Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What works of Calvin have you read?Rippon said:Do you have any specific quotes of his that demonstrate where he "went to seed"?Or is it possible that you are relying on urban myths?
If anything Calvin's teachings on God's sovereignty stayed within the biblical box.But that box is much more liberating than the narrow confines of much evangelical thought on the subject.
Is your skin orange yet?Spinach said:It's early, though, so I need to make the beds, start the fires, and drink a bit of carrot juice to wake me up.
LOL! No, I don't drink that much of it.gb93433 said:Is your skin orange yet?
gb93433 said:What works of Calvin have you read?
If you have read Calvin's Institutes you would know that Calvin realized the limits of his own theology.
However a number of calvinists I read, tend to limit God in his sovereignty simply because they refuse to believe what the Bible says and tend to interpret what seemingly agrees with them and leave the verses behind that they do not understand and do not seem to fit their theology. If they were not so dogmatic about limiting God's sovereignty, listening to their supporters and study their Bible they might find that their view of God's sovereignty extends far beyond what they teach. However that kind of practice is typical of anyone who holds to a pet theology that fits their own parameters instead of them fitting God's choice of how He reveals himself. It is called eisegesis.
I have yet to see one of them give an interpretation/explanation in light of its historical context of Is. 45:7; Amos 3:6 and Lam. 3:38 .
gb93433 said:I have yet to see one of them give an interpretation/explanation in light of its historical context of Is. 45:7; Amos 3:6 and Lam. 3:38 .
stilllearning said:Hi Rippon
You asked.......
No, I can’t give any quotes, nor did I get this idea from anyone else.
This is just my observation, of the TULIP.
These appear to be, 5 areas where John Calvin was trying to justify “his” idea of God’s Sovereignty.
Salamander said:Since God offers salvation for man to receive the gift, it would make the Lord look stupid to have the Gospel preached to every creature so only some could be saved.
Spinach said:I've never attempted to write this all out. Usually when discussing this, I'm speaking among friends. Please excuse my feeble attempt...
One thing I find common among believers is the belief that "all the promises in the Book are mine". Wrong. The law was given to the Jew. Most of the Bible was written to the Jews and all by Jews.
[Rom 9:4] Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
The Gentile was promised nothing, until Christ...
"We" or "Us":
[Eph 1:1] Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:
[Eph 1:2] Grace be to you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.
[Eph 1:3] Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
[Eph 1:4] According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
[Eph 1:5] Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
[Eph 1:6] To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.
[Eph 1:7] In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;
[Eph 1:8] Wherein he hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence;
[Eph 1:9] Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:
[Eph 1:10] That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:
[Eph 1:11] In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:
[Eph 1:12] That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.
"Ye":
[Eph 1:13] In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
[Eph 1:14] Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.
[Eph 1:15] Wherefore I also, after I heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus, and love unto all the saints,
[Eph 1:16] Cease not to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers;
[Eph 1:17] That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him:
[Eph 1:18] The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints,
[Eph 2:10] For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
[Eph 2:11] Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
[Eph 2:12] That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
[Eph 2:13] But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
Then there is the imposed blindness of Israel (of the which I, as a Gentile, am truly grateful):
[Rom 11:7] What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.
[Rom 11:8] (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hearunto this day.
and:
[Rom 11:28] As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
[Rom 11:29] For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
[Rom 9:10] And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac;
[Rom 9:11] (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth
In conclusion:
[Rom 11:25] For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
[Rom 11:26] And so *all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
[Rom 11:27] For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
[Rom 11:28] As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
[Rom 11:29] For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
[Rom 11:30] For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:
Try it one of these times----read with the "we" and the "ye".
*Bold mine
Can you show scripture that definitively proves the election of Gentiles? With out it then why would you assume Gentiles are elect?Jarthur001 said:so.... which are the elect?
MB said:Can you show scripture that definitively proves the election of Gentiles? With out it then why would you assume Gentiles are elect?
MB
Spinach said:havensdad, you are strong in argument, but your approach is lacking, and pious.
Spinach said:The Gentile was promised nothing, until Christ...
If it has nothing to do with blood lineage then why is it only those descendants of Jacob who are the lineage of Jesus Christ? The Jews were chosen as a people through which Jesus Christ would come.Havensdad said:EH!! Wrong, brother. You can't stop reading there...
Rom 9:6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel,
Rom 9:7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but "Through Isaac shall your offspring be named."
Rom 9:8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.
To summarize: Paul just said that "True Israel" has NOTHING to do with blood lineage. He goes on to point out Esau, who was of Abraham, but NOT Israel.
Havensdad said:The gentile is still promised nothing. Only those who are "grafted in" to Israel, and have become of the "seed of Abraham" are promised anything. This was EXACTLY the same as in the Old Testament...
Which proves that election was not required for Salvation.Havensdad said:Exo 12:48 If a stranger shall sojourn with you and would keep the Passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised. Then he may come near and keep it; he shall be as a native of the land. But no uncircumcised person shall eat of it
We actually have scriptural examples, such as Ruth, of Gentiles who "became" Israelites. There is NO distinction between the Church and Israel, and there never has been.
Speculation at best. There is nothing that would prove this theory at all even though Paul was chosen to be a light unto the Gentiles most of where the man preached were synagogages. Jews were not of the habit to allow Gentiles inside there probably were very few Gentiles that Paul wrote to. The term we could have just as easily been for Paul's brother Jews.Havensdad said:Horrible exegesis. Paul is writing a letter. Do you realize how ridiculous it would be, if I wrote you a letter, saying "you", and someone on the other side said "oh, no, that does not refer to YOU {the person to whom I wrote the letter} it refers to the Zulu nation". That is really forcing something upon the text. Since this is a letter TO someone, the "you" must be interpreted just like any other letter since the dawn of creation: the Church in Ephesus, many of whom were Israelite by blood, and many of whom were former gentiles. The "we" refers to the entirety of the Body of Christ (which is synonymous with Israel), which Ephesus has now become partakers of...
A better, stronger example of "we" and "ye":
Again "we" refers to everyone in the Body of Christ. Paul DOES then go on to elaborate to the gentiles: not to a bloodline, but instead referring to UNCIRCUMCISED peoples: NOT referring to those who had converted to Judaism before becoming Christians.
I believe we are warned about claiming to be a Jew, and about those who claimed to be but aren't.Havensdad said:If you fail to interpret "Israel" in the context of the definition Paul gives in Romans 9, you will continue to fall into error. There is, and only is, and only ever was, ONE people of God> the Body of Christ, also called Israel.
This verse in all scriptures was translated and then Gramar was applied to it. Since the rules of grammar have only existed for the last two centuriesHavensdad said:Act 13:48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
How many believed (pistis, had faith)? All those who had been appointed (assigned) eternal life. What is the causative agent here? Do they have faith because they were appointed, are were they appointed because they had faith?
What a miss application of scripture. The truth is Calvinism is failing that should tell us something.Havensdad said:According to THIS passage, the "assigning" of God, was the causative agent, which then caused the people to have faith, when they heard the word of God preached.
Let me give you the advice of a wise man:
Act 5:38 So in the present case I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or this undertaking is of man, it will fail;
Act 5:39 but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God!"
If I were you I'd pay close attention to it. Especially if you are unable to prove your own doctrine.Havensdad said:I try not to mock or belittle opposing theologies, unless something is very defined in scripture: you might find out you are wrong, and were mocking God...
MB said:If it has nothing to do with blood lineage then why is it only those descendants of Jacob who are the lineage of Jesus Christ? The Jews were chosen as a people through which Jesus Christ would come.
No matter how much grafting Gentiles are adopted and never will be of the seed of Abraham. They will have the same inheritance as if they were Abraham's seed. Yet Gentiles are warned not to boast because those Jews broken off the vine can be grafted in again.
Which proves that election was not required for Salvation.
Speculation at best. There is nothing that would prove this theory at all even though Paul was chosen to be a light unto the Gentiles most of where the man preached were synagogages. Jews were not of the habit to allow Gentiles inside there probably were very few Gentiles that Paul wrote to. The term we could have just as easily been for Paul's brother Jews.
I believe we are warned about claiming to be a Jew, and about those who claimed to be but aren't.
MB