No doubt, there. But I gotta say that Trayvon Martin was most likely up to no good.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The title of this thread is offensive.
It reminded me of what Pilate told the chief priests and their officials regarding Jesus: "I find no guilt in him." (ESV,NASB)
Only Jesus can be truly regarded as having no guilt.
Other people can stand trial and be considered not guilty. But to call your thread We Find No Guilt In You is in bad taste.
No doubt, there. But I gotta say that Trayvon Martin was most likely up to no good.
That's right ... after a few years of close scrutiny, Holder and his crew found that Zimmerman did not violate any of Trayvon Martin's rights.
Does this wipe the slate clean, for Zimmerman, or will those who think Martin was wrongly killed, continue to protest?
I'm willing to bet Zimmerman ran his mouth and got into a fight he wasn't able to win.
That would be a fool's bet based on wishful thinking.
As you said yourself, no one will ever know what really happened that night. But you're willing to bet you're an exception to what you said?
The evidence said that Martin was a young punk with anger issues. He tried to beat up the wrong guy. Happens to wannabe tough street punks all the time.
By that logic Zimmerman apparently likes to hit women and threaten to kill motorists. Clearly the "good guy" won here. Color me shocked that Trayvon is public enemy number one and Zimmerman is your hero even though Zimmerman's rap sheet at this point puts Trayvon's to shame. Very telling.
To the contrary, as far as I can see there were no "winners".
The "hero" part you're just pulling out of thin air. A bad habit you need to break.
Funny how you call one a thug though.
Funny how you call one a thug though.
Pulled another one out of thin air.
You really need to work on breaking that habit.
No, it's just funny how you use the insulting and condemning language to describe the kid while totally avoiding the same language to the guy with anger management issues who apparently likes to hit women. That is there for all of us to see. You describe Martin as the wannabe thug with anger management issues while ironically that description more aptly describes Zimmerman who has done nothing but find himself entangled with the law since this incident. Wannabe cop.
I scene much anger in you.
No, it's just funny how you use the insulting and condemning language to describe the kid while totally avoiding the same language to the guy with anger management issues who apparently likes to hit women. That is there for all of us to see. You describe Martin as the wannabe thug with anger management issues while ironically that description more aptly describes Zimmerman who has done nothing but find himself entangled with the law since this incident. Zimmerman was a wannabe cop.
Like I keep saying, we had two bad dudes meet up that night.
You describe Martin as the wannabe thug with anger management issues ...
That would be a fool's bet based on wishful thinking.
As you said yourself, no one will ever know what really happened that night. But you're willing to bet you're an exception to what you said?
The evidence said that Martin was a young punk with anger issues. He tried to beat up the wrong guy. Happens to wannabe tough street punks all the time.