Heavenly Pilgrim said:HP: Here again you beg the question. You state that “He will not kick us out. We cannot be "unborn." You assume without proof at every turn this presupposition of OSAS. Show us from the text where it states what you claim. Your next verse you mention you do the exact same thing.
It is not an assumption. It is a clear teaching of the Book of Hebrews. He is using an illustration of Father/son for a purpose. As the earthly father/son relationship is, so also is the heavenly father/son relationship. That was the whole point of the teaching.
HP: Yes, the picture is that of a father and a son, but what gives one the authority to tell us that the particular nuance of an earthly father/son relationship must of necessity apply to our relationship with our Heavenly Father as born again children?
Because that is a consistent picture all throughout the Bible. God considers those that have taken Christ as their Saviour His children. They are his chosen ones, his children. The very concept of "you must be born again," is precedented on the fact that one is not a child of God when they come into this world, but must be born into the family--hence the second birth. You must be born again! You must be born into the family of God.
Let’s try and expound for a minute on this necessitated consequence you say MUST apply. For instance, why can we not conclude that because one had no choice whatsoever in being a son of a particular earthly father, that one can have absolutely nothing to do to be a son of our Heavenly Father? That would exclude automatically any notion whatsoever of man’s choice having anything whatsoever to do with choosing or rejecting Christ, would it not? Why could not one be assured that all men, being children of God,
The last part of the statement is heretical and thus does not fit your illustration or reasoning. All people are not children of God. You must be born again. You must be born into the family of God. If you haven't trusted Christ as your Saviour you haven't been born again. What did Jesus say about those who had rejected him:
John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
--They weren't born again. They had rejected Christ. They were not in the family of God; in fact the devil was their father. All who are born into this world are born into the family of the devil. Therefore they must be born into God's family. You must be born again.
One becomes a son only by trusting Christ as Saviour.are universally children and as such eternally secure, for you know, once a son always a son, right?
Hell is for those outside of Christ. Those who are outside of Christ are outside of the family of God. They are not born again.Are we to suppose hell is just some kind of discipline afforded His children?
You were born a child of the devil; not a child of God. You must be born again.Why not? I was born into this world a child of God,
There is no fellowship with God if you are not born into God's family. Therein your reasoning falls apart. Torment is for them that are not born again; not in God's family. You must be born again.just as I was born into this world a child of my earthly father. If I am to use your logic of ‘once a son always a son’ universalism reigns and hell is a mere figment of ones delusional aberration of truth. I was born in fellowship with my father. To assume that such could be broken by eternal torment is absolutely contrary to once a son and in fellowship, always a son and treated so without regard to my disobedience or obedience for that matter.
It is well founded all throughout Scripture. It is quite apparent that you do not understand what it means to be born again, to be a child of God.The truth is that there is not a shred of evidence that once a son always a son can be applied to the new birth. An attempt to do so is to try and make an illustration walk on all four legs to support a notion that is otherwise simply unfounded.