-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If you say thithing is a command ....
- Thread starter Salty
- Start date
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
You don't tithe???!!!!
For the record... I neither tithe nor sacrifice lamb.
I do however give to my church and EAT lamb.
Egad!!
The single man CPF (Commandment Police Force) will be in here shortly to berate you.
I shake...
And while I approve of the term CPE... I think Judaizer is more appropriate.
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
That should work.
You sure like 3 letter acronyms... Do you work for the .gov??
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
I work for a Higher Power.That should work.
You sure like 3 letter acronyms... Do you work for the .gov??
GOD
LOL
:thumbs: Nice. I walked into that one. LOL
So... about that tithe...
I still don't do it. :smilewinkgrin:
HisWitness
New Member
Yahshua's blood has been shed--animal sacrifice is not needed anymore
that doesn't mean NOT to observe the 10 commandments Yahshua said that through 2 commandments that ALL the LAW and prophets hung--thereby in us keeping the 2 he listed that ALL of the LAW would be observed by us through those 2.:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:
such as 10 commandments--and even dietary laws also--if you have a proper understanding of what they meant and why they are to be observed in the first place ---you would understand!!!
Last edited by a moderator:
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
Nor do I.
Malachi 3:7 Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and have not kept them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. But ye said, Wherein shall we return?
Ephesians 2:14 & 15 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
Malachi 3:7 Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and have not kept them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. But ye said, Wherein shall we return?
Ephesians 2:14 & 15 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
You cannot separate the Law. The tripartite division of the Mosaic Law is unbiblical, the Law is a unit. Do you know the purpose of that Law?
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
Exactly, RL!
The Law cannot be separated. Paul wrote that if one is going to submit to any part of the Mosaic Law, he must continue in all of the Mosaic Law.
Of course, we know that the (JPP) Judaizing Panel of Pharisees, which consists of a board of one on the BB, is not continuing in all of the Mosaic Law.
He has proven that he cannot even keep the parts of the Law he insists we obey.
The Law cannot be separated. Paul wrote that if one is going to submit to any part of the Mosaic Law, he must continue in all of the Mosaic Law.
Of course, we know that the (JPP) Judaizing Panel of Pharisees, which consists of a board of one on the BB, is not continuing in all of the Mosaic Law.
He has proven that he cannot even keep the parts of the Law he insists we obey.
BWAHAHAHAHA!
:laugh::laugh::thumbs:
"Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? - Acts 15:10 NASB
HisWitness
New Member
Then quote me a verse that says the son of Yah in the NT.
that above quote is from DHK--who closed thread before I could answer.
heres the answer my friend.
Psalm 68-4 gives the NAME of the father which is YAH.
SO I say the Son of YAH(I don't use Pagan titles as you do such as god)
the translators of our bibles has taken that NAME in Psalm 68-4 out and replaced it with Pagan titles such as god over 6k times in our bibles.
there is a ton of info on it on the internet for you to study and see about it.
so it is Scriptural to say the Son of YAH.
that above quote is from DHK--who closed thread before I could answer.
heres the answer my friend.
Psalm 68-4 gives the NAME of the father which is YAH.
SO I say the Son of YAH(I don't use Pagan titles as you do such as god)
the translators of our bibles has taken that NAME in Psalm 68-4 out and replaced it with Pagan titles such as god over 6k times in our bibles.
there is a ton of info on it on the internet for you to study and see about it.
so it is Scriptural to say the Son of YAH.
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
I'll believe our Bibles rather than the internet. Posts on the internet are not inspired by God... our Bibles are.
HisWitness
New Member
just another vain attempt in rejection of truth to maintain -denomination man-made doctrines.:thumbs::thumbs:
HisWitness
New Member
NO friend the original texts were INSPIRED BY YAH
we DONT have the original texts but through 4 languages--we have translations by some NON-INSPIRED MEN who have made some translation errors in what we have today. :thumbs::thumbs:
Possibly... OR a hilarious meme showing you the idiocy of gaining your theology from the internet.... I'll take option 2.
You still haven't answered my question from post 12 either