• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

House Votes to Reaffirm ‘In God We Trust’

freeatlast

New Member
I still contend that 'God's nation' would not have the blood of 50 million children on her hands. It is an evil, wicked, cursed land that allows this kind of slaughter.

.

Well we agree that Israel is God's stated people and nation. I also agree we as a nation have a great deal of blood on our hands, but are our sins greater then that of His chosen people? I don't think so.

So while I agree that this nation cannot make any biblical claim to being one nation under God I do think that all the evidence points to the understanding that this nation would not be what it is if not for God even though we have many faults.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Yes - read the Constitution. A disclaimer would be that it a secular state, but the founding principles were Judeo-Christian.

In your opinion, was the secular nature of the new nation violated by the acknowledgement of God officially in statements such as this?


"When we view the blessings with which our country has been favored, those which we now enjoy, and the means which we possess of handing them down unimpaired to our latest posterity, our attention is irresistibly drawn to the source from whence they flow. Let us then, unite in offering our most grateful acknowledgments for these blessings to the Divine Author of All Good."


-James Monroe, 5th U.S. President, second annual message to congress, Nov.16,1818.
 

NaasPreacher (C4K)

Well-Known Member
In your opinion, was the secular nature of the new nation violated by the acknowledgement of God officially in statements such as this?


"When we view the blessings with which our country has been favored, those which we now enjoy, and the means which we possess of handing them down unimpaired to our latest posterity, our attention is irresistibly drawn to the source from whence they flow. Let us then, unite in offering our most grateful acknowledgments for these blessings to the Divine Author of All Good."


-James Monroe, 5th U.S. President, second annual message to congress, Nov.16,1818.

I have no problems with the personal views of some of the Founding Fathers, in fact I am glad that some of them were believers. The secular nature of a state is not compromised by the personal faith of its leaders be they Christian, Deist, Muslim, or anything else. I don't think there is any doubt that a higher percentage of them had a personal relationship with Christ then than now, but that does not make the nation Christian. Nations cannot be Christian - it is impossible since Christianity is a matter of personal faith.

They were also wise enough to create a secular state, not some kind of quasi-theocracy. They were wise enough to leave any mention of God out of the Constitution. That document, not president's speeches, is was our country is based on.

America is not some kind of second Israel that somehow merits God's divine favour because she gives Him tacit recognition.

Today we say 'In God We Trust' while millions of children die in legalised murder factories.

These things ought not so to be.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
C4k- Though I can agree with you on some of the individual points you make, I must still disagree with you about the motto vote.

Having said that, I think it is refreshing to have a debate that does not become heated or devolves into a contest.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What evidence to you have that America ever was a nation 'whose God is the Lord?' The only nation who ever had God as their Lord was Israel.

Also, how does falsely claiming the a nation trusts God make a nation righteous?

'In God we Trust' is a lie. Perpetuating a lie does not make it true.

No more so than any one of several mottos. The Boy Scouts is "Be prepared". Are all of them always always prepared? The Marine Corps motto os "Always faithful" Is each individual Marine always faithful? I could go on.

The point is that a stated motto will almost never apply to every one, but they can be worthy goals for everyone , nevertheless.
 

NaasPreacher (C4K)

Well-Known Member
C4k- Though I can agree with you on some of the individual points you make, I must still disagree with you about the motto vote.

Having said that, I think it is refreshing to have a debate that does not become heated or devolves into a contest.

Thanks - I agree.
 

NaasPreacher (C4K)

Well-Known Member
No more so than any one of several mottos. The Boy Scouts is "Be prepared". Are all of them always always prepared? The Marine Corps motto os "Always faithful" Is each individual Marine always faithful? I could go on.

The point is that a stated motto will almost never apply to every one, but they can be worthy goals for everyone , nevertheless.

Interesting perspective, one I had not considered.

However, the Boy Scouts' desire is to be prepared. The Marines' goal is to be faithful.

How many of these 400 or so politicians even desire that America should trust God?
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Interesting perspective, one I had not considered.

However, the Boy Scouts' desire is to be prepared. The Marines' goal is to be faithful.

How many of these 400 or so politicians even desire that America should trust God?


If you were to ask them, I believe a large majority would say yes.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Hey, C4, Ireland is a liar too. She may affirm the life of an unborn child on paper, but what actions are taken against the 4400 women a year going into the UK for abortions? And before you make a comparison, as a percentage of population, there isn't much of a difference.
 
Top