languages to Jews from around the known world so they would understand in their own language. But what was the end goal?
3,000 people were saved. That's the greater work.
Jesus knew that some will say “Lord, lord, did we not cast out spirits and do many mighty wonders in your name?” but not be truly following and obeying Him.Are the two of you saying that Jesus was saying that the early church and the modern church would be more sensational than he? That he was speaking qualitatively? That we would draw more to Christ with our being supernatural sideshow?
And are the two of you saying that you don't see this and it's a problem? What would you have to see for the church to be more of a sensation than Jesus Christ?
I can't go for that. Yes, there are miracles today. Especially in Islamic countries where they have never even HEARD of Jesus. Yes, people are healed. Yes, families are restored.
In America, I don't need to see a miracle to follow Christ. I have the Bible and solid preaching. I don't want to be "bigger" than Jesus. I don't want to sit under a pastor who is "bigger" than Jesus. Do the two of you believe that those who are "bigger" than Jesus are the only ones truly following Christ?
Jesus wasn't talking about being a sensation. He was talking about scope and magnitude. In three years, he, in his human form, covered a certain amount of locations and confronted a certain amount of people. The church in that last 2000 years has covered more scope, more locations, seen more miracles and salvations.
I have not "denied any supernatural promise." I am not "resistant" to it.Jesus knew that some will say “Lord, lord, did we not cast out spirits and do many mighty wonders in your name?” but not be truly following and obeying Him.
But Jesus did say we could do the same works He did and greater. Greater in number of people taught and saved? Certainly. Greater in number of miracles? Why not? Neither type of greater makes anyone “bigger” or better than our Lord. But to deny the supernatural operations promised to us makes us less than what we should be.
Healing and other gift operations should not be sensational, or requirements for following Christ, but should be ways of fulfilling the promises of Christ in blessing and meeting human needs.
Certain charismatic preachers may fake healings and create a sensationalized side show, but that does not negate John 14:12. There are heretical sermon preachers too, but that doesn’t mean sermonizing should be abandoned.
You would be very happy if, when you got cancer for example, you could go to your pastor, a church member, or the elders of the church who would lay hands on you, anoint you with oil, and believingly minister healing to you, rather than say, “I will pray for you, but not the prayer of faith as stated in James, because I don’t know if it is God’s will to heal you. Sign gifts passed away with the original apostles.”
Jesus never told a sick person, “I would like to heal you, but God is using this illness to teach you something. Sorry.”
Delivering suffering individuals is mercy, not side show. Jesus probably had to be careful about multitudes flocking to Him just to see miracles, yet so many times the gospels say that they brought sick and possessed people to Jesus, and He healed them all.
Why are we so resistant to this clear promise to be enabled to do the full range of His works? — John 14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
I can't say it better than Ascetic X did in his reply to you.Are the two of you saying that Jesus was saying that the early church and the modern church would be more sensational than he? That he was speaking qualitatively? That we would draw more to Christ with our being supernatural sideshow?
And are the two of you saying that you don't see this and it's a problem? What would you have to see for the church to be more of a sensation than Jesus Christ?
I can't go for that. Yes, there are miracles today. Especially in Islamic countries where they have never even HEARD of Jesus. Yes, people are healed. Yes, families are restored.
In America, I don't need to see a miracle to follow Christ. I have the Bible and solid preaching. I don't want to be "bigger" than Jesus. I don't want to sit under a pastor who is "bigger" than Jesus. Do the two of you believe that those who are "bigger" than Jesus are the only ones truly following Christ?
Jesus wasn't talking about being a sensation. He was talking about scope and magnitude. In three years, he, in his human form, covered a certain amount of locations and confronted a certain amount of people. The church in that last 2000 years has covered more scope, more locations, seen more miracles and salvations.
The "greater works" is primarily that the Kingdom was going to bring salvation worldwide, and no longer be limited to Israel.Jesus said His followers would do greater things than He did. Why don't we see healings and miracles inside and outside our churches like the first century Christians did? Shouldn't we be seeing this occur?