• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

deepblue

New Member
Gospel Standard Baptists as far as I know are a very small proportion of Particular Baptists in the UK. (I don't know the precise numbers). Most Baptists in the UK were at one time Particular Baptists, as statements of faith such as the 1689 London Baptist Confession show. That 1689 Confession is not Hyper-Calvinist. General Baptists degenerated into Unitarianism for a time. (Now, it's the other way round - most Baptist churches in the UK tend to be of the "General" type.
They are a smaller proportion now, yes (to be fair, there are few of either type!). However there were estimated to be at least 400 "Hyper" Calvinist Particular Baptist churches in the 18th and 19th centuries. The Met Tab and some others which were based on 17th Century Calvinism were in the minority.

Yes, the 1689 Baptist Confession is not "Hyper Calvinist". It's based on the 3 covenant framework which came before the second stage development of Calvinism (in the 18th Century). The modern Reformed movement is based on 17th Century Calvinism but as I mentioned some oppose the "free offer" (along with opposing "common grace").

The Wikipedia entry for Reformed Baptists (Reformed Baptists - Wikipedia) is a misleading muddle, as it seems to suggest that Keach, Gill, etc, accepted the 1689 Confession, when in fact they opposed some of it, having formulated a 2 covenant framework for their theology, rather than the 3 covenant framework which was the basis of that and other confessions. The Wikipedia entry looks like it's trying to lump all these figures and their churches under the heading "Reformed Baptists", which is unfortunate. This just exhibits the drawbacks of trying to use Wikipedia to get accurate information! In the main it's fairly accurate, although some of it is misleading.
 
Last edited:
Top