• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Homeschooling. A threat ?

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
Kathleen Moore of the Tribune News service wrote an article about the increase of home schooling since the start of the Chinese Virus. She States that
"...IF ENROLLMENT GOES DOWN, AS WELL AS FEARS THAT UNDER PREPARED CHILDREN WILL RETURN TO SCHOOL YEARS LATER AND NEED EXPENSIVE EXTRA HELP..."

Of course - if kids are not enrolled in school - the school looses that all important school aid.
The average is in the neighborhood of $15,000 per child (about $85 per day) - and if a child is absent, the school looses that amount for the day


Open for discussion
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Capitalism. If the schools are not providing what the parents want then the parents will find another way...or the schools could change.

Problem is they'll just raise taxes to support a dysfunctional school system
 

Bible Thumpin n Gun Totin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Children that are homeschooled will be underprepared to serve as a secular cog in the unbounded Capitalist machine and will instead be raised to honor God and Family and may even start small family businesses.

Certainly that's threatening to the Globalists in journalism, and government. Nothing more dangerous than educated Christians running successful businesses that don't adhere to Globalism and actually put resources into their community rather than extract them while glorifying God.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Capitalism. If the schools are not providing what the parents want then the parents will find another way...or the schools could change.

Problem is they'll just raise taxes to support a dysfunctional school system
The real problem is that public education was not intended by the founders.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
The real problem is that public education was not intended by the founders.
True. But looking at some of the parents in the world today.....somebody's got to educate the kiddos and it ain't gonna be them (at least in a positive sense).

Also, our founding fathers did not expect the majority of Americans to need an education.

My gripe is that education should be a State issue, NOT a federal issue.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
True. But looking at some of the parents in the world today.....somebody's got to educate the kiddos and it ain't gonna be them (at least in a positive sense).

Also, our founding fathers did not expect the majority of Americans to need an education.

My gripe is that education should be a State issue, NOT a federal issue.
If anything, it should be a local issue.
The majority don't need a liberal arts education. Basic reading, writing, and arithmetic. After that, vocational training. 99% of that should be on the job.
 

Marooncat79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
They are not education the children anyways

they are indoctrinating them

my daughters were home schooled and better educated and socialized than children in public schools hands down

socialization included
Swim lessons
Art lessons
Martial arts
Church
Voice lessons
Choir
And most importantly within the family structure
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
If anything, it should be a local issue.
The majority don't need a liberal arts education. Basic reading, writing, and arithmetic. After that, vocational training. 99% of that should be on the job.
I disagree. Topics like history, science and literature are important.

I argue that one of our greatest losses is the development of critical thinking skills. And this is not a result of liberal arts but rather the loss of liberal arts.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I disagree. Topics like history, science and literature are important.

I argue that one of our greatest losses is the development of critical thinking skills. And this is not a result of liberal arts but rather the loss of liberal arts.
I wouldn't expect you to agree.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I wouldn't expect you to agree.
I know. I just view history as a type of anchor for society.

Schools have already abandoned, to a large extent, history and literature. Everything leans to the present.

And literature is pretty much considered politically incorrect so it's replaced with Oprah's top ten books (and Harry Potter).

Let me ask you, why oppose tearing down historical monuments if you oppose teaching history? Seems like ignorance of history makes monument pretty much meaningless anyway.

It sounds like you want the majority to be ignorant when it comes to history, science, literature, social issues, etc. and just contribute to the workforce. This begs the question...why?

What are you afraid would happen if we again taught history, literature, and science as it was once taught in our nation?


Ironically, homeschooling is pretty good at teaching these topics.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I know. I just view history as a type of anchor for society.

Schools have already abandoned, to a large extent, history and literature. Everything leans to the present.

And literature is pretty much considered politically incorrect so it's replaced with Oprah's top ten books (and Harry Potter).

Let me ask you, why oppose tearing down historical monuments if you oppose teaching history? Seems like ignorance of history makes monument pretty much meaningless anyway.

It sounds like you want the majority to be ignorant when it comes to history, science, literature, social issues, etc. and just contribute to the workforce. This begs the question...why?

What are you afraid would happen if we again taught history, literature, and science as it was once taught in our nation?


Ironically, homeschooling is pretty good at teaching these topics.
I don't have a problem with accurate history being taught. I have a problem with revisionist indoctrination being taught.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
True. But looking at some of the parents in the world today.....somebody's got to educate the kiddos and it ain't gonna be them (at least in a positive sense).

Also, our founding fathers did not expect the majority of Americans to need an education.

My gripe is that education should be a State issue, NOT a federal issue.

It is the states job, it's just that the states are greedy. Wonder how much of that federal money never see's the inside of a school?


When you take that dollar you belong to them.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I don't have a problem with accurate history being taught. I have a problem with revisionist indoctrination being taught.
I agree.

Liberal arts include history, science, literature, mathematics, etc. It is general knowledge as opposed to professional and technical subjects.

That is what I mean when I say the problem is liberal arts have been eroded.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I agree.

Liberal arts include history, science, literature, mathematics, etc. It is general knowledge as opposed to professional and technical subjects.

That is what I mean when I say the problem is liberal arts have been eroded.
I understand what you are saying. My degree is technically a liberal arts degree. I don't think the bottom 70% of the class benefit from liberal arts. They are better served with learning a skill that will earn them a living.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Someone I knew from Colorado said something about the 4 R's. Reading, Righting, Rithmatic and Respect.

I expect some kids are in home schools due to mandates, masks, vaccines, CRT, and nonsense about pronouns.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I understand what you are saying. My degree is technically a liberal arts degree. I don't think the bottom 70% of the class benefit from liberal arts. They are better served with learning a skill that will earn them a living.
I think it can be both, just an emphasis on different areas.

I don't mean get a liberal arts degree, but we need to equip students with critical thinking skills.

When I worked HVAC we had an issue with younger techs. They were skilled, but lacked critical thinking skills (they could not "think outside the box").

I'm saying get better at these subjects in primary schools. Let high school equip the kids for living (give them these basic skills) and technical school - college - apprenticeships equip them for making a living.
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm finding this exchange between Reynolds and Jon to be interesting. In a sense, I agree with both of you. The problem I have with Jon's idea is that frankly, teaching, say, history (for example) at almost anything less than a bachelor's or graduate level is almost pointless aside from the very basics we can supply in elementary school. I am daily annoyed by the very superficial sophomoric and reductionist post-modern know-it-all views of the modern revisionist who; while not really understanding history (or how to study it properly) thinks they understand how Western culture is the bane of the Universe etc etc etc...(such as they are receiving in schools). Better they had taught them the basic dates and times of major world events in elementary schools and left it at that at that point.

Then again....to Jon's point, especially with the critical thinking skills:
Basic logic, deductive and inductive argumentation, formal and informal logic etc... Our society is sorely in need of such skills. Blue-collar working men need those skills. He references HVAC. I am 10 years an electrician and trouble-shooting for instance is a basic skill required to perform the job. I am willing to bet without him saying as much, it was trouble-shooting problems that the grief would set in and the younger techs be incapable of performing the trade. They were missing a basic skill-set.

Perhaps, we need to teach those basic logic skills etc. at the primary and high school levels because they absolutely transfer into the real world. While Reynolds is quite correct that basically 70 (I dare say closer to 80) percent of the bottom of the class does not benefit much from significant Liberal Arts education, there are some skills (like logic etc.) that are only found in those disciplines and unfortunately not meaningfully introduced until graduate education in most majors (if at all).

A mathematician, scientist, engineer would learn them from osmosis... A post-graduate historian as well. A post-grad sociologist would...
A simple 4-year college education in a non-discipline we've invented in the last 25 years like most of our kids are getting these days?....not at all.
Now, our kids aren't just stupid...they're arrogant and stupid.
 
Top