• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

How many people here are able to tell the difference between...

Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnDeereFan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well, I am glad that you are not calling me a name for disagreeing with you again, as usual in my case.

Oh, good. I thought it was just me he did that to.

He also likes to use his moderator privilege to edit my posts. In another thread, where I made two long and detailed refutations of a poster's posts he happened to agree with, he just deleted them.

And yet, when somebody breaks the rules, we have to beg and plead for the moderators to address it.

Unfortunately, this place has become no better than CARM, where a corrupt moderating staff has turned it into a playground for trolls.

Let's see, a federal action under a Democrat FDR and a federal action (imprisonment of Debs) under a Democrat Woodrow Wilson--it was the Democrats who put people in concentration camps. Democrats controlled Congress and Democrats controlled the White House. FDR had 4 terms.

Oh, and it was Democrat Obama who put that poor Egyptian in prison, charging him with the responsibility of Benghazi.

I'm sure this will be edited out or deleted, but no matter how much Squire Robertsson wants to defend his Progressive heroes, the fact remains that EO 9066, the executive order that sent Japanese Americans to prison camps with no due process and for no reason other than their ethnicity, is squarely on FDR's shoulders.
 

matt wade

Well-Known Member
Oh, good. I thought it was just me he did that to.

He also likes to use his moderator privilege to edit my posts. In another thread, where I made two long and detailed refutations of a poster's posts he happened to agree with, he just deleted them.

And yet, when somebody breaks the rules, we have to beg and plead for the moderators to address it.

Unfortunately, this place has become no better than CARM, where a corrupt moderating staff has turned it into a playground for trolls.



I'm sure this will be edited out or deleted, but no matter how much Squire Robertsson wants to defend his Progressive heroes, the fact remains that EO 9066, the executive order that sent Japanese Americans to prison camps with no due process and for no reason other than their ethnicity, is squarely on FDR's shoulders.



Then we can assume that since its so bad here, you'll be leaving? Don't let the door hit you on the way out! :wavey:
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Oh, good. I thought it was just me he did that to.

He also likes to use his moderator privilege to edit my posts. In another thread, where I made two long and detailed refutations of a poster's posts he happened to agree with, he just deleted them.

And yet, when somebody breaks the rules, we have to beg and plead for the moderators to address it.

Unfortunately, this place has become no better than CARM, where a corrupt moderating staff has turned it into a playground for trolls.



I'm sure this will be edited out or deleted, but no matter how much Squire Robertsson wants to defend his Progressive heroes, the fact remains that EO 9066, the executive order that sent Japanese Americans to prison camps with no due process and for no reason other than their ethnicity, is squarely on FDR's shoulders.

The rules here are subject to change without notice.
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
JDF, what you seem to not understand is the guilt for Japanese relocation was a bi-partisan (Democrat and Republican). I'm not letting FDR and his crowd off the hook. I'm saying look at the record and see there were plenty of California Republicans pushing for the dispossession and relocation of the Japanese-American Community.
 

wpe3bql

Member
The civilian leading the charge for Japanese internment was Earl Warren as much a Republican as they come. In 1948, he was Dewey's vice presidential running mate.

Warren was also appointed to the US Supreme Court as Chief Justice of the US, presumably during the Eisenhower Administration. He was CA governor prior to that, and it was President Nixon who appointed Warren Burger to replace Earl Warren.

Earl Warren probably never was a conservative in whatever state or federal office he held. I remember that as a High School student hearing about a "Impeach Earl Warren" movement in the late 1950's - through to the late 1960's .

I don't recall what specifically they wanted him impeached for, maybe it was for something he might have done with respect to the school desegregation decision in 1954, or possibly with some of the rulings on school prayer and/or Bible reading in the early 1960's.
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Internment, mass ethnic based internment is not the act of a free people or a free society.

No matter how you slice it, all politicians and government officials supporting this black era in the history of our nation were wrong and performed an illegal act for which they should have been jailed.

It is, in reality, not much different from what we did to the Native Americans in the 1800s.

Both are poxes on the house of this nation.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oh, good. I thought it was just me he did that to.

He also likes to use his moderator privilege to edit my posts. In another thread, where I made two long and detailed refutations of a poster's posts he happened to agree with, he just deleted them.

And yet, when somebody breaks the rules, we have to beg and plead for the moderators to address it.

Unfortunately, this place has become no better than CARM, where a corrupt moderating staff has turned it into a playground for trolls.



I'm sure this will be edited out or deleted, but no matter how much Squire Robertsson wants to defend his Progressive heroes, the fact remains that EO 9066, the executive order that sent Japanese Americans to prison camps with no due process and for no reason other than their ethnicity, is squarely on FDR's shoulders.

It is very difficult for liberals not to censor free-speech and liberals don't mind calling people vile names to squelch free speech. It is just false to think that people are born with consciences or some sort of knowledge of right and wrong. We have a lot of people on this board who have no resemblance to Evangelicals or Fundamentalist and who seem to hate them and to live just to express their hatred.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Internment, mass ethnic based internment is not the act of a free people or a free society.

No matter how you slice it, all politicians and government officials supporting this black era in the history of our nation were wrong and performed an illegal act for which they should have been jailed.

It is, in reality, not much different from what we did to the Native Americans in the 1800s.

Both are poxes on the house of this nation.

And so was the imprisonment of Debs for free speech by white-supremacist Wilson and so was the imprisonment of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula by Clinton/Obama.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
It is very difficult for liberals not to censor free-speech and liberals don't mind calling people vile names to squelch free speech. It is just false to think that people are born with consciences or some sort of knowledge of right and wrong. We have a lot of people on this board who have no resemblance to Evangelicals or Fundamentalist and who seem to hate them and to live just to express their hatred.

Yep and anyone that disagrees with that is in league with the enemy, is a danger to the nation and should just shut up or be banned. Right?

Neocons and their double standards. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JohnDeereFan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Where's the "finger prints" then?

The "finger prints" are that Sapper Woody's posts still contain his responses to my deleted posts.

So, unless Squire wants to argue that Sapper Woody was falsely attributing words to me, I'd be curious to hear why he believes those posts are no longer there.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
The "finger prints" are that Sapper Woody's posts still contain his responses to my deleted posts.

So, unless Squire wants to argue that Sapper Woody was falsely attributing words to me, I'd be curious to hear why he believes those posts are no longer there.

You're more likely to see . . . THREAD CLOSED. :smilewinkgrin:

With no due process?

Due process? That's only for the rich and famous.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top