Tom...you should be super sensitive. But like anything else, I would sincerely hope that the person introducing anything controversial into the church would explain it & justify it through Scripture vs ramming it down someones throat. Like anything else Tom, we as Christians are all growing through the instruction of the HS & through his Scripture. Now were you always a Calvinist & just how does a blended theology church affect your present situation? Right.
Have a good w/e.
Thanks, and you as well.
I understand that we ought always to be open to instruction through the Word and enlightening by the Holy Spirit. There are a few issues, particularly in eschatology where my official position is "this is where I am right now. I might not be there tomorrow."
I suppose the gifts of the Spirit fall into that category. Right now, I believe that God may allow a missionary to speak in a language he's never learned (as on the day of Pentecost). I believe God can supernaturally heal someone without the aid of doctors or medicines. I have seen it happen, unilaterally without using any human.
I also believe that if one has the gift of healing, he has it all the time, and that divine healing is not dependent on the faith of the one who is healed, nor upon the faith of the one who supposedly has the gift.
That said, I do not believe all the gifts are operational as they were in apostolic times.
Now, on some other issues, my mind is made up and I don't plan to change. I will always believe salvation is through repentance and faith, baptism is for believers only by immersion, and Jesus is coming again.
But the older I get, the less set in my ways I am about stuff I was pretty rigid about in you younger days.