Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
“The pitifully ignorant and empty headed imbeciles who have no knowledge or intelligence with which to refute the evidence presented by the educated and wise and therefore resort to poking fun at the men themselves more than amply demonstrate their own depraved state of mind.” Julius R. Townsend
The words you quote could be used against you, equating those who disagree with you as imbeciles who deserve to be in St. Mary's asylum in Jerusalem.
No... I doubt either of them would have believed Noah when he said that God had told him a flood was coming. None of the educated men of his day did you know... and they "must" have been right, huh? </font>[/QUOTE]I have already incontrovertibly proven that there is no Biblical evidence that Noah was a real person. He may or may not have been; the Bible simply does not provide us with that information any more than it endorses the Mormon practice of baptizing the dead. But, just like the Mormons and J.W.’s, there are plenty of fundamentalists who cherish their pre-conceived ideas of what the Bible teaches rather than what the Bible really teaches. I don’t fellowship with the Mormons and J.W.’s, and I am no longer going to fellowship in this thread.
No... I doubt either of them would have believed Noah when he said that God had told him a flood was coming. None of the educated men of his day did you know... and they "must" have been right, huh? </font>[/QUOTE]I have already incontrovertibly proven that there is no Biblical evidence that Noah was a real person. He may or may not have been; the Bible simply does not provide us with that information any more than it endorses the Mormon practice of baptizing the dead. But, just like the Mormons and J.W.’s, there are plenty of fundamentalists who cherish their pre-conceived ideas of what the Bible teaches rather than what the Bible really teaches. I don’t fellowship with the Mormons and J.W.’s, and I am no longer going to fellowship in this thread.
No... I doubt either of them would have believed Noah when he said that God had told him a flood was coming. None of the educated men of his day did you know... and they "must" have been right, huh? </font>[/QUOTE]I have already incontrovertibly proven that there is no Biblical evidence that Noah was a real person.</font>[/QUOTE] If you think you have provided anything remotely approaching evidence for Noah's "non-existence" then you are dangerously delusional.
Yes it does. On the one hand, you have someone referenced by name as a person and included in geneologies... to whom God made promises referenced by Isaiah as proof of God's trustworthiness... the events of whose life are referenced in both testaments.... In short, a person we have every biblical reason to believe was real as numerous other biblical characters.
That is certainly a case of the cast iron pot calling the stainless steel pan black.
FTR, I am not fellowshipping with you. I am repudiating your ungodly, doubt filled, man exalting assertions.I don’t fellowship with the Mormons and J.W.’s, and I am no longer going to fellowship in this thread.
That's really all there is to the whole argument right there - the heart and soul of Theological Liberalism - disbelief in, and sitting in judgment of, what God said.
“The pitifully ignorant and empty headed imbeciles who have no knowledge or intelligence with which to refute the evidence presented by the educated and wise and therefore resort to poking fun at the men themselves more than amply demonstrate their own depraved state of mind.” Julius R. Townsend
No... I doubt either of them would have believed Noah when he said that God had told him a flood was coming. None of the educated men of his day did you know... and they "must" have been right, huh? </font>[/QUOTE]I have already incontrovertibly proven that there is no Biblical evidence that Noah was a real person. He may or may not have been; the Bible simply does not provide us with that information any more than it endorses the Mormon practice of baptizing the dead. But, just like the Mormons and J.W.’s, there are plenty of fundamentalists who cherish their pre-conceived ideas of what the Bible teaches rather than what the Bible really teaches. I don’t fellowship with the Mormons and J.W.’s, and I am no longer going to fellowship in this thread.
What would you like to hear?
What would you like to hear?
SuperBaptist, once again you seem to miss the point. This is not about hating anyone. Nor is it about denying free speech. This is about whether to allow homosexuals a forum to advocate their position.
What? You consider the following ad hominem?
That's really all there is to the whole argument right there - the heart and soul of Theological Liberalism - disbelief in, and sitting in judgment of, what God said.
When are Christian fundamentalists going to get their act together and stop posting ad hominem statements and start dealing with reality by posting something that that shows the actual weaknesses in their opponent’s arguments? No liberal theology has yet been posted in this thread, and most certainly not by me for I am sticking VERY CLOSELY to mainstream conservative theology regarding the authorship of Genesis and the literary milieu to which it belongs. These views did not originate with me, but are result of very many years of study by many of the finest conservative scholars.