How the CP helps hide the secret sin of liberalism...

[KenH]

Originally posted by Daniel David:
It is because of the "war on terror" that I refuse to vote for Ms. Peroutka.

So you are going to do what, DD? Vote for that little girly man, George W. Bush?

Sorry, DD, but you left yourself wide open for that one.

 

[just-want-peace]

I don't believe that just because he won means that is is God's will anymore than I believe that it was God's will for Bill Clinton to win two terms. Regardless of who wins in November we are all in God's hands.

(Bold Mine!)

1Sa 8:7 And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.
(Bold Mine!)

I think the bold part of your statement matches the bold part of God's statement.

The USA got two terms of Bill Clinton because the USA had (has?) effectively rejected HIM!

Don't matter squat who gets in this year, if we as a nation continue to reject Him!

 

[KenH]

Originally posted by just-want-peace:
The USA got two terms of Bill Clinton because the USA had (has?) effectively rejected HIM!

So is that the same reason we have had to endure fours years of George W. Bush as well with all of the death and carnage that has happened during his term in office?

 

[Daniel David]

Netpub, good catch. I must have typed the wrong letter. I meant to say Mr. Peroutka.

 

[JGrubbs]

Originally posted by Daniel David:
Netpub, good catch. I must have typed the wrong letter. I meant to say Mr. Peroutka.

Forgiven!!

 

[KenH]

A Freudian Slip perhaps, DD?

 

[Daniel David]

Wouldn't that be "type" Ken?

 

[Pennsylvania Jim]

DD, I your post makes no sense at all. Have you ever been to a CP event? You should check it out.

 

[Hyperspace]

Originally posted by Daniel David:
What is the real inspiration though? Is it because they are all really closet liberals who are afraid (a common liberal attribute) to let people know? Are they really working with John Kerry? This is something that must be probed.

.
They have medicine for your paranoia.

http://www.mentalhealth.com/

 

[Hyperspace]

Originally posted by Joseph_Botwinick:
When Peroutka does lose, and if Bush does win (if he doesn't get Naderized by the CP), will you then recognize it as God's will for Bush to be president?

Joseph Botwinick

.
Joseph,
Do you recognize it was God's will when Bill Clinton was President?

 

[Joseph_Botwinick]

I dunno,

I have been asking the same question ever since they began spewing out the same anti-Bush rhetoric as the DEMS. I think there might be a connection. I see some of the CP supporters salivating over the idea that Bush might lose this year, even though, deep down they know Peroutka won't win (They won't say so, but they know it is true). That tells me that what they really want is for Kerry to win. Shame. Shame.

Joseph Botwinick

 

[Daniel David]

Yes. Every official in the world has been placed their by God himself. That would be yet another reason why "christians" spending all their time in politics is wrong.

 

[JGrubbs]

Originally posted by Joseph_Botwinick:
I have been asking the same question ever since they began spewing out the same anti-Bush rhetoric as the DEMS. I think there might be a connection. I see some of the CP supporters salivating over the idea that Bush might lose this year, even though, deep down they know Peroutka won't win (They won't say so, but they know it is true). That tells me that what they really want is for Kerry to win. Shame. Shame.

Gridlock caused from Kerry in the Whitehouse and the GOP in Congress would be better than four more years of the GOP Congress doing every thing Bush asks them to do.

 

[Joseph_Botwinick]

So, that is the goal? To elect Kerry?

Shame. Shame.

Joseph Botwinick

 

[Daniel David]

Who would've guessed.

 

[JGrubbs]

Originally posted by Joseph_Botwinick:
So, that is the goal? To elect Kerry?

No, the goal is to vote for the person with the best principles and policies for our country and leave the results in God's hands. We survived eight years of Clinton, and will survive four years of Kerry, if the Lord permits it.

Bush has succeeded in increasing the size of the federal government, the federal budget and federal debt more than any liberal democrat could ever accomplish with a GOP Congress. I don't think we can afford another four years with Bush in the Whitehouse. I would rather have someone like Michael Peroutka in the Whitehouse, but if so-called conservative Christians would rather support a "liberal" like Bush, then I guess four years of gridlock if Kerry wins would be better than four more years of federal expansion.

 

[Joseph_Botwinick]

Shame. Shame.

Shame on the Consticrat Party.

Joseph Botwinick

 

[fromtheright]

NetPublicist,

Howard Phillips served in the Nixon administration, John Lofton served in the Bush I administration, Chuck Baldwin was honored by Ronald Reagan, Michael Peroutka used to work for the federal government. All of these members of the Constitution Party left the GOP when the GOP started moving to the left and acting unconstitutionally.

Yikes! Gasp!

You mean the same Nixon Administration that instituted wage-price controls? The same Nixon Administration that opened the doors to Red (i.e., Communist) China? The one who said "We're all Keynesians now." Who cursed vividly in the White House?

The same Ronald Reagan who appointed Justices Souter and O'Connor to the Supreme Court, where they've refused to turn loose of Roe v. Wade? The Ronald Reagan that signed liberalized abortion legislation in California?

How could Peroutka have clambered into the wagon with such a bunch of compromisers? Can he really be a conservative?

So, where did Peroutka work in the federal government? Is that supposed to qualify him for President? The ballot might get rather crowded if that's all it takes.

 

[KenH]

What is takes, per the federal constitution, is this:

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

Plus getting past all of the candidate stifling ballot access roadblocks set up by the Demopublican Party.

 

[JGrubbs]

Originally posted by fromtheright:
You mean the same Nixon Administration that instituted wage-price controls? The same Nixon Administration that opened the doors to Red (i.e., Communist) China? The one who said "We're all Keynesians now." Who cursed vividly in the White House?

These are many of the reasons why Howard Phillips quit his job with the Nixon administration. I guess working on the inside of a Republican administration opened his eyes. Shortly after leaving the Nixion administration, Phillips founded the Conservative Caucus and has been fighing against all of those things you have listed.

Originally posted by fromtheright:
The same Ronald Reagan who appointed Justices Souter and O'Connor to the Supreme Court, where they've refused to turn loose of Roe v. Wade? The Ronald Reagan that signed liberalized abortion legislation in California?

Yes, the same Reagan, I didn't say that Dr. Baldwin was working for Reagan, I said that Reagan honored him and his church.

Originally posted by fromtheright:
How could Peroutka have clambered into the wagon with such a bunch of compromisers? Can he really be a conservative?

Howard Phillips, Michael Peroutka, Chuck Baldwin and most of the Constitution Party members and supporters, including myself, have all repented of our sin of blindly following the Republican party and the GOP leadership.

I assume that you are still supporting the Republican party and George W. Bush, who supports all of the liberal policies that were put in place by the GOP leaders of the past, but has removed the conservative policies from the GOP platform and helped the Republican party move to the left on those issues.