Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
My personal experiences with them would be many seemed to be Kjvo, and into separation so much that even non IBF Baptist churches were very suspectSome are - some not - depends on the individual pastor/church
But on the other hand - how do you ID a Fundamental?
I consider myself a fundie - and I am affiliated with the SBC!
and not just separation but secondary separationMy personal experiences with them would be many seemed to be Kjvo, and into separation so much that even non IBF Baptist churches were very suspect
"Those present voted an enthusiastic no on each of the questions except the fourth. For all intents and purposes the affirmation of the Cotton Grove Resolutions launched the Landmark movement in the Southern Baptist Convention. Walter Shurden in his book Not a Silent People, did not fail to notice the importance of what was implied by the Cotton Grove Resolutions:1st. Can Baptists with their principles on the Scriptures, consistently recognize those societies not organized according to the Jerusalem church, but possessing different government, different officers, a different class of members, different ordinances, doctrines and practices as churches of Christ?
2d. Ought they to be called gospel churches or churches in a religious sense?
3d. Can we consistently recognize the ministers of such irregular and unscriptural bodies as gospel ministers?
4th. Is it not virtually recognizing them as official ministers to invite them into our pulpits or by any other act that would or could be construed as such recognition?
5th. Can we consistently address as brethren those professing Christianity who not only have the doctrine of Christ and walk not according to his commandments but are arrayed in direct and bitter opposition to them?[31]
"Though the term Landmarkism did not become the catchword of the movement until J. M. Pendleton used it in his 1854 tract An Old Landmark Re-set,[33] the movement gained its first adherents and initial support at the Cotton Grove Baptist Church on June 24, 1851..."In essence, these resolutions disavowed the authority of non-Baptist churches, ministers, and ordinances. The conclusions of the Cotton Grove Resolutions were clear to all: only Baptist churches are gospel churches! All other churches and denominations Graves labeled “religious societies.[32]
Interesting read and backstory, brother. Thanks for the insights and history of the Landmark Baptist brethren. Trained in schools in the North, much of the events in Tennessee and in the SBC are "foreign" to me
I grew up in Central NY - never knew about Landmark Bap - until I arrive in Germany (US Arm) I visited such a church! (the story of that one is long and extensive!) But that is when I first was given a copy of "The Trail of Blood" and informed about closed communion and their other doctrines. In Fact, at one time we had a member here on BB who was a member of that church. (small world) Off hand, I do not remember who that was - or if he is even currently on the BB.Interesting read and backstory, brother. Thanks for the insights and history of the Landmark Baptist brethren. Trained in schools in the North, much of the events in Tennessee and in the SBC are "foreign" to me