Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Maybe you should go back and read again, the quote I was responding to says " Though capital punishment may irrevocably punish an innocent party it must be said that that is a risk worth taking." You do not find a problem with this?quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though capital punishment may irrevocably punish an innocent party it must be said that that is a risk worth taking.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Katie says "A risk worth taking? That would be state sanctioned murder, killing someone innocent of the accused crime is nothing but murder to satisify our thrist for blood.
If we as a country murder innocent people then we are the ones sinning against God."
If we are deliberately executing the innocent, then of course you are right, but this hardly constitutes "capital punishment properly applied."
Beyond all reasonable doubt, and yet some innocents are being executed, thast murder for the sake of murder, and calling it legal.I agree. No one should be executed if there is the slightest doubt about their guilt, and it behoves those in authority to establish their prosecution beyond ALL reasonable doubt.
According to Bob Dylan, yes.Originally posted by Jim1999:
[QB]We should instruct our son to do what is right and,,,,,,,,,,,,if he doesn't listen, he should be stoned......scriptural.
And the prostitutes should be stoned......
And any number of persons should be stoned.....
So then you see no moral difference between a convicted murderer and an innocent little baby?It is amazing that many will condemn a woman for having an abortion under any circumstances, but will gladly stretch a neck despite the fact that they may be the victim of an injustice at human hands.
So you would kill the innocent and spare the guilty. How barbaric indeed.Originally posted by Jim1999:
It is amazing that many will condemn a woman for having an abortion under any circumstances, but will gladly stretch a neck despite the fact that they may be the victim of an injustice at human hands.
Cheers,
Jim
Our Lord God does give that authority tooriginally posted by D Moore:
[qiote]I understand what you are saying and I
agree that ultimately Pilate had no power
to kill Christ, but that which was given to
Him from God. But it is that same Divine
authority that permits goverments to
exercise capital punishment upon capital
offenders. It is no more a case of murder
than the soldier who kills others in war.
Does not Romans 13 teach that God gives
authority to the "higher powers" including
the right to wield the sword against wrong
doers?
I believe that our Lord and the Father are One.Originally posted by Preach the Word:
. . . Does Jesus ever teach capital punishment?
Does Paul ever teach capital punishment?
Since this was not addressed to anyone inOriginally posted by g'day mate:
What punnishment would you give to those who are responsible for sept 11
If you need somebody to carry the death sentence
you will not need to look far
John
Mark 12: [17] And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.Originally posted by Preach the Word:
Jesus made a very specific reference to capital punishment. Was he for it or agin' it?
http://www.murdervictims.com/Forgiveness.htmThe bodies of the three teenage girls murdered by a fellow student at Heath High School in West Paducah, Ky., were not yet cold before the students of the Christian prayer group that was shot at announced, "We forgive you, Mike," referring to Michael Carneal, 14, the murderer.
This immediate and automatic forgiveness is not surprising. Over the past generation, the idea that a central message of Christianity is to forgive everyone who commits evil against anyone, no matter how great and cruel and whether or not the evildoer repents, has been adopted by much of Christendom.
The number of examples is almost as large as the number of heinous crimes. But one other recent example stands out. In August, the pastor at a Martha's Vineyard church service attended by the vacationing President Clinton announced that it was the the duty of all Christians to forgive Timothy McVeigh, the murderer of 168 Americans. "I invite you to look at a picture of Timothy McVeigh and then forgive him," the Rev. John Miller said in his sermon. "I have, and I ask you to do so."
The pastor acknowledged: "Considering what he did, that may be a formidable task. But it is the one that we as Christians are asked to do."
Though I am a Jew, I believe that a vibrant Christianity is essential if America's moral decline is to be reversed and that despite theological differences, there is indeed a Judeo-Christian value system that has served as the bedrock of American civilization. For these reasons I am appalled and frightened by this feel-good doctrine of automatic forgiveness.
This doctrine undermines the moral foundations of American civilization because it advances the amoral notion that no matter how much you hurt other people, millions of your fellow citizens will immediately forgive you. This doctrine destroys Christianity's central moral tenets about forgiveness - that forgiveness, even by God, is contingent on the sinner repenting, and that it can only be given to the sinner by the one against whom he sinned.
These tenets are unambiguously affirmed in Luke 17:3-4: "And if your brother sins against you, rebuke him; and if he repents, forgive him. And if seven times of the day he sins against you, and seven times of the day turns to you saying, I repent, you shall forgive him."
This flies in the face of what passes for Christianity these days - the declaration, often repeated, that "It is the Christian's duty to forgive just as Jesus forgave those who crucified him." Of course, Jesus asked God to forgive those who crucified him. But Jesus never asked God to forgive those who had crucified thousands of other innocent people - presumably because he recognized that no one has the moral right to forgive evil done to others.
You and I have no right, religiously or morally, to forgive Timothy McVeigh or Michael Carneal; only those they sinned against have that right - and those they murdered are dead and therefore cannot forgive them. (Indeed, that is why I believe that humans cannot forgive a murderer.) If we are automatically forgiven no matter what we do - even if we do not repent, why repent? In fact, if we forgive everybody for all the evil they do to anybody, God and his forgiveness are entirely unnecessary. Those who forgive all evil done to others have substituted themselves for God.
As a side note Sheeagle, my pastor was pastor to one of those girls, Jessica James, he was the one who baptized her, his wife lead her to the Lord, and she and several others from his previous church preformed some interpetive dance at our church just months before the shooting, I met her, it was a major blow to our church. Her parents now speak at churches, although I haven't had the oppertunity to hear them, as I understand from my pastor, it's about forgiveness. My pastor did Jessicas funeral.he bodies of the three teenage girls murdered by a fellow student at Heath High School in West Paducah, Ky., were not yet cold before the students of the Christian prayer group that was shot at announced, "We forgive you, Mike," referring to Michael Carneal, 14, the murderer.