AVL1984
<img src=../ubb/avl1984.jpg>
LOL. Good question!Originally posted by Renewed:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mr. Curtis:
How many folks here have left churches where anything goes, where folks can serve wearing shorts & T-shirts, where the music is so loud hat the elderly can't stand it, where when they are not challenged to go out & be seperate from the world, where nobody mentions that 90% of our friends are going to hell, where the bible doesn't really exclude women pastors, where missionaries aren't supported, and doctrine is compromised to bring more people in ?
I understand your reason behind it, and the intended sarcasm.
What I'd like to challenge you to do is give a biblical definition of separation, and give me the benefits of inundating your neighbor with in your face tracts as opposed to a little lifestyle evangelism.
You see, I have found that typical IFB's do a number of things that would seem untypical of Christianity. Sure, we may look good in suits or flowing skirts and a KJV in our hands, being led by pastors who teach us to follow them even if we think they're wrong, taking great caution to have a biblical style of clothing and hair (which I'd love to have someone show me where slacks on women or hair that touches the top of your ears is unbiblical) and spending five minutes trying to convert a person to Christianity.
BUT
How many of those people are true converts? How much of the true bible are you learning each Sunday, or is it the salvation message each week and expressions of extreme concern over whether you're looking the part and dressing up to IFB standards? What would they say if you were friendly with the SBC church or another denomination, or worked cooperatively with other Christians from another church? What if you told them that you were saved hearing the message from an NIV? Would your salvation be questioned? Probably.
In my point of view now, typical IFB's are not representative of true biblical Christians. A true Christian teaches God through his complete lifestyle, Christ in him naturally, not because of whether they follow some man-made standards. A true Christian pastor will not even hint to his congregation that they should continue to follow him should he be wrong, since he is the man of God. A true Christian will help other Christians, and a true Christian will realize that another Christian is not a false one if he/she decides that a non-IFB church is where they will learn and grow best.
R</font>[/QUOTE]I very well understand both sides. I've preached for both the BMA and the Independents. I have found that in IFB churches, the letter of the law is what abounds, and not the grace of Jesus Christ. I guarantee you what I see in the people of the SBC I'm currently attending is real salvation. Unless someone can fake Christianity that well, I would have to say most of the teens in the church are Christians, living for the Lord. I do see that some are having their standards move up, though the standards in the church allow them to "come as they are" within reason.
I cannot find anywhere in the Bible where it is unscriptural for women to wear slacks to the services or the men to have hair touching their ears, or even having facial hair. But most of the HYLISTIC type mindsets do try to make these minor things MAJOR DOCTRINES, taking away the working of the Holy Spirit and taking that job upon themselves. No wonder we have so many become disenchanted with Christianity and forsaking the churches. Preachers in most IFB churches expect "cookie cutter" (clone) Christians. It doesn't work that way.
