loving2daysyouth
New Member
Well, that's neither here nor there, a Pastor shouldn't be attacked for his stance, but his doctrine!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Or north Missouri for that matter?Originally posted by C4K:
Wow! Does that mean that most of the conservative, independent Baptist churches in Western Europe don't have a love for the Lord, the right beliefs, and compassion towards others?
Apologies for the off topic comment.
But loving2daysyouth, is that not what you are you doing here?It's not your job to "educate"
If someone is promoting false doctrine then it is the job of discerning believers to oppose it and point people away from it.Originally posted by loving2daysyouth:
If you choose to not be associated, that's fine, do so, if you are "fully persuaded" in your own mind. The bashing part is both unBiblical and unfounded. It's not your job to "educate"
What Bible have you read? So you don't like Paul too much and God who had it recorded?Originally posted by loving2daysyouth:
Glad to see some people never give up!
I hope when I die, everyone knocks on my ministry.
When I play ball, I enjoy people talking "trash" because it means they are threatened by me and my ability. They don't pay attention to the one's with no skill.
This is the same thing: You all kill a dead man constantly (I've not been here in 2 days!) because of whatever reasons, I believe, you feel threatened. According to the Word of God, constant bashing is causing a "schism" in the body of Christ.
Au contraire,Originally posted by Soulman:
You get the same beliefs out of the KJV as any other baptists. You folks gotta remember that if a church is kjo, they still believe salvation by grace etc. It is not a doctrinal iossue. It is preference. Many make such a big deal out of it because they feel they have to defend themselves. Say what you will. The kjv is still the best preserved translation in our language.
No, you merely state an opinion.Originally posted by 4His_glory:
When you say that the KJV is "God's preserved Word for the English speaking people" and that all other versions are a unmentional word in this forum, you have made it a doctrine.
No, you simply demonstrate a lack of compassion and forfeit any opportunity to minister to them. Still, it is no doctrine.When you call thoes who use other versions "heretics" and seperate from them, you have made it a doctrine.
No, you simply demonstrate a lack of discernment. Again, forfeiting the opportunity to minister. Still, no doctrine.When you say that KJVO is a matter of faith and you question the faith of thoses who disagree with you, you are makeing it a doctrine.
I agree, this is false doctrine.When you like Jack Hyles did, claim that a person can only be save from the KJV you have added to the Gospel of Christ and have created your own doctrine.
No, you merely state an opinion.Originally posted by Pastor_Bob:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 4His_glory:
When you say that the KJV is "God's preserved Word for the English speaking people" and that all other versions are a unmentional word in this forum, you have made it a doctrine.
No, you simply demonstrate a lack of compassion and forfeit any opportunity to minister to them. Still, it is no doctrine.When you call thoes who use other versions "heretics" and seperate from them, you have made it a doctrine.
No, you simply demonstrate a lack of discernment. Again, forfeiting the opportunity to minister. Still, no doctrine.When you say that KJVO is a matter of faith and you question the faith of thoses who disagree with you, you are makeing it a doctrine.
I agree, this is false doctrine. </font>[/QUOTE]And yet, Hyles Anderson apparently does consider their position in regards to the KJV as a matter of doctrine. Otherwise, why would they include mention of the TR and the KJV in their "Doctrinal Statement"? (Current College Catalog, p. 5):When you like Jack Hyles did, claim that a person can only be save from the KJV you have added to the Gospel of Christ and have created your own doctrine.
It does NOT say all others are exluded...We accept the Textus Receptus manuscripts from which came the King James Bible.
It does NOT say all others are exluded...Originally posted by I Am Blessed 16:
Their TR merely states:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> We accept the Textus Receptus manuscripts from which came the King James Bible.
Don't DO that to me! I thought the next words were going to be, "...is having a heart attack!".I was breathing very hard, the basketball court was spinning in circles, my 11 year-old daughter Amy was running to the house yelling, "Mommy, Daddy...
Amen!Originally posted by Soulman:
The kjv is still the best preserved translation in our language.