I just can't panic

Snowing pretty good in the mountains here. I think I will get my first day in soon. Bro. Curtis what kind of skiing do you do? Backcountry, resort, ski, board?

 

My my my. In that same vein I find it amazing that womanizing, self indulgent, self centered, worldly slob, Bill Clinton's name would pop up now and again. Edited to add treasonous.

 

Sorry for my omission, I make that same mistake all the time.

 

It's mostly the right-wingers who bring up Clinton to bash him or almost anything he did, both as a person or a president.

 

But we still can, but no one has the guts to anymore. We are still idling as a military force, but the POWERS that be are seeing to it that we be stilled. We can't, because of political forces, utilize anything like irresistible force anywhere again, though we still possess it.

 

I never trusted Bill Clinton from the moment I laid eyes on him. My spirit bore witness that he was no good from day one, and that observation never once did i have reason to question. The crowning achievement for me was when he wagged his finger in my/our faces and lied through his teeth. Not one more shred of evidence did I need to know for certain he was lying. The blue dress simply confirmed it. He's a snake in the grass that defiled the office of POTUS like no one before, and that single handedly made it so that children in school would soon begin oral sex because it wasn't really sex. A very bad man in the Christian viewpoint.

 

Yet, on the other hand, somehow your spirit bears witness that republicans are divine. You know the republican trinity: foley, delay, and cunningham, not to speak of the gross incompetence of Bush and Cheney. In the Christian viewpoint, both parties are snakes in the grass. The problem is you cannot tell the difference.

 

Do you apply this policy to all presidents or just the ones you don't like.

When you talk about lying, don't you know they lie regularly when it serves their purpose (as is also true of many people in general). Just one week before the 2006 election, President Bush, on November 1st said he wanted both Cheney and Rumsfield to stay, then after the election he replaced Rumsfield and admitted he had decided to do so a week or so before. When he was asked why he didn't say something before the election, Bush said he didn't want to influence the election. In other words, Bush lied deliberately in order to preserve what he considered to be what was best for the elections. Thank God, he turned out being wrong. If he had said he was dumping Cheney the republicans might not have done so poorly in the election.