Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I agree with the article....except that the unborn are not citizens (per our qualification of citizenship), so it does become a moral issue and not one of governmental responsibility.This may help. From a Christian perspective, it's not that complicated.
How Should Christians Vote? A Question Of Origins?
I agree with the article....except that the unborn are not citizens (per our qualification of citizenship), so it does become a moral issue and not one of governmental responsibility.
I came up from it from this comment - " If God’s purpose for government is to protect its citizens, I can’t think of anyone more in need of protection than the unborn." Quite simply, the unborn are not citizens of a government (at least not citizens when it comes to the US Government). They are unborn and therefore do not meet the qualification to be a "citizen". As I said, I agree with the rest of the article (protecting life...regardless of citizenship). The role of a government transcends how it governs its citizens. It also includes how it acts on a broader scale.Hmmm. Not sure how you came to that conclusion. The article is about the divine purpose of government—why God put it in place. It boils down to punishing evil and protecting (ministering to) the innocent. It's talking about human beings, and the unborn qualify in God's eyes. Protecting all humans is something all governments should do.
...Quite simply, the unborn are not citizens of a government (at least not citizens when it comes to the US Government).....
God does not consider all men, women, and children....and the unborn....as citizens of the United States. That's nonsense. Of course a nation is to rightly govern, to include actions that impact non-citizens under their charge. But that doesn't make them citizens. I don't know why you are insisting so hard that secular government somehow sets the standard for moral accountability. Do you believe that the United States is somehow God's governing body for mankind? Sort of a modern day Israel....a theocracy? If so, then consider this...in the OT, God did not consider non-Jews to be citizens of Israel (although Israel was certainly responsible for how they treated these non-citizens). You need to revisit your ideologies here.Says who? That may be policy in some governments, but not God's. At one time our country didn't consider black Americans to be full citizens. Do you agree with that?
The question is not, "What does my government consider a citizen?" it's "What does God consider a citizen?" Children, Women, All Colors, and the Unborn are all humans in God's eyes, and therefore should be considered citizens and protected.
The "gamble" is always there. We never really know how a candidate will turn out once elected. At least with Trump there is a decent platform (not one openly hostile to the Christian faith).How do I choose?
In this case - in this election I choose Trump because he has promised to repeal Roe vs. wade and appoint justices to prevent the pro-murder party from advancing.
A gamble? Yes but I'm taking it.
HankD
The government wants it both ways. If a pregnant woman is murdered they will declare two people were murdered. If a woman wants to kill her baby in the womb they will argue the person in the womb had no right to life.I agree with the article....except that the unborn are not citizens (per our qualification of citizenship), so it does become a moral issue and not one of governmental responsibility.
How do I choose?
In this case - in this election I choose Trump because he has promised to repeal Roe vs. wade and appoint justices to prevent the pro-murder party from advancing.
A gamble? Yes but I'm taking it.
Yet, the best SC J that Hillary would appoint would be worse than any SC J that Trump would appoint.
God does not consider all men, women, and children....and the unborn....as citizens of the United States. That's nonsense. ....
I agree with the article except the classification of the unborn as "citizens". The reason I disagree is that I do not think citizenship as an important issue (and the unborn are in fact not legal citizens of the US) when compared to abortion as an offense against a holy God. Abortion is the murder of children, plain and simple. People who reside in the US also reside under the responsibility of our government (to include resident aliens, citizens of other countries....it's a human issue).No the nonsense is you not reading my post carefully and responding with this. The issue is not wether the unborn are citizens of the US but whether they are considered citizens of the lands they live in and protected by their governments. God set up governments to protect and even minister to the innocent.
What you're doing is trying to find a way to justify legalized abortion in some countries (which is just legalized murder). No Christian should be tolerant of this.
I agree with the article except the classification of the unborn as "citizens". The reason I disagree is that I do not think citizenship as an important issue (and the unborn are in fact not legal citizens of the US) when compared to abortion as an offense against a holy God. Abortion is the murder of children, plain and simple. People who reside in the US also reside under the responsibility of our government (to include resident aliens, citizens of other countries....it's a human issue).
It is not a matter of being a citizen, but of being human. A human is a human regardless of citizenship. Our government is responsible and accountable for what it does to people....young, old, and unborn. My emphasis on citizenship was simply because the topic extends beyond the unborn and to people as a whole.
And no, it is foolish to try and tell me that I'm trying to find a way to justify legalized abortions in some countries. I'm saying this is a human issue, a God issue, and an issue over which that no Christian should remain silent. Abortion is murdering babies, plain and simple. You have severely misunderstood my position.
I support Trump's platform with the exception of reworking the VA (making them compete for dollars in terms of care). But I don't think that he's worked out this one well. I don't think that Trump is the best candidate in terms of character and morals (immorality also plays into abortion), but I am not voting on the basis of his character. I will vote for Trump because I support that platform.
I agree with the article except the classification of the unborn as "citizens". The reason I disagree is that I do not think citizenship as an important issue (and the unborn are in fact not legal citizens of the US) when compared to abortion as an offense against a holy God. Abortion is the murder of children, plain and simple. People who reside in the US also reside under the responsibility of our government (to include resident aliens, citizens of other countries....it's a human issue).
It is not a matter of being a citizen, but of being human. A human is a human regardless of citizenship. Our government is responsible and accountable for what it does to people....young, old, and unborn. My emphasis on citizenship was simply because the topic extends beyond the unborn and to people as a whole.
And no, it is foolish to try and tell me that I'm trying to find a way to justify legalized abortions in some countries. I'm saying this is a human issue, a God issue, and an issue over which that no Christian should remain silent. Abortion is murdering babies, plain and simple. You have severely misunderstood my position.
I support Trump's platform with the exception of reworking the VA (making them compete for dollars in terms of care). But I don't think that he's worked out this one well. I don't think that Trump is the best candidate in terms of character and morals (immorality also plays into abortion), but I am not voting on the basis of his character. I will vote for Trump because I support that platform.
You said that I am trying to find a way to justify legalized abortion. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt by calling this a misunderstanding. I am saying the responsibility of a government goes beyond its citizens.It don't think I'm misunderstanding your position, I think you're misunderstanding my critique. I'm saying your position is illogical. Currently, liberals are making the very argument you are making, with the purpose of keeping abortion legal. The unborn are not citizens and therefore killing them cannot be considered murder. You may not want this murder to happen, but it's happening precisely because of this flawed argument you and many liberals are putting forth.
All humans beings should have citizenship somewhere in the world, and all governments should protect their unborn citizens. This is God's purpose for government.
You said that I am trying to find a way to justify legalized abortion. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt by calling this a misunderstanding. I am saying the responsibility of a government goes beyond its citizens.