• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

If God doesn't have a future for the Jews...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This is where we disagree. I don't believe God cancelled His land promises with the Jews (Rom. 11:28-29). God promised to Abraham that his seed (Christ) would be like the stars in heaven AND like the dust on earth.
I think there are more than sufficient verses in the Bible to show that the promises to the children according to the flesh (Romans 9:6-8) were conditional. Here are just a few: Exodus 19:5 (compare 1 Peter 2:9); Deuteronomy 4:26; 28:15ff; 2 Chronicles 7:19-22; Jeremiah 9:25-26; 12:14-17. It is the spiritual promises in Christ which are irrevocable (eg. Psalm 110:4).

Gen. 15:5 KJV
And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.

Gen. 13:16 KJV
And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. {/QUOTE]
Amen! And so He has done. But, 'Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham' (Galatians 3:7). That great crowd in Revelation 7:9 is of every nation, tribe, etc., but they are all children of Abraham because they are of faith.​

Colossians 1:16 says that there are thrones created for Christ in heaven and on earth.
Col. 1:16. 'For by [Christ] all things were created that are on heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.' I think your interpretation is a bit of a stretch! The 'thrones' etc. are the earthly nations which have been given to Christ (Psalm 2:8-12).
See also Ephesians 1:10.
Even more of a stretch! All things are gathered together in one. That's Jews and Gentiles- one people of God. 'One flock and one Shepherd' (John 10:16).
Paul teaches that Christians (of this dispensation) have no lasting inheritance here on earth (Philipp. 3:20; Eph. 2:6-7; Gal. 4:26; etc.). Jesus says that the Jews inherit earth (Mt 5:5; Rom. 15:8; Gen. 12:7--to thy seed, Christ, I will give this land; etc.).
Matthew 5:5. 'Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.' Come on Jope! You'll have to do better than this!! The earth that is being spoken of is the new heavens and new earth, to which we all-- Jew and Gentile-- are making our way (2 Peter 3:13). Revelation 5:9-10. 'For You were slain, and have redeemed us to God by Your blood out of every tribe and tongue and nation, and have made us kings and priests to our God; and we shall reign upon the earth.' That is not this earth in which we all, like Abraham (Acts 7:5), are pilgrims and strangers, but the new Jerusalem, the 'city that has foundations' to which Abraham was travelling (Hebrews 11:10, 13-16).
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Perhaps I misunderstood. I do see where you say the church exists on earth during the tribulation (I think everyone believes that there will be Christians on earth during the tribulation - those who don't worship the anti-Christ). But pre-tribulation is the belief that the church will be "caught up" to heaven before ("pre") the tribulation (those on earth during the tribulation are those who are saved during the tribulation) - which is not what the early church believed. So you see my confusion here.

The above statement is false. Perhaps you typed pretribulational when you meant premillennial. If so, then yes. That was the belief of the early church.
We all think that there will be saved in the Great tribulation, but that woudl be happening after the rapture of the Church out of the world before this all happens, if holding to pre trib, and the viewpoint of many ECF would be historical premil...
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think there are more than sufficient verses in the Bible to show that the promises to the children according to the flesh (Romans 9:6-8) were conditional. Here are just a few: Exodus 19:5 (compare 1 Peter 2:9); Deuteronomy 4:26; 28:15ff; 2 Chronicles 7:19-22; Jeremiah 9:25-26; 12:14-17. It is the spiritual promises in Christ which are irrevocable (eg. Psalm 110:4).

Gen. 15:5 KJV
And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.

Gen. 13:16 KJV
And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. {/QUOTE]
Amen! And so He has done. But, 'Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham' (Galatians 3:7). That great crowd in Revelation 7:9 is of every nation, tribe, etc., but they are all children of Abraham because they are of faith.​


Col. 1:16. 'For by [Christ] all things were created that are on heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.' I think your interpretation is a bit of a stretch! The 'thrones' etc. are the earthly nations which have been given to Christ (Psalm 2:8-12).

Even more of a stretch! All things are gathered together in one. That's Jews and Gentiles- one people of God. 'One flock and one Shepherd' (John 10:16).
Matthew 5:5. 'Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.' Come on Jope! You'll have to do better than this!! The earth that is being spoken of is the new heavens and new earth, to which we all-- Jew and Gentile-- are making our way (2 Peter 3:13). Revelation 5:9-10. 'For You were slain, and have redeemed us to God by Your blood out of every tribe and tongue and nation, and have made us kings and priests to our God; and we shall reign upon the earth.' That is not this earth in which we all, like Abraham (Acts 7:5), are pilgrims and strangers, but the new Jerusalem, the 'city that has foundations' to which Abraham was travelling (Hebrews 11:10, 13-16).
Think that the Lord still could have the Promised land to saved israel that would be around at time of His second coming...

The nation of israel right now has NO Covenant intact with God, other than individual Jews being saved by Yeshua as gentiles now are under the NC, but do still see them coming back to God when Messiah returns...
 

Jope

Active Member
Site Supporter
I think there are more than sufficient verses in the Bible to show that the promises to the children according to the flesh (Romans 9:6-8) were conditional. Here are just a few: Exodus 19:5 (compare 1 Peter 2:9); Deuteronomy 4:26; 28:15ff; 2 Chronicles 7:19-22; Jeremiah 9:25-26; 12:14-17. It is the spiritual promises in Christ which are irrevocable (eg. Psalm 110:4).

Gen. 15:5 KJV
And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.

Gen. 13:16 KJV
And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. {/QUOTE]
Amen! And so He has done. But, 'Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham' (Galatians 3:7). That great crowd in Revelation 7:9 is of every nation, tribe, etc., but they are all children of Abraham because they are of faith.​


Col. 1:16. 'For by [Christ] all things were created that are on heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.' I think your interpretation is a bit of a stretch! The 'thrones' etc. are the earthly nations which have been given to Christ (Psalm 2:8-12).

Even more of a stretch! All things are gathered together in one. That's Jews and Gentiles- one people of God. 'One flock and one Shepherd' (John 10:16).
Matthew 5:5. 'Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.' Come on Jope! You'll have to do better than this!! The earth that is being spoken of is the new heavens and new earth, to which we all-- Jew and Gentile-- are making our way (2 Peter 3:13). Revelation 5:9-10. 'For You were slain, and have redeemed us to God by Your blood out of every tribe and tongue and nation, and have made us kings and priests to our God; and we shall reign upon the earth.' That is not this earth in which we all, like Abraham (Acts 7:5), are pilgrims and strangers, but the new Jerusalem, the 'city that has foundations' to which Abraham was travelling (Hebrews 11:10, 13-16).

You just said that the abrahamic covenant was unconditional. Now you're saying that the promises made to the Jews are conditional. Which one is it there flapjack?

I'll look up your references later, but I'll point out that the mosaic sinaitic covenant was conditional, the palestinian, abrahamic and davidic are unconditional though.

And I'm not going to copy paste the Colossians and Ephesians passages I referenced. You're capable of reading. The verses clearly say "heaven." That's where we'll have to leave it I guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You just said that the abrahamic covenant was unconditional. Now you're saying that the promises made to the Jews are conditional. Which one is it there flapjack?

I'll look up your references later, but I'll point out that the mosaic sinaitic covenant was conditional, the palestinian, abrahamic and davidic are unconditional though.

And I'm not going to copy paste the Colossians and Ephesians passages I referenced. You're capable of reading. The verses clearly say "heaven." That's where we'll have to leave it I guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All Jews and gentiles saved now under the NC are part also of the AC one!
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
We all think that there will be saved in the Great tribulation, but that woudl be happening after the rapture of the Church out of the world before this all happens, if holding to pre trib, and the viewpoint of many ECF would be historical premil...
Yes, that is what I said. I always wondered how, in the pre-trib scheme of things, the church is said to avoid God's wrath by rapture and yet there are some saved during this period. It seems that those saved would also be a part of the church, certainly saved, yet on earth during the tribulation (the argument doesn't make sense to me unless those who are saved during this period are also raptured upon salvation). And I agree, the three that Jope quoted held to historic premil (pre-mil, post-trib) as evidenced by what he quoted (if you include the statements before and after his quotes).
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, that is what I said. I always wondered how, in the pre-trib scheme of things, the church is said to avoid God's wrath by rapture and yet there are some saved during this period. It seems that those saved would also be a part of the church, certainly saved, yet on earth during the tribulation (the argument doesn't make sense to me unless those who are saved during this period are also raptured upon salvation). And I agree, the three that Jope quoted held to historic premil (pre-mil, post-trib) as evidenced by what he quoted (if you include the statements before and after his quotes).
The rature removes the Church, and basically those saved after fall would be I assume as now under the sense of saved butstill in old bodies, not glorified? they would populate the earth under the Millinium?
 

Jope

Active Member
Site Supporter
I think there are more than sufficient verses in the Bible to show that the promises to the children according to the flesh (Romans 9:6-8) were conditional. Here are just a few: Exodus 19:5 (compare 1 Peter 2:9); Deuteronomy 4:26; 28:15ff; 2 Chronicles 7:19-22; Jeremiah 9:25-26; 12:14-17. It is the spiritual promises in Christ which are irrevocable (eg. Psalm 110:4).

Dispensationalism teaches that the Mosaic Sinaitic covenant was conditional. Dispensationalism also teaches that the abrahamic covenant with the Jews is unconditional, alongside the palestinian and davidic (and the new covenant, Jer 31). The verses you quote are all used by dispensationalists to prove that the mosaic sinaitic covenant is conditional.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You just said that the abrahamic covenant was unconditional. Now you're saying that the promises made to the Jews are conditional. Which one is it there flapjack?
Oh boy! We are talking past each other. I'm away from home for a few days. When I get back I'll post something on a new thread.

I'll look up your references later, but I'll point out that the mosaic sinaitic covenant was conditional, the palestinian, abrahamic and davidic are unconditional though.

And I'm not going to copy paste the Colossians and Ephesians passages I referenced. You're capable of reading. The verses clearly say "heaven." That's where we'll have to leave it I guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I just proved that they also believed in pretribulationalism. Historic Premillennialism is poor scholarship.
Yet I just proved they were not pre-trib by posting the same statements but in context of their broader comments.
 

Jope

Active Member
Site Supporter
Yet I just proved they were not pre-trib by posting the same statements but in context of their broader comments.

? Make up history all you like. The church fathers works remain. unbiased reading is scholarship done right. Am I going to be a little kid and argue back and forth and copy paste the text again and again? No. if your bias fordbids you from seeing what they actually state, then your problem is beyond my repair.

Do I really care that you have stubborn bias either? Nope. I will continue to be unbiased about the issue.

Toooodles

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
? Make up history all you like. The church fathers works remain. unbiased reading is scholarship done right. Am I going to be a little kid and argue back and forth and copy paste the text again and again? No. if your bias fordbids you from seeing what they actually state, then your problem is beyond my repair.

Do I really care that you have stubborn bias either? Nope. I will continue to be unbiased about the issue.

Toooodles

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You see, that's the thing, Jope. I don't know why you are taking a partial quote here and a partial quote there to claim these guys were pre-trib. History proves that they were not, but that does not really matter. Their belief does not dictate ours. And just because a belief comes from antiquity does not affirm it is correct. Read the church fathers and you will quickly see this to be true (consider Origen and his explanation of the atonement, for example).

But people need to stop tinkering with history to make it fit their views. I disagree with the early church fathers on some things, and I agree with them on others. Take them for what they really are instead of the historical fiction you would make them out to be. Much of their writings exist today. Read them instead of little bits that you think may support your theology (your quote from Cyprian, for example, was in a chapter dealing with not holding on to this world through the persecutions even to death in this period of tribulation, but leaving it for a far better home).

As you continue to remain ignorant of the entire quotes, I will again post your partial quotes within their own context (with references from whence they came). Consider this a test of your scholarship.

Here is the fuller context (what you corrupted either intentionally or out of ignorance):

Justin Martyr

O unreasoning men! Understanding not what has been proved by all these passages, that two advents of Christ have been announced: the one, in which He is set forth as suffering, inglorious, dishonored, and crucified; but the other, in which He shall come from heaven with glory, when the man of apostasy, who speaks strange things against the Most High, shall venture to do unlawful deeds on the earth against us the Christians, who, having learned the true worship of God from the law, and the word which went forth from Jerusalem by means of the apostles of Jesus, have fled for safety to the God of Jacob and God of Israel.” – (Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho)

Irenaeus

“But he indicates the number of the name now, that when this man comes we may avoid him, being aware who he is. The name, however, is suppressed, because it is not worthy of being proclaimed.” (Irenaeus, The Writings of Irenaeus Book III)

“And therefore, when in the end the church shall suddenly be caught up from this, it is said, ‘There shall be tribulation as has not been since the beginning, neither shall be,’ For this is the last context of the righteous, in which, when they overcome, they are crowned with incorruption.” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies…..and you are reading into the text “caught up” and ignoring the remainder of Irenaeus’ words….which is poor scholarship on your part).

Cyprian

“And this, as it ought always to be done by God’s servants, much more out to be done now – now that the world is collapsing and is oppressed with the tempest of mischievous ills; in order that we who see that terrible things have begun, and know that still more terrible things are imminent, may regard it as the greatest advantage to depart from it as quickly as possible. If in your dwelling the walls were shaking with age, the roofs above you were trembling, and the house, now worn out and wearied, were threatening an immediate destruction to its structure crumbling with age, would you not with all speed depart? If, when you were on a voyage, an angry and raging tempest, by the waves violently aroused, foretold the coming shipwreck, would you not quickly seek the harbor? Lo, the world is changing and passing away, and witnesses to its ruin not now by its age, but by the end of things. And do you not give God thanks, do you not congratulate yourself, that by an earlier departure you are taken away, and delivered from the shipwrecks and disasters that are imminent? We should consider, dearly beloved brethren – we should ever and anon reflect that we have renounced the world, and are in the meantime living here as guests and strangers. Let us greet the day which assigns each of us to his own home, which snatches us hence, and sets us free from the snares of the world, and restores us to paradise and the kingdom. ( Cyprian, Treatise VII: On the Mortality)

“If, therefore, we also live as dedicated and devoted to God – if we make our way over the ancient and sacred footsteps of the righteous, let us go through the same proofs of sufferings, the same testimonies of passion, considering the glory of our time the greater on this account, that while ancient examples may be numbered, yet that subsequently, when the abundance of virtue and faith was in excess, the Christian martyrs cannot be numbered, as the Apocalypse testifies and says: “After these things I beheld a great multitude, which no man could number, of every nation…And he said unto me, These are they who have come out of the great tribulation and have washed their robes…” but if the assembly of the Christian martyrs is shown and proved to be so great, let no one think it a hard or difficult thing to become a martyr, when he sees that the crowd of martyrs cannot be numbered…In persecutions, earth is shut up, but heaven is opened; Anti-Christ is threatening, but Christ is protecting; death is brought in, but immortality follows; the world is taken away from him that is slain, but paradise is set forth to him restored; the life of time is extinguished, but the life of eternity is realized. What a dignity it is, and what a security, to go gladly from hence, to depart gloriously in the midst of afflictions and tribulations; in a moment to close the eyes with which men and the world are looked upon, and at once to open them to look upon God and Christ! Of such a blessed departure how great is the swiftness! You shall be suddenly taken away from earth, to be placed in the heavenly kingdoms.” (Cyprian, The Treatises of Cyprian)
 

Jope

Active Member
Site Supporter
You see, that's the thing, Jope. I don't know why you are taking a partial quote here and a partial quote there to claim these guys were pre-trib. History proves that they were not, but that does not really matter. Their belief does not dictate ours. And just because a belief comes from antiquity does not affirm it is correct. Read the church fathers and you will quickly see this to be true (consider Origen and his explanation of the atonement, for example).

But people need to stop tinkering with history to make it fit their views. I disagree with the early church fathers on some things, and I agree with them on others. Take them for what they really are instead of the historical fiction you would make them out to be. Much of their writings exist today. Read them instead of little bits that you think may support your theology (your quote from Cyprian, for example, was in a chapter dealing with not holding on to this world through the persecutions even to death in this period of tribulation, but leaving it for a far better home).

As you continue to remain ignorant of the entire quotes, I will again post your partial quotes within their own context (with references from whence they came). Consider this a test of your scholarship.

Here is the fuller context (what you corrupted either intentionally or out of ignorance):

Justin Martyr

O unreasoning men! Understanding not what has been proved by all these passages, that two advents of Christ have been announced: the one, in which He is set forth as suffering, inglorious, dishonored, and crucified; but the other, in which He shall come from heaven with glory, when the man of apostasy, who speaks strange things against the Most High, shall venture to do unlawful deeds on the earth against us the Christians, who, having learned the true worship of God from the law, and the word which went forth from Jerusalem by means of the apostles of Jesus, have fled for safety to the God of Jacob and God of Israel.” – (Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho)

Irenaeus

“But he indicates the number of the name now, that when this man comes we may avoid him, being aware who he is. The name, however, is suppressed, because it is not worthy of being proclaimed.” (Irenaeus, The Writings of Irenaeus Book III)

“And therefore, when in the end the church shall suddenly be caught up from this, it is said, ‘There shall be tribulation as has not been since the beginning, neither shall be,’ For this is the last context of the righteous, in which, when they overcome, they are crowned with incorruption.” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies…..and you are reading into the text “caught up” and ignoring the remainder of Irenaeus’ words….which is poor scholarship on your part).

Cyprian

“And this, as it ought always to be done by God’s servants, much more out to be done now – now that the world is collapsing and is oppressed with the tempest of mischievous ills; in order that we who see that terrible things have begun, and know that still more terrible things are imminent, may regard it as the greatest advantage to depart from it as quickly as possible. If in your dwelling the walls were shaking with age, the roofs above you were trembling, and the house, now worn out and wearied, were threatening an immediate destruction to its structure crumbling with age, would you not with all speed depart? If, when you were on a voyage, an angry and raging tempest, by the waves violently aroused, foretold the coming shipwreck, would you not quickly seek the harbor? Lo, the world is changing and passing away, and witnesses to its ruin not now by its age, but by the end of things. And do you not give God thanks, do you not congratulate yourself, that by an earlier departure you are taken away, and delivered from the shipwrecks and disasters that are imminent? We should consider, dearly beloved brethren – we should ever and anon reflect that we have renounced the world, and are in the meantime living here as guests and strangers. Let us greet the day which assigns each of us to his own home, which snatches us hence, and sets us free from the snares of the world, and restores us to paradise and the kingdom. ( Cyprian, Treatise VII: On the Mortality)

“If, therefore, we also live as dedicated and devoted to God – if we make our way over the ancient and sacred footsteps of the righteous, let us go through the same proofs of sufferings, the same testimonies of passion, considering the glory of our time the greater on this account, that while ancient examples may be numbered, yet that subsequently, when the abundance of virtue and faith was in excess, the Christian martyrs cannot be numbered, as the Apocalypse testifies and says: “After these things I beheld a great multitude, which no man could number, of every nation…And he said unto me, These are they who have come out of the great tribulation and have washed their robes…” but if the assembly of the Christian martyrs is shown and proved to be so great, let no one think it a hard or difficult thing to become a martyr, when he sees that the crowd of martyrs cannot be numbered…In persecutions, earth is shut up, but heaven is opened; Anti-Christ is threatening, but Christ is protecting; death is brought in, but immortality follows; the world is taken away from him that is slain, but paradise is set forth to him restored; the life of time is extinguished, but the life of eternity is realized. What a dignity it is, and what a security, to go gladly from hence, to depart gloriously in the midst of afflictions and tribulations; in a moment to close the eyes with which men and the world are looked upon, and at once to open them to look upon God and Christ! Of such a blessed departure how great is the swiftness! You shall be suddenly taken away from earth, to be placed in the heavenly kingdoms.” (Cyprian, The Treatises of Cyprian)

Do you actually think I didn't know where I grabbed the quotes from? Nice tactic. Nice assumption. And the fact that Cyprian is talking about not holding onto the world and etc doesn't negate that he is talking about pretribularionalism. I don't know why you think that?

And I already knew that antiquity shouldn't necessarily settle theological beliefs. My statement of the church fathers is more of a rebuttal against historic premillennialism, who seem to hold antiquity in higher regard than they ought.

I too disagree with the church fathers on things. I do think that antiquity has some plausibility and weight to it though, they spoke with the apostles and claimed to have passed down their doctrine, and isn't it significant that they were pretribularional and premillennial! Of course you don't think they were pretribularional but it's a good thing you don't dictate my beliefs or my ability to read without bias [emoji41]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
? Make up history all you like. The church fathers works remain. unbiased reading is scholarship done right. Am I going to be a little kid and argue back and forth and copy paste the text again and again? No. if your bias fordbids you from seeing what they actually state, then your problem is beyond my repair.

Do I really care that you have stubborn bias either? Nope. I will continue to be unbiased about the issue.

Toooodles

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I almost edited my last post with this one, but decided to leave it up for those who may be interested in the origin of the quotes that you provided.

If it helps your faith to believe that the early church taught pre-tribulation, then I wish you the best. I would not want to take that from you. But I think that you would find the truth a lot more interesting, a lot more exciting, and certainly much more edifying.

Biblical illiteracy is a problem and our churches today. I do not believe that the solution is to accept doctrine under false pretense. We know that those you mentioned believed the tribulation a present reality. We know what they believed about the atonement (and how they differed). We don't need to introduce fiction to support our view. If it won't stand on Scripture then it won't stand person. No amount of fictionalized history will change that.
 

Jope

Active Member
Site Supporter
I almost edited my last post with this one, but decided to leave it up for those who may be interested in the origin of the quotes that you provided.

If it helps your faith to believe that the early church taught pre-tribulation, then I wish you the best. I would not want to take that from you. But I think that you would find the truth a lot more interesting, a lot more exciting, and certainly much more edifying.

Biblical illiteracy is a problem and our churches today. I do not believe that the solution is to accept doctrine under false pretense. We know that those you mentioned believed the tribulation a present reality. We know what they believed about the atonement (and how they differed). We don't need to introduce fiction to support our view. If it won't stand on Scripture then it won't stand person. No amount of fictionalized history will change that.

Do I need to remind you of my position which I stated at the very outset of this off-course rabbit trail?

The church fathers were both pretribularional and believed that the church existed on earth during the tribulation. It makes no difference whatsoever if you show people that the church fathers believed that the church existed on earth during the tribulation! Thanks for supporting my position!

I do see that you are being a little kid and deciding to instigate a back-and-forth unfruitful argument that doesn't even disprove my position.

Koodos to that then! I'm likewise posting this so that hearers will indulge in childish converstaion. Have a good one, again, Jon !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Do I need to remind you of my position which I stated at the very outset of this off-course rabbit trail?

The church fathers were both pretribularional and believed that the church existed on earth during the tribulation. It makes no difference whatsoever if you show people that the church fathers believed that the church existed on earth during the tribulation! Thanks for supporting my position!

I do see that you are being a little kid and deciding to instigate a back-and-forth unfruitful argument that doesn't even disprove my position.

Koodos to that then! I'm likewise posting this so that hearers will indulge in childish converstaion. Have a good one, again, Jon !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You are not making sense. You seem to indicate that you understand those you quoted believed that the tribulation was a present reality but then argue they were pre-trib. The two do not reconcile.

And it is you that put us on this trail, and you that have kept us here by returning to the error.

So I am assuming that you are not a child, and asking that you act in a more mature manner. I have been replying to your posts, to your comment about a doctrine being held by the early church fathers. If you want to plug your ears to reality, ignore the writings and evidences against that off topic notion, then be my guest. But do not pretend that I am somehow arguing something that you have not introduced into the thread. What is of more concern is your carelessness with history. We have their writings, if you have not noticed.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I almost edited my last post with this one, but decided to leave it up for those who may be interested in the origin of the quotes that you provided.

If it helps your faith to believe that the early church taught pre-tribulation, then I wish you the best. I would not want to take that from you. But I think that you would find the truth a lot more interesting, a lot more exciting, and certainly much more edifying.

Biblical illiteracy is a problem and our churches today. I do not believe that the solution is to accept doctrine under false pretense. We know that those you mentioned believed the tribulation a present reality. We know what they believed about the atonement (and how they differed). We don't need to introduce fiction to support our view. If it won't stand on Scripture then it won't stand person. No amount of fictionalized history will change that.
The ECF seemed to favor historical premil, so Jope should not use them as a reference to supporting pre trib, but he can use the bible itself for that!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You are not making sense. You seem to indicate that you understand those you quoted believed that the tribulation was a present reality but then argue they were pre-trib. The two do not reconcile.

And it is you that put us on this trail, and you that have kept us here by returning to the error.

So I am assuming that you are not a child, and asking that you act in a more mature manner. I have been replying to your posts, to your comment about a doctrine being held by the early church fathers. If you want to plug your ears to reality, ignore the writings and evidences against that off topic notion, then be my guest. But do not pretend that I am somehow arguing something that you have not introduced into the thread. What is of more concern is your carelessness with history. We have their writings, if you have not noticed.
he can just stay in the scriptures to support that viewpoint, as there was no rapture as pre trib until time of Darby!
Not saying that is a false doctrine, but just that cannot be supported by quoting the ECF!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top