• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Holder Announces Federal Probe of Ferguson Police Department

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Yes. It is.

Okay. Then it is equally clear from what you said that you want the case decided purely on race. So long as we're using the same criteria to determine what is so clear, I can't refute your supposition about me anymore than you can refute mine about you.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Google is your friend. If you want it, look it up.

True. Google is my friend.

That's why I can say conclusively that there is absolutely no evidence the grand jury is racially biased.

It's put up or shut up time.

If you have evidence to the contrary, present it.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Okay. Then it is equally clear from what you said that you want the case decided purely on race.

No. It's not.

Justice is all I'm looking for, but we can't get it from Eric Holder. He is racially biased.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
holder-jail.jpg
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Face it C, the crickets are going to get larangetis before you get a reasonable answer.:sleep:

Of course. Zaac's racial bigotry is unsupportable here. He has no evidence. We all know it.

If he was smart, he would leave this thread, before he embarrasses himself further.

But it's not likely to happen.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
True. Google is my friend.

That's why I can say conclusively that there is absolutely no evidence the grand jury is racially biased.

You can't say anything conclusively other than you are just as racially biased as you say Holder is.

It's put up or shut up time.

Yes. Put up and prove how there's a difference between you and Holder?

If you have evidence to the contrary, present it.

If you have evidence to the contrary that you're any less racial than Holder, present it.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
No. It's not.

Justice is all I'm looking for, but we can't get it from Eric Holder. He is racially biased.

Prove it. By the many statements you've made, folks can conclude that you are equally racially biased so why should anyone trust what you say?

The people of Ferguson think McCulloch is racially biased. You don't seem to have a problem with him.

Justice for some is what you're looking for.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Of course. Zaac's racial bigotry is unsupportable here. He has no evidence. We all know it.

If he was smart, he would leave this thread, before he embarrasses himself further.

But it's not likely to happen.

Who is this we? You and the other equally racially biased people? :laugh:

You have lost your mind if you think I'm embarrassed by confronting your foolishness. You're cracking my side. :laugh:
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Who is this we? You and the other equally racially biased people? :laugh:

You have lost your mind if you think I'm embarrassed by confronting your foolishness. You're cracking my side. :laugh:

Still waiting on your evidence that the grand jury is racially biased.

Your racial bigotry seems to know no shame. :tear:

And you judge other's Christian behavior? :rolleyes:

Now, you've made your claim. You've tried every sophomoric trick you can come up with to make it stand up. It hasn't worked.

Bring forth the evidence.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Still waiting on your evidence that the grand jury is racially biased.

Still waiting on you to train your fingers like a dragon and find it yourself.

Your racial bigotry seems to know no shame. :tear:

Except when compared to your own.

And you judge other's Christian behavior? :rolleyes:

Yep.

Now, you've made your claim. You've tried every sophomoric trick you can come up with to make it stand up. It hasn't worked.

Hey if you can prove that you and the grand jury aren't as racially biased as you claim Holder to be, then get to it. Otherwise you're just bloviating.

Bring forth the evidence.

Sure , as soon as you bring forth the evidence refuting the racial bias of yourself and the grand jury.

Come on. Put your cards on the table.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sure , as soon as you bring forth the evidence refuting the racial bias of yourself and the grand jury.

Come on. Put your cards on the table.

I have seen thousands of posts by hundreds of posters on this site. You are without a doubt the most dishonest to ever hit the pages of BB. You are absolutely shameless.

And you claim to be a Christian. :rolleyes:
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
I have seen thousands of posts by hundreds of posters on this site. You are without a doubt the most dishonest to ever hit the pages of BB. You are absolutely shameless.

And you claim to be a Christian. :rolleyes:

Guess that means you don't have any evidence to disprove that you and the grand jury are as racially biased as you say Holder is.

But you seem to do a lot of grandstanding and thinking that just because you type it, everybody has to go along with it and accept it as the truth.

Holder is a black man with black experiences in a country that has marginalized and discriminated against black men.

He doesn't have to ignore patterns of behavior against black people just because those in the majority don't want to be reminded that he's black.

Get over yourself.

Somewhere along the way, the lot of you have confused your conservative politics with following Christ when your "conservative politics" makes you look like anything but a follower of Christ.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zaac

Well-Known Member
You were right. The crickets have gone silent. No voices left.

Yep. Them same crickets stopped chirping when it was time for you to present evidence to disprove that you and the grand jury are as racially biased as you say Holder is.
 

robt.k.fall

Member
It looks like y'all are talking past each other.
  1. Grand Juries are drawn from a given county as a whole, not just from a particular town or city (unless your talking about the City and County of San Francisco). What is the racial make up of Ferguson's county and its voting roll?
  2. Trying to prove the grand jury in this case is not racist at this point of time is trying to prove a negative. We haven't seen its findings and the evidence for them.
  3. Considering the history of the area, assuming the grand jury will make its finding based on race is an easy assumption. Though in 2014, it is perhaps too easy of one.
As a Californian, I have no dog in this fight.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It looks like y'all are talking past each other.
  1. Grand Juries are drawn from a given county as a whole, not just from a particular town or city (unless your talking about the City and County of San Francisco). What is the racial make up of Ferguson's county and its voting roll?
  2. Trying to prove the grand jury in this case is not racist at this point of time is trying to prove a negative. We haven't seen its findings and the evidence for them.
  3. Considering the history of the area, assuming the grand jury will make its finding based on race is an easy assumption. Though in 2014, it is perhaps too easy of one.
As a Californian, I have no dog in this fight.

We're not talking past each other.

Never providing proof of his own allegations and, at the same time, trying to force others to prove a negative is his stock in trade.

It's intellectually dishonest. Always has been.

But thanks for your input. It didn't take you long to spot the problem.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Another Attempt to be Dr. Phil?

Who is this we? You and the other equally racially biased people? :laugh:

You have lost your mind if you think I'm embarrassed by confronting your foolishness. You're cracking my side. :laugh:

Give us a break Dr. Zaac! If you aren't telling me, I need professional help, here you are diagnosing another brother .... here is a little something to remind you to stick with comments and stop with the free, on line psychological examinations. This is a debate forum, not a shrink's office?

 
Top